United States: Non-Competitors May Now Bring False Advertising Claims Under The Lanham Act

Last Updated: April 11 2014

Article by Laura Goldbard George, Matthew Siegal and Madelon Witte, a law school graduate awaiting admission.

Supreme Court Rules in Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.

On March 25, 2014, the Supreme Court made it easier for a non-competitor to state a claim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. The Court resolved a long-standing split among the Circuits by explaining that a company may sue a non-competitor for false advertising under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, as long as it alleges "an injury to a commercial interest in reputation or sales" that was proximately caused by the allegedly false or misleading advertisements.1 Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., No. 12-873, 572 U.S. ___ (2014) (slip op.) ("Lexmark"). In doing so, the Court overruled numerous potentially more complex tests that had been applied by the Circuit Courts for determining the circumstances under which non-competitors could assert such an action. Specifically, the Court found that Static Control could sue Lexmark under the Lanham Act for statements Lexmark made to Static Control's customers regarding Static Control's alleged violation of Lexmark's intellectual property, even though Lexmark was not Static Control's direct competitor, on the grounds that Lexmark's public statements were the proximate cause of the requisite injury to Static Control.2

The Circuits had been divided on the circumstances under which an entity, believing itself to be falsely accused of intellectual property violations or indirectly harmed by other types of false advertising, could sue its accuser under the false advertising provisions of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B). Faced with a conflicting mélange of standards by which to determine when a plaintiff could bring such a suit, the Supreme Court rejected them all. Instead, the Court determined that in order to bring a suit under § 43(a), a company must show that its interests fall within "the zone of interests" covered by the Lanham Act, such as interests in sales or business reputation, and that the injury suffered was "proximately caused" by the defendant's activity and therefore, not too remotely related.3


Lexmark sells printers and toner cartridges for use in its printers. The empty cartridges fuel a robust aftermarket. Third party remanufacturers acquire, refill, refurbish and offer the refurbished cartridges for sale in competition with cartridges sold by Lexmark itself. In order to combat these aftermarket sales, Lexmark initiated a "Prebate" program in an effort to contractually restrict the rights cartridge purchasers have to directly or indirectly refill used cartridges. New cartridges bear a "shrinkwrap" license stipulating that once empty, the cartridges will be returned to Lexmark.4

Lexmark embeds each Prebate cartridge with a microchip, which is programmed to deactivate the cartridge once empty. Upon return of the cartridge, Lexmark replaces the microchip, refills and refurbishes the cartridge, then resells the refurbished cartridge. Static Control sells toner and other supplies to cartridge remanufacturers but does not sell cartridges to consumers in competition with Lexmark.5 Rather, Static Control developed a substitute microchip and sells that chip to remanufacturers for inclusion in refurbished Lexmark cartridges.6

Lexmark sued Static Control, alleging that the substitute chips violated its copyright and other intellectual property in the chips. Lexmark also sent letters to Static Control's customers, alleging that it was illegal to use Static Control's microchip to override Lexmark's deactivation technology. Static Control denied infringement and also counterclaimed under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act for false advertising. Static Control alleged that Lexmark's letters, pronouncing Static Control's merchandise illegal, had fraudulently diverted sales from Static Control to Lexmark, even though Lexmark and Static Control were not direct competitors.7

Circuit Split

The district court dismissed Static Control's counterclaim, holding that under a balancing test articulated by an earlier Supreme Court case, Associated Gen. Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519 (1983), Static Control was not the proper party to bring the false advertising claim. The district court held that because the remanufacturers were more directly injured by Lexmark's accusations of illegality, the remanufacturers were the appropriate plaintiffs, and that Static Control's injury was too remote for it to state a claim. The court found that Lexmark's "alleged intent [was] to dry up spent cartridge supplies at the remanufacturing level, rather than at [Static Control's chip] supply level, making remanufacturers Lexmark's alleged intended target."8

The Sixth Circuit reversed by applying a "reasonable interest" test, developed by the Second Circuit,9 to assess whether Static Control had enough of a direct interest to bring the claim. The Sixth Circuit held that Static Control was an appropriate Lanham Act plaintiff, because it "alleged a cognizable interest in its business reputation and sales to remanufacturers and sufficiently alleged that th[o]se interests were harmed by Lexmark's statements to the remanufacturers that Static Control was engaging in illegal conduct."10

Under such circumstances, different circuits have applied different tests that have led to different outcomes. The Third, Fifth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits analyzed Lanham Act false advertising claims under an "antitrust standing" test, which employed the same multifactor balancing test engaged in by the district court when it held that Static Control had not stated a cause of action under the Lanham Act. On the other hand, the Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits analyzed these claims under a bright-line categorical test, allowing suits to move forward only when brought by an actual competitor. The Second Circuit and, in this instance, the Sixth Circuit, applied a "reasonable interest" test.11

The Decision

The Supreme Court declined to adopt any of these tests and instead articulated a new two-prong test. First, the plaintiff's interest must exist within the "zone of interests" intended to be protected by the Lanham Act. Second, the injury for which the plaintiff seeks redress must be "proximately tied" to the defendant's alleged violation.12

The Court explained that the "zone of interests" or "sphere of intended protection" is explicitly spelled out by Section 45 of the Act:

The intent of this chapter is to regulate commerce within the control of Congress by making actionable the deceptive and misleading use of marks in such commerce; to protect registered marks used in such commerce from interference by State, or territorial legislation; to protect persons engaged in such commerce against unfair competition; to prevent fraud and deception in such commerce by the use of reproductions, copies, counterfeits, or colorable imitations of registered marks; and to provide rights and remedies stipulated by treaties and conventions respecting trademarks, trade names, and unfair competition entered into between the United States and foreign nations.13

Interpreting this statement of intent, the Supreme Court held that "to come within the zone of interests in a suit for false advertising under § 1125(a), a plaintiff must allege an injury to a commercial interest in reputation or sales." It is crucial that the injury alleged be related to a commercial interest – "a business misled by a supplier into purchasing an inferior product is, like consumers generally, not under the Act's aegis."14

The second prong of the standard requires that the plaintiff's injury be proximately caused by violation of the Lanham Act's proscription on false or misleading advertising. Although proximate cause can be a nebulous concept, according to the Court, the crux of the inquiry is "whether the harm alleged has a sufficiently close connection to the conduct the statute prohibits."15 In other words, the harm may not be so remote from the Lanham Act violation that the plaintiff cannot show "economic or reputational injury flowing directly from the deception wrought by the defendant's advertising."16 Such an injury occurs "when deception of consumers causes them to withhold trade from the plaintiff."17 As an example, the Court explained that "while a competitor who is forced out of business by a defendant's false advertising generally will be able to sue for its losses, the same is not true of the competitor's landlord, its electric company, and other commercial parties who suffer merely as a result of the competitor's 'inability to meet [its] financial obligations.'"18


Prior to this decision, an indirect competitor such as Static Control would have had more difficulty stating a claim under Section 43(a) in circuits adhering to the bright-line "actual competitor" test and those adhering to the balancing test followed by the district court. Now, an indirect competitor harmed by false or misleading advertising need only allege an injury to its commercial interest in reputation or sales, proximately caused by the defendant's alleged Lanham Act violation. This change opens the door to § 43(a) suits previously foreclosed by circuits adhering to the aforementioned bright-line and balancing standards.

Based on Lexmark, potential liability stemming from allegedly misleading, disparaging, or false advertising which harms business reputation is greater today than it was prior to this decision. Although "diversion of sales to a direct competitor may be the paradigmatic direct injury from false advertising, it is not the only type of injury cognizable under §1125(a)."19 Static Control's allegations that Lexmark harmed its reputation by impugning the legality of its products was found to be an injury intended for protection by the Lanham Act, and was found to be proximately caused by the Act's alleged breach. Even though Static Control and Lexmark are not direct competitors, "competition is not required for proximate cause."20

For More Information

Laura Goldbard George

Matthew Siegal


1. Slip Op. at 13.

2. Slip Op. at 10.

3. Id.

4. Slip Op. at 2.

5. Id.

6. Id.

7. Slip Op. at 4.

8. App. to Pet. for Cert. 83.

9. The reasonable interest test: whether an entity could show that it had a "reasonable interest to be protected against the alleged false advertising," and a "reasonable basis for believing that the interest is likely to be damaged by the false advertising." Slip Op. at 5

10. 697 F.3d at 411

11. Slip Op. at 5.

12. Slip Op. at 13.

13. 15 U.S.C. § 1127

14. Slip Op. at 13.

15. Slip Op. at 14.

16. Slip Op. at 15.

17. Id.

18. Id. (citing Anza, 547 U.S. at 458).

19. Slip Op. at 19.

20. Slip Op. at 20.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.