United States: Supreme Court ERISA "Stock-Drop" Argument Features Debate Over Fiduciary Duties

Last Updated: April 10 2014
Article by James P. McElligott, Jr and Jeffrey Capwell

Earlier this week, in a crowded Supreme Court courtroom, lawyers and justices debated the ERISA fiduciary duties of employers who sponsor employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) and who are alleged to have "inside information" that should reasonably lead them to conclude that the stock will decline in value (a so-called "stock drop"). The justices heard argument from the plaintiffs, defendants and the U.S. Solicitor General in the case of Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer.

The Court accepted the Dudenhoeffer case to consider the following question:

Whether the Sixth Circuit erred by holding that [participants] were not required to plausibly allege in their complaint that the fiduciaries of an employee stock ownership plan abused their discretion by remaining invested in employer stock, in order to overcome the presumption that their decision to invest in employer stock was reasonable, as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 * * * and every other circuit to address the issue.

Because many employers offer the option of investing in similar company stock funds, amicus briefs in support of Fifth Third Bancorp (Fifth Third) and urging reversal were filed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the American Benefits Council, the ERISA Industry Committee, the National Association of Manufacturers and others. The Solicitor General and supporters of the plaintiffs' ERISA bar — including AARP and the AFL-CIO — filed amicus briefs arguing that the Sixth Circuit's decision should be affirmed.

Seven other circuit courts of appeal have held that the congressional policy of encouraging employee stock ownership requires that ERISA fiduciaries be given the presumption of prudence when offering participants an option to invest in company stock. These courts generally require allegations by the plaintiff that the company faced dire financial circumstances, not merely a drop in the company's stock price, in order for the presumption to be rebutted and for plan fiduciaries to be subject to claims for breach of their ERISA fiduciary duties for continuing to allow the plan to hold employer stock.

In stark contrast, the Sixth Circuit held that whether a fiduciary acts prudently by offering an employer stock fund turns on whether a "prudent fiduciary acting under similar circumstances would have made a different investment decision." Dudenhoeffer v. Fifth Third Bancorp, 692 F.3d 410, 418-19 (6th Cir. 2012), cert. granted, 82 U.S.L.W. 3364 (U.S. Dec. 13, 2013) (No. 12-751). The Sixth Circuit agreed that a presumption of prudence would be appropriate in these circumstances, but only at the summary judgment and trial stage of the lawsuit, after plaintiffs had the opportunity for extensive and expensive discovery against the fiduciaries.

Thus, the procedural question presented in Dudenhoeffer is of major significance in determining the viability of a stock-drop claim. As one amicus brief stated in arguing for reversal, "expensive and time-consuming discovery inexorably follows the failure to dismiss an unmeritorious claim, which pressures plan fiduciaries to settle regardless of the suit's lack of merit." Brief for Chamber of Commerce of the United States, the ERISA Industry Committee, the American Benefits Council, the Plan Sponsor Council of America and the National Association of Manufacturers, at p. 5.

Facts Alleged in Dudenhoeffer

The complaint in Dudenhoeffer made allegations common to most ERISA stock-drop cases.

Fifth Third maintained a Section 401(k) retirement plan that provided for participant-directed investments. The plan offered several investment options for participants, including the company stock fund and 17 mutual funds. As is frequently the case with such plans, particularly those sponsored by employers whose stock is publicly traded, the company stock fund was structured to qualify as an ESOP for purposes of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. The company matched 100 percent of the first 4 percent of an employee's compensation with company contributions to the Fifth Third stock fund, but permitted participants to reinvest the matching contribution in other investment options.

Like many financial institutions, Fifth Third experienced a substantial decline in its stock price from July 2007 to September 2009, causing the stock fund to lose tens of millions of dollars. Plaintiffs argued in their lawsuit that the fiduciaries violated ERISA fiduciary duties by holding and purchasing shares of Fifth Third long after it ceased to be prudent to do so.

The district court dismissed the lawsuit, finding that the company was entitled to a presumption that its continued investment in company stock was reasonable. The Sixth Circuit reversed, reasoning that plaintiffs had sufficiently alleged that the fiduciaries had violated their fiduciary duty and caused the losses to the plan. The Sixth Circuit ruled that the presumption is not to be applied at the pleading stage of the lawsuit.

Supreme Court Argument

The justices surprised most observers by focusing much of the hour-long argument on what an ERISA fiduciary must do if it has inside information that employer stock held by an ESOP is overvalued. Except for a few brief references, the justices did not discuss the question presented of whether a presumption of reasonableness applies at the pleadings stage of a stock-drop lawsuit.

During the argument, justices questioned whether Fifth Third's counsel was proposing a lower level of responsibility for ESOP fiduciaries ("coach-class" duties, as Justice Kennedy put it). Fifth Third's counsel argued that duties of an ESOP fiduciary should be understood in the context of a congressional intent to encourage retirement savings through investment in company stock and that a fiduciary's ERISA obligations to ESOP participants should not be defined in a way that thwarts that intent.

The justices questioned plaintiffs' counsel as to actions a fiduciary with inside information concerning employer stock should take. Chief Justice Roberts questioned counsel as follows:

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Well, can we talk concretely instead of just saying, well, they've got to do what a prudent fiduciary can do? Are they allowed to take into account the impact of a decision to stop buying on the beneficiaries? The stock is going down, if the trustee stops buying, that's going to cause a drop in the value of the shares and that's going to hurt the beneficiaries. So what does he do? Does he say, I shouldn't buy any more because I think it's going to go down some more? Or should he say, I should keep buying because otherwise all of the holdings, and this is all they are invested in, their holdings are going to go down?

MR. MANN: I think the obligation of the fiduciary at all times is to behave prudently in managing investment prudently. There might –

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: I asked for an answer to the question. And I — it doesn't — it's not going to help me to have this mantra as opposed to –

MR. MANN: Well, I don't — I don't believe that the question is whether they must sell or mustn't sell. I think they have to decide would it be in the — based on the facts we know right now, do we believe that this is a short-term blip in the stocks and it will rise back up, in which case, we –

Official transcript of oral argument in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, No. 12-751, April 2, 2014 (Transcript), pp 38-39.

During the Solicitor General's argument (who supported the participants), the justices pressed the question of what actions a fiduciary with inside knowledge should take. The justices raised questions as to whether a fiduciary's decision to merely stop purchasing more shares would be sufficient to protect participants' interests, as the market would likely interpret that action as raising concerns over the value of employer stock.

Counsel for both sides debated the fundamental nature of ESOPs, with counsel for Fifth Third emphasizing the goal of employee ownership over the goal of providing retirement savings, a point that did not seem to impress the justices.

Justice Ginsberg flatly questioned the appropriateness of a presumption of prudence: "[Apart from no duty to diversify the ESOP], the statutory requirement on loyalty and prudence is undiluted. And so I don't see where this presumption comes from." Transcript, pp. 6-7.

Where Will the Court Go from Here?

On balance, it is hard to predict how the Court will decide this case. Some justices appear to appreciate the limited options that an ESOP fiduciary has in these circumstances and may understand why seven courts of appeal have adopted the presumption of prudence. However, the justices do not appear interested in providing ESOP fiduciaries with a lesser standard of diligence.

A majority of the justices seemed to be looking for a better solution than the presumption of prudence, but seemed dissatisfied with the proposals offered by plaintiffs' counsel and the government. Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg seemed inclined to the view that ESOP fiduciaries with potential inside information know they may have this dilemma and must suffer the consequences.

The Court is expected to issue an opinion in June. We expect a split decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions