United States: Trying To Clear The Fog Over Blogs

Last Updated: March 25 2014
Article by Jamie L. Edmonson

Two recent ethics opinions issued by the New York State Bar Association's Committee on Professional Ethics,1 as well as a recent decision from the Virginia Supreme Court,2 are spotlighting some of the issues surrounding the ethical standards regarding the propriety of attorney blogs and the contents thereof.

NYSBA Opinion 912: "Publishing Criticism of Other Attorneys"

Opinion 912, issued on March 5, 2012, holds that the New York Rules of Professional Conduct do not prohibit a lawyer from hosting or participating in a blog dedicated to publishing factually accurate criticism of another lawyer's professional conduct. The New York Committee on Professional Ethics initially looked to New York Rule 8.2 for guidance; however, that rule only addresses lawyer criticism of members of the judiciary.3

There is no comparable provision specifically addressing public criticism of a lawyer by another lawyer.

The Committee then looked to New York Rule 8.4(c), which prohibits a lawyer from engaging in conduct "involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation," and New York Rule 8.4(d), which prohibits a lawyer from engaging in conduct that is "prejudicial to the administration of justice." In applying both rules, the Committee found that neither rule applied so long as the blog criticism is sufficiently accurate.

Opinion 912 was issued in response to an Internet blog used as a forum for lawyers to publish factually accurate criticism of an adversary's professional conduct. Although it found that the rules do not prohibit a blog dedicated to publishing factually accurate criticism of another lawyer's conduct, the Committee noted that the "Standards of Civility" adopted by the Uniform Court System provide a norm of acceptable behavior for the practice of law, although the standards are aspirational and not intended to be enforced by sanction or disciplinary action.

While the New York Rules don't seem to limit the ability of a lawyer to criticize another attorney, assuming that the criticism is factually accurate, the use of blogs for other means, such as to advertise legal services or to seek retention from potential clients, is likely subject to ethics rules, both in New York and in other jurisdictions.

NYBSA Opinion 967: "Lawyer Advertising"

Opinion 967, issued on June 5, 2013, holds that a blog written by an attorney that does not discuss legal topics and is not primarily geared toward the retention of the lawyer is not an advertisement and, therefore, is not subject to the rules regarding lawyer advertising.

Opinion 967 was issued after a blogger, who is also an attorney licensed in New York, made an inquiry to the New York State Bar with respect to a proposed blog, which was to be written for his employer. The proposed blog would not address legal topics, but would include posts promoting work/life balance. The issue was whether the blog was an advertisement subject to the retention and preservation requirements of the attorney advertising rules. New York Rule 7.1 contains extensive requirements with respect to attorney advertising, and New York Rule 7.1(k) provides, "Any advertisement contained in a computer-accessed communication4 shall be retained for a period of not less than one year. A copy of the contents of any web site covered by this Rule shall be preserved." The rule applies only to those computer-accessed communications that are deemed "advertisements."5 After determining that the blog was a public communication made by the lawyer, the Committee turned to the issue of whether the blog "is for the retention of the lawyer."

Recognizing that the attorney's blog would not discuss legal issues and that the attorney did not intend to solicit clients for a law practice, the Committee held that the blog was not an advertisement, although the name of the blog author indicated that the author was an attorney. In contrast to New York, however, other states, including Virginia, are more restrictive in what is considered an advertisement for purposes of an attorney blog.

Hunter v. Va. State Bar

Horace F. Hunter, an attorney with Hunter & Lipton in Richmond, Va., maintained a blog, "This Week in Richmond Criminal Defense." The blog was accessible through the firm's website and discussed a variety of legal issues and cases. Most of the posts described cases in which Hunter had obtained favorable results for his clients.

The Virginia State Bar investigated Hunter's blog and determined that it constituted advertising under the Rule 7.1 of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct.6 The Bar also charged Hunter with violating Virginia Rule 7.2(a)(3), on the grounds that he disseminated case results in advertising without the required disclaimer,7 and Virginia Rule 1.6, on the grounds that he disseminated client confidences without their consent.

Hunter challenged the Bar, arguing that his blog was primarily political speech, not commercial speech. Hunter argued that a the Bar could not use its advertising rules to regulate noncommercial speech, and any attempt to regulate noncommercial speech had to be tested under the Constitution's "strict scrutiny" standard. In regard to the charge that he breached Virginia Rule 1.6, Hunter asserted that his statements about his former clients were made in a public proceeding and were, therefore, not confidential, or alternatively, that the Bar's application of Virginia Rule 1.6 to the blog was an unconstitutional abridgement of his free speech rights.

The Bar ruled that Hunter's blog violated all three of the Virginia Rules and imposed a public admonition that included a requirement that Hunter remove case-specific content from the blog for which he had not received client consent, and that he post a disclaimer complying with Virginia Rule 7.2 on all case-related posts. Hunter appealed to the Virginia Court of Appeals, which overturned the Bar's ruling that the blog violated Virginia Rule 1.6, but the court did affirm the ruling that the blog violated the rules regarding advertising. The court ordered that Hunter post the following disclaimer: "Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case."

Hunter appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court, which issued its opinion on Feb. 28, 2013. The court ruled that Hunter's blog posts did not violate client confidentiality under Virginia Rule 1.6 because all of the posts involved cases that had been concluded and contained public information that would have been protected speech if the media or others had disseminated it.

The court also ruled that Hunter's blog posts were a form of commercial speech, rather than political speech, and could be regulated by the Bar, as the statements or claims made were potentially misleading without the required disclaimer. The court reversed and remanded that part of the lower court's ruling for the imposition of disclaimers that fully comply with Virginia Rule 7.2.8

Summary

Although the application of rules of professional conduct with respect to social media and blogs is still evolving, many law firms have implemented their own social media policies in an attempt to circumvent any potential disciplinary action of their attorneys. In the area of social media, the prudent course is to always assume that compliance with the ethical rules is required.

 Footnotes

1. New York State Bar Association Committee on Ethics, Opinion 912 (March 15, 2012) and Opinion 967 (June 5, 2013).

2. Hunter v. Va. State Bar, 744 S.E. 2d 611 (Va. 2013), cert. denied.

3. A lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of fact concerning the qualifications, conduct or integrity of a judge or other adjudicatory officer or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial office."

4. New York Rule 1.0(c) defines "computer-accessed communication" as "any communication made by or on behalf of a lawyer of law firm that is disseminated through the use of a computer or related electronic device, including, but not limited to, web sites, weblogs, search engines, electronic mail, banner advertisements, pop-up and pop-under advertisements, chat rooms, list servers, instant messaging, or other internet presences, and any attachments or links related thereto."

5. New York Rule 1.0(a) defines "advertisement" as "any public or private communication made by or on behalf of a lawyer or law firm about the lawyer or law firm's services, the primary purpose of which is for the retention of the lawyer or law firm."

6. Virginia Rule 7.1 provides:

1. A lawyer shall not, on behalf of the lawyer or any other lawyer affiliated with the lawyer or the firm, use or participate in the use of any form of public communication if such communication contains a false, fraudulent, misleading, or deceptive statement or claim. For example, a communication violates this Rule if it:

(4) is likely to create an unjustified expectation about results the lawyer can achieve, or states or implies that the lawyer can achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law.

7. Virginia Rule 7.2(a)(3) provides:

1. Subject to the requirements of Rules 7.1 and 7.3, a lawyer may advertise services through written, recorded, or electronic communications, including public media. In the determination of whether an advertisement violates this Rule, the advertisement shall be considered in its entirety, including any qualifying statements or disclaimers contained therein. Notwithstanding the requirements of Rule 7.1, an advertisement violates this Rule if it:

(3) advertises specific or cumulative case results, without a disclaimer that (i) puts the case results in a context that is not misleading; (ii) states that case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case; and (iii) further states that case results do no guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case undertaken by the lawyer. The disclaimer shall precede the communication or the case results. When the communication is in writing, the disclaimer shall be in bold type face and uppercase letters in a font size that is at least as large as the largest text used to advertise the specific or cumulative case results and in the same colored background as the text used to advertise the specific or cumulative case results.

8. In April 2013, the Virginia Supreme Court adopted amendments to the Virginia Rules that eliminated Rule 7.2 but retained the disclaimer requirement as Rule 7.1(b). The amendments became effective July 1, 2013.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions