United States: The Herrick Scorecard - Spring 2014

Herrick Box Score

Vote for New York City FC's Official Badge

As reported in a prior edition, Herrick's Sports Law Group represented New York City FC, Major League Soccer's 20th club, in the negotiation of a multi-year partnership with CBS Radio to broadcast the club's games. Now NYCFC is deciding on its official badge, and you can be a part of the process. Visit nycfc.com today to vote for one of the two badges in contention.

21st Century Fox Says Yes to YES

We are proud to announce the successful closing of 21st Century Fox's acquisition of a majority stake in the Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network (YES Network). Our Sports Law Group represented the New York Yankees and an affiliate of Yankee Global Enterprises in the transaction, which effectively increases Fox's ownership stake to 80 percent. The remaining 20 percent stake will be held by the Yankee Global Enterprises affiliate.

Just asking...

With the Major League Baseball season right around the corner, we wondered why a pitcher, when ahead in the count 0-2, typically "wastes" a pitch by throwing a ball outside of the strike zone.  So we posed that question to a former Yankees pitcher who is the "author" of a no-hitter.

And while you are at it... only three MLB players have played for all four former and current New York baseball franchises – the Giants, Dodgers, Yankees and Mets.  Who are they?

Answers will appear in our next edition.

Sympathy for the Devil(s)

In 2010, Herrick's Sports Law Group represented then New Jersey Devils forward Ilya Kovalchuk in dealing with National Hockey League claims regarding his record 17-year, $102 million contract.  The NHL argued that the contract wrongly circumvented the salary cap provisions of the then-existing collective bargaining agreement.  The Devils ultimately signed Kovalchuk to a 15-year, $100 million contract.

At the time, the Devils were assessed a $3 million fine and stripped of several draft picks including a 1st rounder (at the Devils option) in 2011, 2012, 2013 or 2014.  The Devils deferred the loss of the 1st round pick until 2014.  This decision proved to be founded on "solid ice" as Kovulchuk retired from the NHL in 2013 and returned to play hockey in his native Russia.

On March 6th, the NHL modified that penalty.  Although the NHL did not say so (at least not publically), the NHL (like the Rolling Stones several decades ago) apparently felt some sympathy for the Devil(s).  The NHL announced that the fine assessed against the Devils would be halved (to $1.5 million) and the Devils could retain their 2014 1st round pick (albeit at the very end of the round, and not where it would fall based on the Devils' performance in 2013-14).

NHL Press Release "Devils' Penalty for Kovalchuk Contract Modified" (Mar. 6, 2014)

Bankruptcy Court Changes "Ground Rules" on Houston Astros

Traditionally, prior to the start of a baseball game, the ball park ground rules are discussed by the managers.  Unfortunately for the Houston Astros, there was no prior discussion of the "ground rules" of the federal bankruptcy court located in Houston before the Astros took the "courthouse field."

The Astros are a partner in a regional sports network (the "RSN") formed as a Delaware limited partnership to televise Astros' baseball, Houston Rockets' basketball games and other sports programming in the Houston area.  As permitted by Delaware law, the RSN's partnership agreement provided that the partners would not owe fiduciary duties to the RSN or each other and that each partner (and its designated director) would be entitled to act in its own self-interest in making decisions for the RSN.

In September 2013, an involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition was filed against the RSN.  The Astros sought to dismiss the petition on the ground that the RSN's Chapter 11 reorganization would be futile.  In support of its position, the Astros relied upon the unfettered right of its designated director under the RSN's partnership agreement to veto any proposal concerning the Astros' media rights agreement.

The bankruptcy court denied the Astros' motion to dismiss the petition and ruled that, notwithstanding the elimination of fiduciary duties under the RSN's partnership agreement, the Astros' designated director owed fiduciary duties to the bankruptcy estate that could not be waived.  Accordingly, the Astros' designated director was not at liberty to indiscriminately veto proposals concerning the Astros' media rights agreement.  The Astros appealed the bankruptcy court's decision on the ground that neither the U.S. Bankruptcy Code nor case law supports the bankruptcy court's decision that bankruptcy law does not recognize valid waivers of fiduciary duties under state law.

We will continue to keep our eye on the ball in this case and report further developments in future editions.

In re Houston Reg. Sports Network, L.P., No. 13-35998 (Bankr. S. D. Tex, Feb. 12, 2014)

Whose Tattoo? Think Before You Ink

The proliferation of tattoos or "ink" on athletes cannot be denied.  As the athletes' tattoos are disseminated over the seemingly ever-widening spectrum of broadcast, print and social media, tattoo artists have sought to receive copyright royalties for their work.  This trend has raised the "prickly" issue of who owns the copyright to the tattoo images on the athletes' bodies.

The courts have not definitively ruled on the issue of "ink ownership" -- to date, parties to tattoo copyright lawsuits have settled their disputes, rather than fully litigate the issue.  Despite the absence of a definitive ruling on tattoo copyright ownership, the courts nonetheless have left their mark.  One court, in rejecting a tattoo artist's request for a preliminary injunction to bar the release of the movie, The Hangover: Part II, indicated that the tattoo artist would likely succeed on the merits of his copyright infringement claim.  In this movie, the tattoo at issue is a large Maori-inspired tattoo which adorns the left side of former heavyweight boxer Mike Tyson's face.  This lawsuit settled prior to going to trial.

More recently, a tattoo artist sued a video game maker and former Miami Dolphins running back, Ricky Williams, over a tattoo on one of Williams' biceps.  The tattoo was visible on the image of Williams appearing on the cover of the video maker's game packaging.  Despite the settlement of this lawsuit, the National Football League Players Association has identified tattoo copyright ownership as a "pressing issue."  In the absence of a clear answer from the courts, the NFLPA has advised its player members to seek copyright waivers from their tattoo artists.

Clearly, the ink has not fully dried on this issue.  Further developments will be reported in future editions.

Miguel Cotto v. Sergio Martinez

Speaking of tattoos, Top Rank Inc., the leading boxing promoter and our longtime client, recently announced the upcoming Miguel Cotto v. Sergio Martinez world middleweight title fight for June 7, 2014 in Madison Square Garden. Cotto will climb into the ring with a world class collection of tattoos on his muscular frame.

Tiny Antenna Dispute Transmits its Way to U.S. Supreme Court

In April, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear American Broadcasting Co. v. Aereo, a case that has significant implications for the television industry, which is being challenged by alternative content providers.  One of those alternative content providers is Aereo, which launched February 2012.  Aereo uses thousands of dime-sized antennas to pick up free, over-the-air TV signals, which it sends to customers via the Internet for a monthly subscription fee.  Aereo's users technically lease the tiny antennas, which are housed in nearby "antenna farms."

Shortly after commencing its operations, Aereo was sued by the major broadcasting networks, including CBS, NBC, FOX and ABC.  The networks claim that Aereo's service amounts to outright theft, since Aereo does not pay a retransmission fee to the networks.  Aereo has countered that it does not have to pay to retransmit network programming because it temporarily assigns each viewer an antenna at one of its antenna farms.  Thus, from Aereo's perspective, the Aereo service transmits "private performances" to individual viewers over their own licensed antenna, rather than copyright protected "public performances."

Lower courts are split on Aereo's legality.  The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York has ruled in favor of Aereo.  The ruling, however, was issued by a divided panel with the dissenting judge equating Aereo's system to a "Rube Goldberg-like contrivance, over engineered in an effort to avoid the reach of the Copyright Act and to take advantage of a perceived loophole in the law."  Other federal courts have ruled against Aereo's system forcing Aereo to shut down its operations in, among other locations, Denver and Salt Lake City.

If the U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of Aereo, that ruling could be the catalyst for an upheaval in the broadcast TV model, which is based on cable and satellite companies paying an estimated $4 billion in annual retransmission fees to the broadcasting networks.  Such a ruling could eventually result in the networks migrating their sporting events and other popular programming from free, over-the-air TV to pay TV channels (such as ESPN and HBO).  The NFL and Major League Baseball have warned that if Aereo receives a favorable ruling, broadcasts of events such as the Super Bowl and World Series may be moved to pay TV channels.

Please stay tuned to The Herrick Scorecard as the U.S. Supreme Court ruling will be reported in a future edition.

Do You Know the Way to San Jose? -- Part III

As we reported in prior editions, the City of San Jose filed an antitrust lawsuit against Major League Baseball in an effort to expedite the Oakland A's proposed relocation to San Jose.  The Oakland A's have been waiting for more than four years for a committee appointed by MLB Commissioner Selig to make a determination whether the relocation request should be submitted for a vote by the MLB Clubs.  In order to relocate, the approval of at least 75% of the MLB Clubs would be required.

U.S. District Court Judge Whyte batted down the City of San Jose's antitrust claim.  Since the date of our last edition, the City of San Jose has appealed Judge Whyte's decision to the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.  Further developments will be reported in future editions.

Washington Redskins Attract More Attention off the Field than on It -- Part II

As previously reported on in our last edition, Daniel Snyder, the owner of the Washington Redskins of the National Football League, has been besieged by a firestorm of pressure to change the team's name and logo.  Numerous groups have charged that the Redskins' name and logo are out of date, offensive and racist.  This controversy has not escaped the eye of President Obama who stated "If I were the owner of the team and I knew that there was a name of my team, even if it had a storied history, that was offending a sizeable group of people, I'd think about changing it."

Daniel Snyder has remained defiant despite the mounting criticism.  The most recent round of criticism has come from Senator Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and Representative Tom Cole (R-Okla.).  Ms. Cantwell is the chairperson of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, while Mr. Cole is a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee.  Mr. Cole is also a member of the Chickasaw Nation.  These legislators sent a letter to NFL Commissioner Goodell imploring the NFL to no longer ignore and perpetuate the use of the "Redskins" name -- a name they characterized as a racial slur.  In a subsequent interview, Ms. Cantwell stated that the Indian Affairs Committee would "definitely" examine the NFL's tax-exempt status as a means of applying pressure.  Further developments will be reported in future editions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions