United States: Supreme Court Issues Decision Analyzing Whether Misrepresentation Is "In Connection With" Purchase Or Sale Of Covered Security

Last Updated: March 13 2014
Article by Mark D. Cahn, Michael Mugmon and Laura K. Schwalbe

The United States Supreme Court issued a significant ruling that may present challenges to the Securities and Exchange Commission in pursuing some federal securities fraud claims and may open up some defendants to costly state court class actions.

On February 26, 2014, in Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice et al.,1 the Supreme Court narrowed the definition of "in connection with" as that term is used in the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA). SLUSA bars state law class actions in which the plaintiff alleges a misrepresentation or omission "in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security." The plaintiffs in a state law class action had alleged that they purchased certificates of deposit (uncovered securities) based on the misrepresentations that the certificates of deposit were backed by purchases and sales of covered securities. The Supreme Court held that a material misrepresentation is "in connection with" the purchase or sale of a covered security only if it makes a significant difference to someone's (other than the fraudster's) decision to purchase or sell a covered security.2
 
Because the certificates of deposit purchased by the class were not "covered securities," the 7-2 majority concluded that there was not a sufficient "connection" between the misrepresentations (which related to the fraudster's purported purchase or sale of securities) and any purchase or sale of covered securities by the aggrieved investors.3 As a result, SLUSA did not bar the state class action from continuing.
 
Although the Court interpreted the "in connection with" requirement of SLUSA, the same "in connection with" language appears in the key antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, the decision will have implications for both application of the restrictions imposed by SLUSA and the reach of the antifraud provisions of the 1934 Act.

The Decision

At issue in Chadbourne were four consolidated class actions involving plaintiffs who purchased certificates of deposit in the Stanford International Bank as part of former financier and cricket magnate Allen Stanford's multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme.4 These certificates of deposit were not traded on a national exchange or issued by an investment company. The plaintiffs alleged they were told that Stanford International Bank backed the certificates of deposit with nationally traded securities, making the certificates of deposit more secure.5 The four class actions alleged that the defendants (investment advisers, insurers, and law firms) helped Stanford carry out or conceal the fraud from regulators.6
 
SLUSA is a federal statute that precludes state law class actions alleging (1) misrepresentation or omission of material fact in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security; or (2) use of any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security.7 Covered securities are limited to those traded on a national exchange or issued by an investment company.8 The Court evaluated whether SLUSA precluded a state law class action based on misrepresentations relating to covered securities where the victims purchased certificates of deposit, but did not themselves directly purchase covered securities.9
 

The Court, in a 7-2 decision, narrowly interpreted the "in connection with" requirement in SLUSA, holding that "[a] fraudulent misrepresentation or omission is not made 'in connection with' such a 'purchase or sale of a covered security' unless it is material to a decision by one or more individuals (other than the fraudster) to buy or sell a 'covered security.'"10 The misrepresentations at issue concerned Stanford International Bank's purchase or sale of covered securities—the victims did not purchase or sell covered securities. Consequently, there was not a sufficient "connection" between the misrepresentations and the purchase or sale of covered securities.11 Justice Breyer, writing for the majority, gave several reasons for the decision:

  • the focus of SLUSA is on transactions involving covered securities;12  
  • a natural reading of SLUSA reveals that preclusion applies only when a misrepresentation is material to a decision to purchase or sell a covered, as opposed to uncovered, security;13  
  • prior cases alleging fraud in connection with purchase or sale of a security have all involved victims "who maintained an ownership interest in financial instruments that fall within the relevant statutory definition";14  
  • such a limit is consistent with the underlying statutes, the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which evince a focus on "transactions involving the statutorily relevant securities";15 and  
  • a broader interpretation of the connection would interfere with and limit a state's ability to address violations of state law frauds.16

Implications
 
As Justice Kennedy observed in the dissent, this new approach may restrict the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and civil litigants in their ability to use the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, as well as expose defendants to costly state law litigation. The new "ownership" rule, for instance, may pose challenges to the SEC where the vehicle in which victims invest is not itself a security under the federal securities laws, though that vehicle invests in securities.17 And though the facts presented by the Stanford matter were unusual—investors purchasing "uncovered securities" based on misrepresentations regarding "covered securities"—the dissent notes that fraudulent practices "constantly vary,"18 and that it is difficult to predict how this narrowing may frustrate enforcement efforts in the future.
 
Additionally, Chadbourne arguably represents a departure from prior Supreme Court jurisprudence. In decisions such as SEC v. Zandford,19 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit,20 and U.S. v. O'Hagan,21 the Court focused the "in connection" inquiry on whether the misrepresentation or omission "coincided" with a purchase or sale. Chadbourne requires, in addition, that the misrepresentation or omission cause someone other than the fraudster to purchase or sell a security. As the dissent observes, it is difficult to reconcile this new requirement with precedent such as O'Hagan, in which the entity "defrauded" was not the other party to the trade, but the fraudster's principal from whom confidential information was misappropriated.22 It will be interesting to see whether Chadbourne cabins the SEC in future insider trading cases, particularly where it might seek to expand the reach of the misappropriation theory.


*Mark Cahn and Michael Mugmon are partners and Laura Schwalbe is a senior associate at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP. Mr. Cahn, while serving as General Counsel for the SEC, was one of the authors of the amicus curiae brief filed by the Solicitor General and the SEC asking the US Supreme Court to deny the petitions for a writ of certiorari in the instant case. The views expressed by Mr. Cahn in this article are his own.


1 Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice et al., Nos. 12-79, 12-86, 12-88, slip op. (U.S. Feb. 26, 2014), available at http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-79_h3ci.pdf. The companion cases are Willis of Colorado Inc. et al. v. Troice et al. and Proskauer Rose LLP v. Troice et al.
2 Id. at 8-9.
3 Id. at 18-19.
4 Id. at 5.
5 Id. at 7, 18.
6 Id. at 6-7.
7 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(f).
8 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(f)(5)(E).
9 Chadbourne, slip op., at 8.
10 Id.
11 Id. at 18-19.
12 Id. at 9.
13 Id.
14 Id. at 9-10 (emphasis in original).
15 Id. at 11.
16 Id. at 12-13.
17 Chadbourne, slip op., at 16-17 (Kennedy, J. dissenting).
18 Id. at 11.
19 535 U.S. 813, 820 (2002).
20 547 U.S. 71, 85 (2006).
21 521 U.S. 643, 658 (1997).
22 Chadbourne, slip op., at 9-12 (Kennedy, J. dissenting).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Mark D. Cahn
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions