United States: Nine Thoughts On The Ninth Circuit’s "Innocence of Muslims" Copyright Decision

Last Updated: March 11 2014
Article by David A. Kluft

By now, you've probably heard the agonized shrieks of your friendly neighborhood copyright lawyer, decrying the Ninth Circuit's opinion Garcia v. Google. If you haven't had the time or inclination to read the opinion, here is a quick synopsis, followed by our list of nine ways in which many find the Ninth Circuit's February 26, 2014 decision somewhat troubling.


Cindy Lee Garcia agreed to act in a low budget film called "Desert Warrior," for which she was paid $500. The film she signed up for was never made, but the footage was repurposed into the now-infamous "Innocence of Muslims" trailer.  Garcia's voice was redubbed so that she appeared to be asking, "Is your Mohammed a child molester?"  When the trailer appeared on YouTube (owned by Google), Garcia became the subject of death threats, including even a fatwa from an Egyptian cleric.  Garcia filed eight DMCA takedown notices with YouTube, alleging copyright infringement.  When YouTube refused to remove the video, she sued the filmmakers for defamation and fraud, and also sued YouTube for copyright infringement.

Garcia filed a motion for injunctive relief, asking the District Court to force YouTube to take down the video. The District Court refused on the grounds that, even by Garcia's own admission, she was not an author or co-author of the film, and therefore had no legitimate copyright interest in it.  But on February 26, 2014, the Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that Garcia indeed probably had a protectable copyright interest in her 5-second performance in the trailer.  The Ninth Circuit ordered that the video be removed from YouTube. Since its release, this decision has received almost nothing but criticism.

Nine Troubling Things about the Ninth Circuit's Garcia v. Google Opinion

1. Authorship. Ownership of a copyright is vested in the first instance in the "author" of a "work." You can perform a work (e.g., play some music, read a poem, etc...), but that performance itself does not make you the author of a new copyrightable "work." The only work at issue here is the film. Traditionally, the author of a film is the director, producer, etc. – i.e., whoever makes the thing.  But Garcia, wishing to distance herself from the film's message, disavowed any assertion of authorship or joint-authorship and claimed copyright only in her own "performance."  The court, contrary to how copyright law has previously been interpreted, held that Garcia had some vague novel species of copyright authorship in her performance, as distinct from the film.

2. Fixation. In order for a work to be copyrightable, it has to be fixed by the author in a tangible medium of expression.  Here, the only fixation of Garcia's performance was in the film. Since Garcia didn't "fix" her performance independently, the court in effect borrows the fixation element from another author and another work, even though Garcia disavows any relationship with that other author and work. The court tries to soften the unprecedented nature of its ruling by pointing out that "pantomime and choreographic" works are independently copyrightable.  However, these types of work still need to be "fixed" by the author in order to be enforceable, for example in diagrams or in written descriptions.

3. Work for Hire. As the court acknowledges, most individual contributions to a film are considered works for hire, meaning that the copyright in the creative contribution belongs to the employer. This is often governed by contract, but just as often is governed by long-held assumptions about how copyright and employment law work. Here, the Court effectively held that only persons engaged in the "regular business" of filmmaking can take advantage of the work for hire doctrine in the movie context.  Otherwise, the court said (I'm not making this up), "every schmuck with a video camera becomes a movie mogul."

4. Practical Implications. The practical implications of the decision are potentially enormous.  Every person who appears in a movie or a photograph would have a potential separable copyright interest in their performance — distinct and in addition to their right of publicity. Would this new performance right be worth anything?  Maybe not. But it would be enough to issue a DMCA takedown notice.  Mom, take down those baby pictures of me from your Facebook page!  They make me look pudgy and besides, I own the copyright in my performance!

5. Just Contract Around It! The majority actually recognizes that what it has done will leave films and other collaborative works "entangled in an impenetrable thicket of copyright."  However, the court basically excuses this potential havoc by stating that "it rarely comes to that because copyright interests in the vast majority of films are covered by contract . . ."  In other words: if you think this opinion is crazy, don't worry, because you can contract around it.

6. Is this really going to help Ms. Garcia?  There is little doubt that this was a results-driven opinion. The court admitted as much, noting that since Ms. Garcia had received credible death threats, it was "best to err on the side of life."  This is certainly a legitimate concern.  However, the court fails to make a convincing case that removing the video from YouTube will nullify the death threats or cause the fatwa to be lifted.

7. The Balance of Equities. In balancing the equities, the court properly considered Garcia's legitimate interest in her physical safety.  However, on the other side, the court considered the bad acts of the filmmakers. What's wrong with this equation is that the filmmakers are not the parties being enjoined. Moreover, the court refused to give credence to YouTube's First Amendment arguments on the ground that the First Amendment doesn't protect copyright infringement.

8. This Isn't Really About Copyright. And that brings us to the real crux of the matter. Ms. Garcia's complaint is not really about copyright in the first place. There has been a spate of recent cases and disputes in which copyright law has been used as a cover for claims that in reality are about defamation, privacy, trademark infringement, the right of publicity or simply  where someone is trying to erase speech they don't like. In the case of YouTube, it has separate voluntary takedown policies for trademark infringement, defamation, privacy violations and harassment. So why is everyone trying to use copyright law instead? Probably because copyright law, unlike those other causes of action, give you the means to force a third party involuntarily to take down material from the internet quickly and without First Amendment concerns.  Here, Garcia's real problem was what the film did to her reputation and privacy interests. Only by a rather unusual interpretation of the Copyright Act has this tort claim against the filmmakers been transformed into a copyright claim against YouTube.

9. What about Fair Use? Even if there is such a thing as a separable copyright in performance, what about a fair use?  The Innocence of Muslims has become a legitimate topic of political, religious and cultural debate worldwide. Is the use of Garcia's 5-second appearance enough to completely stifle global criticism, commentary and scholarship?  And there is little doubt that the court's aim, far from simply dealing with a single instance of copyright infringement, has been to do exactly that. In fact, the court kept its order secret for several days before its release, expressly in order "to prevent a rush to copy and proliferate the film before Google can comply with the order." In other words, to try to prevent the video's preservation by third parties, without regard to the fact that undoubtedly many of those third parties' uses would be protected by the fair use doctrine or the First Amendment.

YouTube's Motion for an Emergency Stay of the order was denied.  The company has already indicated its intention to move for en banc review of the decision.

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions