ARTICLE
4 February 2014

Tax Court Provides Color On "For Cause" Termination Under Code Section 83

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
Our tax law colleague, Jonathan Talansky, discusses a recent tax court decision discussing that dreaded concept of "substantial risk of forfeiture" under section 83 of the Internal Revenue Code.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

Our tax law colleague, Jonathan Talansky, discusses a recent tax court decision discussing that dreaded concept of "substantial risk of forfeiture" under section 83 of the Internal Revenue Code. As Jonathan writes, this case, Austin v. Commissioner, serves as a warning to taxpayers to make sure that their employment and employment-related agreements are drafted carefully, and that self-serving language in those agreements that track the applicable tax regulations will not always hold sway when weighed against the substance of the arrangement. Read the full alert here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More