United States: Oregon Supreme Court Finds Goodwill Proceeds Excludable From Sales Factor

The Oregon Supreme Court has affirmed an Oregon Tax Court decision holding that a taxpayer's gross receipts from the sale of goodwill should be excluded from the sales factor used to compute its Oregon corporate excise (income) tax liability.1 In doing so, the Court clarified that for purposes of Oregon sales factor apportionment, an Oregon statute specifically excludes gross receipts from the sale of "intangible assets" (of which goodwill is classified) unless those gross receipts are derived from the taxpayer's primary business activity.2 The Court rejected the Tax Court's conclusion that "intangible assets" means only "liquid assets," and held that the term carries its ordinary meaning.


The taxpayer, a developer and seller of test, measurement and monitoring equipment, sold all of the assets of its printer division in 1999 to another corporation for approximately $925 million. Of that total sale price, roughly $590 million represented the gross proceeds from intangible assets, which were comprised of seven different types of intangible assets, generally referred to in total as "goodwill." On its originally filed Oregon corporation income tax return for that year, the taxpayer excluded the $590 million from the calculation of its sales factor. If included, the amount would have significantly increased the taxpayer's Oregon corporation income tax liability.

For the 2002 tax year, the taxpayer filed state and federal tax returns and reported a net capital loss. For federal income tax purposes, the taxpayer sought to carry back and apply that loss to its 1999 federal income tax obligation. In 2005, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a federal audit Revenue Agent's Report (RAR), which adjusted the amount of the original 2002 tax year loss. At that time, the taxpayer filed an amended 1999 Oregon corporation income tax return and claimed a net capital loss carryback based on the reduced net capital loss reflected in the 2005 RAR. The taxpayer applied the loss against its original 1999 Oregon tax obligation.

After receiving the amended return, the Oregon Department of Revenue permitted the taxpayer to apply the net capital loss carryback against its 1999 tax liability, but also recomputed the taxpayer's Oregon tax liability including the proceeds from the sale of goodwill in the computation of the taxpayer's sales factor for apportionment purposes, thus resulting in a tax assessment of $3.3 million.

The taxpayer challenged this assessment in the Oregon Tax Court on the basis that the Oregon statute of limitations prevented the Department from assessing additional tax based on the change in the sales factor. The Tax Court granted the taxpayer's motion and denied a cross-motion from the Department claiming that the statute of limitations had restarted because of the issuance of the 2005 RAR. The parties then entered into a settlement agreement which allowed the Department to appeal the statute of limitations and sales factor issues.

Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Summary Judgment

In affirming the Tax Court's decision, the Oregon Supreme Court never reached the issue of whether the statute of limitations prevented the Department from imposing additional tax as a result of the sales factor issue. Rather, the Supreme Court concentrated on the substantive issue regarding how to apportion business income under Oregon's version of the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (UDITPA).3 The determination of whether allocation or apportionment is appropriate generally is based on the UDITPA definitions of "business income" and "nonbusiness income."4 Oregon statutes define business income as "income arising from transactions and activity in the regular course of the taxpayer's trade or business and includes income from tangible and intangible property if the acquisition, the management, use or rental, and the disposition of the property constitute integral parts of the taxpayer's regular trade or business."5 For the tax year at issue, business income was apportioned to Oregon via a formula consisting of a property factor, a payroll factor and a double-weighted sales factor.6

At issue in this case was whether the proceeds from the sale of intangibles should be included in the computation of the Oregon sales factor.7 The term "sales" includes all gross receipts of the taxpayer not subject to allocation as nonbusiness income.8 In addition, the statutory definition of "sales": (i) excludes gross receipts arising from the sale, exchange, redemption or holding of intangible assets, including but not limited to securities, unless those receipts are derived from the taxpayer's primary business activity; (ii) includes net gain from the sale, exchange or redemption of intangible assets not derived from the primary business activity of the taxpayer but included in the taxpayer's business income; and (iii) excludes gross receipts arising from an incidental or occasional sale of a fixed asset or assets used in the regular course of the taxpayer's trade or business if a substantial amount of the gross receipts of the taxpayer arise from an incidental or occasional sale or sales of fixed assets used in the regular course of the taxpayer's trade or business.9

Specifically, the Supreme Court focused on whether the gross proceeds from the intangible assets sold constituted "sales" for purposes of determining the Oregon sales factor. The Department argued that since the printer division was central to the taxpayer's primary business activity, the proceeds from such division should be characterized as receipts derived from the taxpayer's primary business activity includable in the sales factor calculation.10 In its analysis, the Supreme Court focused on the applicable statute and related definition of "intangible assets,"11 noting the narrow meaning of that term identified by the Tax Court. Though the Supreme Court considered the Department's position, which was reliant upon: (i) legislative history; (ii) a model regulation adopted by the Multistate Tax Commission; and (iii) other 1999 legislative testimony, it ultimately determined that the term "intangible assets" as used in Or. Rev. Stat. Section 314.665(6)(a) is not limited to include only liquid assets.

Thus, the Supreme Court concluded that the $590 million received by the taxpayer as gross proceeds from the sale of intangible assets met this statutory definition, so those receipts must be excluded from the sales factor unless the receipts were derived from the taxpayer's primary business activity. Despite the fact that the printer division was central to the taxpayer's primary business of manufacturing and distributing electronic products, the sale of that division itself was not the taxpayer's business activity. No evidence was presented by the Department to support its assertion that the taxpayer's primary business was engaging in the sale of its divisions. The Court determined that the $590 million was required to be excluded from the sales factor as those receipts were derived from the sale of intangible assets which were not from the taxpayer's primary business activity.

The Supreme Court's analysis contrasted with that of the Tax Court, which had determined that the term "intangible assets" was generally intended to include only liquid assets associated with a taxpayer's treasury function. Specifically focusing its attention on the legislative record surrounding the adoption of Or. Rev. Stat. Section 314.665(6), the Tax Court noted that there was no indication that the legislation went beyond the treatment of treasury function receipts or addressed the receipts from all sales of intangible property. Concluding that neither Or. Rev. Stat. Section 314.665(6)(a) nor (6)(b) could be a basis for including some or all of the receipts from the taxpayer's disposition of goodwill in the computation of the sales factor, the Tax Court looked to regulatory guidance governing how to treat proceeds from sales of intangible property for sales factor purposes.

In concluding that that proceeds from the sale of goodwill was excludible, the Tax Court focused on a Department regulation providing that if business income from an intangible asset cannot readily be attributed to a particular business activity of the taxpayer, the proceeds from the sale of that intangible asset must be excluded from the calculation of the sales factor, to exclude the proceeds from the sale of goodwill from the taxpayer's sales factor computation.12 In its decision, the Tax Court noted that "the goodwill at issue here is a composite of all of the business activities of a taxpayer over time and in all locations where the business of the taxpayer is carried on. . . . That being the case, it is the conclusion of the court that the amount paid by the purchaser to taxpayer in this case cannot 'readily' be attributed to any particular income producing activity."13


This case is interesting in that it specifically focuses on the treatment of proceeds from the sale of goodwill for sales factor purposes. Despite the substantial sums often attributed to goodwill in sales transactions, little specific guidance exists with respect to the treatment of related proceeds for sales factor purposes. Although many states provide rules and limited guidance regarding the treatment of proceeds from sales of intangible assets in general, most do not specifically address goodwill. Presumably, since many states, like Oregon, rely on statutory language similar to that suggested by UDITPA and source proceeds from readily identifiable income producing activities based on the location of the related activity or where its benefit is received, the results here have potential wide-reaching effect.

Besides the specific treatment of goodwill proceeds, the following ancillary issues are evident from the case:

  1. Though this case specifically deals with the treatment of gross proceeds from the sale of goodwill, it is possible that the conclusion could apply to proceeds from sales of other intangible assets as well, especially since relevant statutory language does not typically distinguish between goodwill and other intangible assets. For example, proceeds from the sale of patents, copyrights and other intangible assets could also potentially be excluded from the sales factor computation based on similar reasoning.
  2. It is notable that since the relevant time period in this case, some changes have occurred which could have potentially changed its outcome. For example, an administrative rule that has since been promulgated in Oregon now lists seven specific criteria used to determine a taxpayer's primary business activity.14 Had this rule been in existence for the tax period in issue, certainly the Court would have focused much more attention on whether the proceeds from the sale of goodwill were derived from the taxpayer's primary business activity and were, therefore, necessarily includable in the taxpayer's sales factor computation.
  3. The statutory exclusion from the sales factor computation for a substantial amount of gross receipts from an incidental or occasional sale in Oregon applies specifically to fixed assets used in the regular course of the taxpayer's trade or business. Though the taxpayer asserted at the Tax Court level that its goodwill was a fixed asset, the Tax Court never reached the merits of this argument, and it is entirely conceivable that the term "fixed" could be construed to require that the asset is tangible in nature. Even so, it would be interesting to see what conclusions other courts might reach based on this reasoning.
  4. Though the taxpayer in this instance did not assert that the proceeds from the sale of its goodwill were allocable nonbusiness income, it is not difficult to imagine a taxpayer with a similar fact pattern making such assertion. This argument would have led to a very different analysis by the Court and potentially a different conclusion.
  5. The discussions by both the Tax Court and the Supreme Court in this instance provide detailed commentary regarding whether intangibles include more than simply liquid assets. Potential implications of including goodwill and other "non-liquid" assets in this category could include both property tax and sales tax issues, depending on particular definitions and their applicability in various jurisdictions.

With the increased level of corporate transaction activity over the past several years, corporations receiving proceeds from the sale of goodwill should carefully analyze this decision and consider whether it could have any potential impact on their state income tax liability or tax provision.


1 Tektronix, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, Oregon Supreme Court, No. SC S060912, Dec. 12, 2013.

2 OR. REV. STAT. § 314.665(6)(a).

3 OR. REV. STAT. §§ 314.605-314.675.

4 See Crystal Communications, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 297 P.3d 1256 (Or. 2013). Under UDITPA, whether income is allocated or apportioned depends on whether that income is classified under the statute as "business income" or "nonbusiness income."

5 OR. REV. STAT. § 314.610(1).

6 OR. REV. STAT. § 314.650(1). The current version of the statute no longer includes the property or payroll factors. Instead, apportionment is based solely upon the sales factor.

7 The Oregon sales factor is a fraction, the numerator of which is the taxpayer's total sales in Oregon during the tax period, while the denominator is the taxpayer's total sales everywhere during the tax period. OR. REV. STAT. § 314.665(1).

8 OR. REV. STAT. § 314.610(7).

9 OR. REV. STAT. § 314.665(6)(a)-(c).

10 After a review of the legislative history surrounding the enactment of OR. REV. STAT. § 314.665(6)(a), the Tax Court had determined that the exclusion of "intangible assets" found in the statute referred only to "liquid assets" (i.e., those assets held to provide a relatively immediate source of funds to satisfy the liquidity needs of the trade or business). Tektronix, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, Oregon Tax Court, No. TC 4951, June 5, 2012.

11 "Intangible asset" broadly means "any nonphysical asset or resource that can be amortized or converted to cash, such as patents, goodwill, and computer programs, or a right to something, such as services paid for in advance." Black's Law Dictionary 134 (9th ed. 2009).

12 OR. ADMIN. R.150-314.665(4)(3).

13 Tektronix, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, Oregon Tax Court, No. TC 4951, June 5, 2012.

14 OR. ADMIN. R.150-314.665(6)(3), effective Dec. 31, 2000.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.