United States: The Ten Most Significant Class Action Cases Of 2013

Last Updated: January 6 2014
Article by Andrew J. Trask

2013 did not offer the blockbuster docket in front of the Supreme Court that 2011 did, but that didn't stop the Court from issuing a number of opinions whose effects will be felt for some time to come. In addition, a number of other courts took bold steps to either support or constrain class action practice. The key trends coming out of 2013: watch out for predominance, and watch out for tricky settlement provisions. Also, pay attention to the complaint; key flaws can still lurk in there.

  1. Comcast Corp v. Behrend (Supreme Court). This case was supposed to be a re-examination of the standard used for expert testimony in class certification. Instead, it became a restatement of the importance of the predominance requirement, and resurrected the idea that variations in damages can defeat class certification. It also sparked a debate among circuit courts about when common issues predominate that all but guarantees the Supreme Court will weigh in again in the next year or two.
  2. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant (Supreme Court). Behrend may have caused more debate among courts, but this opinion invited more vitriol from plaintiffs' counsel. After AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, plaintiffs experimented with defeating arbitration clauses by arguing that only a litigated class action could vindicate their rights; basically, they relied on the justification for class actions as cost-effective for small-dollar claims. A divided Supreme Court roundly rejected that argument, and, in the process, reminded courts that (a) there is no due process right to a class action, and (b) class actions are supposed to be difficult to bring.
  3. Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk (Supreme Court). The offer of judgment under Rule 68 has been controversial in class action practice for some time. When the Supreme Court weighed in on its use in FLSA collective actions, it refrained from extending its reasoning to Rule 23. Nonetheless, lower courts have begun to apply the Court's ruling in class actions, once again setting the issue up for further review
  4. Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles (Supreme Court). The Supreme Court's opinion in Knowles tied up an annoying potential loophole in CAFA jurisdiction. But the way in which the unanimous court did it--by reaffirming that a named plaintiff does not represent anyone but herself until a class is certified--helps cut off other annoying tactics that plaintiffs use based on the entity theory" of class actions. At this point, the Supreme Court has made it clear that, until certification, a class action is just an individual lawsuit.
  5. Carrera v. Bayer Corp. (3d Cir.). Plaintiffs have often argued that a class action is ascertainable based only on class members' recollections of their participation, an argument hard to defend against because no defendant wants to imply that its customers are fundamentally dishonest. The Third Circuit has made it easier for defendants to hold plaintiffs to they burden, by stressing that it is in fact plaintiffs' burden to meet. If the defendants don't have the records, a class action may not be ascertainable.
  6. Radcliffe v. Experian Info. Solutions Inc. (9th Cir.). One of the problems with class action practice in general is that class counsel, rather than the named plaintiffs, often control the litigation. That's frustrating when the litigation is adversarial, but it's downright dangerous during settlement, when the named plaintiff is often the only thing protecting the class from counsel's self-interest. In Radcliffe, the Ninth Circuit reined in the use of "incentive awards" that aligned the named plaintiffs' interests with their counsel instead of the absent class members. This is one of a number of cases that will likely be useful for objectors in fighting bad class settlements.
  7. Feder v. Frank (9th Cir.). CAFA was supposed to reduce the number of bad deals for absent class members from coupon settlements. In Feder, the court reversed approval of a settlement that was using the latest method of inflating settlements for inflated fees: combining nominal injunctive relief with low-value coupons.
  8. Critchfield Physical Therapy, P.C. v. Techhealth, Inc. (E.D. Mo.). Another court in the Eastern District of Missouri found a different way of ensuring that the named plaintiff exercises some influence over settlement: make sure that the named plaintiff actually shows up to the settlement negotiations.
  9. Duvio v. Viking Range Corp. (E.D. La.). One source of early conflict in class actions is when plaintiffs--either through inexperience or tactics--neglect to include vital information in their pleadings. That lack led to the Supreme Court's "plausibility" opinions in Twombly and Iqbal, but it is also beginning to backfire on plaintiffs in class action pleadings. Duvio, which granted defendant's motion to strike, establishes a lower limit to how vague plaintiffs can get in a class action pleading.
  10. Pileggi v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA (N.D. Cal.). Some plaintiffs will seek injunctive relief in addition to (or instead of) monetary damages because they perceive it to be easier to certify a class under Rule 23(b)(2) than 23(b)(3). Judge Alsup's opinion denying certification in Pileggi is likely to be influential given its cogent discussion of the many drawbacks to thoughtlessly seeking declaratory or injunctive relief.

Careful readers may notice a few omissions in this list. Where, for example, is the Amgen opinion on securities class actions? Or some of the cy pres opinions that courts have begun to hand down? These tend to come down to judgment calls. From my experience with securities class actions, no defendants were really relying on the argument advanced in Amgen, and no one was particularly surprised or affected by the outcome. The Supreme Court has sent a signal about cy pres relief (and some courts have started doing interesting things), but there has been no overarching opinion that threatens to redefine the current practice. Maybe next year.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions