United States: FDIC Board Releases Single Point Of Entry Resolution Strategy For Public Comment

On December 18, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") published a widely anticipated notice in the Federal Register (the "Notice") setting forth the FDIC's single point of entry strategy ("SPOE") for resolutions under the Orderly Liquidation Authority ("OLA") contained in Title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") and requesting comment.1 The FDIC has viewed SPOE as a preferred resolution strategy for over a year.2The release provides greater detail regarding the strategy as well as issues that have been identified with respect to it.

Purpose of the Strategy

OLA was designed to deal with the "too big to fail" problem that became apparent in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. In essence, OLA provides a back-up authority to place systemically important financial institutions ("SIFI") into an FDIC receivership process if there is no private sector alternative to prevent the SIFI's default and if the SIFI's resolution under the US Bankruptcy Code would have serious adverse effects on the financial stability of the United States. Although the Dodd-Frank Act does not specify how the resolution of a SIFI should be structured, it does establish certain policy goals and parameters, including that taxpayers not make payments for losses3 and that management and board members be held accountable for the failure.4

The SPOE Approach Generally

SPOE is a recapitalization resolution strategy that looks to take advantage of the fact that US SIFIs predominantly are organized under a holding company structure with a top-tier parent holding company and operating subsidiaries. Under the SPOE approach described in detail in the Notice, upon failure of a SIFI, the parent holding company would be put into an FDIC receivership under OLA with the SIFI's bank, broker-dealer and other operating subsidiaries remaining open for business. The key to the SPOE approach is that, upon the parent holding company being placed into receivership, the FDIC would organize a bridge financial company into which it would transfer the assets of the failed parent holding company's estate, including ownership interests in, and intercompany loans to, the operating subsidiaries.

Steps to Execution

Transfer to Bridge Company

As described by the Notice, although the assets of the parent holding company would be transferred to the new bridge company, the equity, long-term unsecured debt and other similar liabilities of the failed parent holding company would remain in the existing holding company in the receivership.5 Recognizing that an absolute break between the assets and liabilities of the existing parent holding company could engender market-related risks, the SPOE contemplates that certain obligations of the holding company could be transferred to the bridge financial company to facilitate its operation and mitigate systemic risk. The Notice mentions that, among the obligations that could be transferred to the bridge company are obligations that are similar to "critical vendor" obligations that are approved as a matter of standard practice as "first day" orders in chapter 11 cases.6

Structure of Bridge Company

The FDIC, upon its appointment as receiver of the failed holding company, would adopt articles of association and bylaws for the bridge financial company. The FDIC would then establish a board of directors and chairman from "a pre-screened pool of eligible candidates," which in turn would appoint a CEO of the bridge financial company from pre-screened candidates and other experienced senior managers.7

Although, consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act's view that management responsible for the failure of the institution should feel the effects of the failure, senior management will have been replaced, the FDIC "expects that the bridge financial company would retain most of the employees in order to maintain the appropriate skills and expertise to operate the businesses and most employees of subsidiaries and affiliates would be unaffected."8 The FDIC would also retain control over certain key high-level governance matters, including stock issuance, dividend distributions and board changes.9

Addressing the Problem

As part of the process described in the Notice, measures would be taken to address the problems that led to the failure. Such measures could include, among other things, the divestiture or discontinuance of certain business lines with the potential that the "restructuring of the firm might result in one or more smaller companies that would be able to be resolved under bankruptcy without causing significant adverse effect to the US economy."10

Planning with respect to these measures would begin at the outset of the proceeding. In this regard, the Notice indicates that in connection with the formation of the bridge financial company, the FDIC would require the company to enter into an initial operating agreement requiring certain actions including, among others:

(i) review of the risk management policies and practices of the SIFI that led to the failure and prompt development of a plan to address them;

(ii) preparation and delivery of a business plan for the bridge financial company (including asset disposition strategies);

(iii) preparation of a capital, liquidity and funding plan consistent with the terms of any mandatory repayment plan and the capital and liquidity requirements established by regulators with respect to the SIFI's operating entities;

(iv) retention of FDIC-approved accounting and valuation consultants; and

(v) preparation of a restructuring plan to make the emerging company resolvable under the US Bankruptcy Code.11

Orderly Liquidation Fund

By establishing the bridge financial company with significant assets of the parent holding company, but no (or few) liabilities, it is expected that the bridge financial company would have a strong balance sheet that would put it in a strong position to borrow money from customary market sources. If, however, those customary sources are not immediately available, the FDIC has indicated that it may provide guarantees backed by its authority to obtain funding through the Orderly Liquidation Fund ("OLF"), or even secured funding directly from the OLF. 12

These obligations would, however, "only be issued in limited amounts for a brief transitional period in the initial phase of the resolution process and would be repaid promptly once access to private funding resumed."13

All OLF advances would be secured by liens on assets of the bridge financial company and its subsidiaries. If the pledged assets ever proved insufficient to fully repay the OLF advances, the FDIC would "impose risk-based assessments on eligible financial companies" to ensure that any OLF assets are repaid without loss to the taxpayer."14 Operating subsidiaries could be recapitalized as necessary via the bridge financial company's contribution of assets (or forgiveness of intercompany loans).15

Claims Process

OLA requires the FDIC to conduct a claims process and establishes a claims priority pyramid for the satisfaction of claims without the use of taxpayer funds.16 Following the claims process, claims against the receivership would be satisfied through a debt-for-securities exchange in accordance with their priority under OLA through the issuance of debt and equity in a new holding company. Prior to the exchange of securities for claims, the FDIC would determine the value of the bridge financial company based upon a valuation performed by the consultants selected by the board of the bridge financial company. The FDIC has indicated that "[c]ontingent value rights, such as warrants or options allowing the purchase of equity in [the new holding company] or other instruments, might be issued to enable claimants in impaired classes to recover value in the event that the approved valuation point underestimates the market value of the company."17


The FDIC expects that the bridge financial company would be ready to execute the debt-for-securities exchange within six to nine months of the commencement of the OLA proceedings. The termination of the bridge financial company, however, would only occur after the FDIC has approved the restructuring plan, and it is clear that the new holding company would meet or exceed regulatory capital requirements.18

Provision of Information

The Notice indicates that in implementing the SPOE proposal, the FDIC would "provide the best available information regarding the financial condition of the bridge financial company to creditors of the covered financial company." Further, the bridge financial company would comply with all disclosure and reporting requirements under applicable securities laws; although, if audited financial statements are not available, the FDIC would work with the Securities and Exchange Commission to set appropriate disclosure standards.19


SPOE has emerged as the FDIC's preferred OLA resolution strategy in large part because of the advantages it has over other alternatives (namely, sale and liquidation and wind-down strategies) and the fact that it solves many of the resolution impediments that have been identified since the Dodd-Frank Act's enactment. In this regard, although a resolution strategy for a SIFI that contemplates a sale (rather than capitalization) of material assets to a third party has appealing aspects, it faces the fundamental challenge that there may not be acquirers with the desire and financial strength to make the acquisition even if their regulators were willing to permit such an acquisition to go forward.

A resolution strategy that contemplates a full liquidation and wind-down resolution strategy also has a number of significant risks and challenges, including, among other things, that it can be time-consuming and result in the loss of going concern value for creditors and the loss of critical services provided by the SIFI to the overall economy. In contrast to those approaches, the FDIC believes that an SPOE recapitalization can be accomplished relatively quickly, will allow the continued operation of key businesses, and is not dependent on a willing and able acquirer.

Although the SPOE strategy eliminates many of the concerns of other strategies, an SPOE strategy is not itself without issues and impediments. Among the major impediments is the risk that the effectiveness of the SPOE strategy could be impaired by the potential for ring fencing by non-US authorities that have jurisdiction over a SIFI or its assets. To address that risk, the Notice suggests that a multiple point of entry ("MPOE") resolution strategy could be utilized as an alternative. As described, the MPOE strategy would involve positioning multiple levels of holding companies in various jurisdictions that could then be used as a point of entry in the event of a crisis.20

Request for Comments

The Notice specifically requests comment on several of its key provisions, including:

Disparate Treatment

Under the OLA, a creditors' committee is not appointed and creditor approval is not necessary for the FDIC to treat similarly situated creditors differently. In addition to the protections afforded creditors under the Dodd-Frank Act,21 the FDIC, in response to concerns regarding the possibility that stakeholders could receive disparate treatment, points to the fact that it has instituted regulations that limit its discretion to treat similarly situated creditors differently.22 The Notice solicits comments "on whether there should be further limits or other ways to assure creditors of our prospective use of disparate treatment."23

Use of the OLF

In the Notice, the FDIC recognizes that, to the extent that the SPOE solution contains the possibility that funds from the OLF may be utilized, the whole approach "might be considered equivalent to a public 'bail-out" of the company." Accordingly, the Notices seeks comments "on the FDIC's efforts to address the liquidity needs of the bridge financial company."24

Funding Advantages of SIFIs

The Notice notes that SIFIs have a perceived funding advantage over smaller competitors arising from a market expectation that SIFIs would be bailed out if they failed. The Notice indicates the FDIC's belief that the SPOE proposal potentially would limit the perceived advantage by making it clear that, upon the failure of a SIFI, loses would be imposed upon shareholders and unsecured creditors. The FDIC solicits commenters' views on this perceived funding advantage and specifically whether: (i) the potential to use OLF creates a funding advantage; (ii) any potential funding advantage would contribute to consolidation among the banking industry that would not otherwise occur; and (iii) there are any other measures and methods that can be used to address the perceived funding advantage.25

Capital and Debt Levels at the Holding Company

The SPOE approach only would be a viable solution if the recapitalization at the parent company level would generate sufficient value to allow for any necessary flow of assets to the subsidiary level. The Notice, therefore, seeks comment on capital issues, including the "amount of equity and unsecured debt that would be needed to effectuate a SPOE resolution and establish a [new bridge financial company]," as well as comment on the types of debt and maturity structures that "would be optimal to effectuate a SPOE resolution."26

Treatment of Foreign Operations of the Bridge Financial Company

The Notice indicates that it would welcome comments on "whether a subsidiarization requirement would facilitate the resolution of a SIFI under the MPOE or SPOE strategies or under the Bankruptcy Code," as well as "the impact a branch structure might have on a banking organization's ability to withstand adverse economic conditions that do not threaten the viability of the group."27

Cross-Border Treatment

The FDIC details steps that it has taken with respect to cross-border coordination, including the development of certain cross-border relationships and working groups, and "welcomes comment on the most important additional steps that can be taken with foreign regulatory authorities to achieve a successful resolution using the SPOE strategy."28

In addition to the issues identified above, the FDIC is soliciting comments on: (i) whether "there are particular creditors or groups of creditors for whom the securities-for-claims exchange strategy would present a particular difficulty or be unreasonably burdensome; (ii) whether "the issuance to creditors of contingent value securities, such as warrants, can be an effective tool to accommodate inevitable uncertainties in valuation" and what characteristics would be useful in structuring such securities; (iii) what financial reporting is the most important to claimants, the public and other stakeholders, and whether additional information about the administrative claims process would be useful; and (iv) whether there are there additional factors that should be considered in evaluating the effectiveness of SPOE or there are alternatives that would provide better results.29

Comments are due by February 18, 2014.


1 "Resolution of Systemically Import Financial Institutions: The Single Point of Entry Strategy," 78 Fed. Reg. 243 (December 18, 2013), pp. 76614-76624. A copy of the Notice is available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-12-18/pdf/2013-30057.pdf.

2 Notably, in May 2012, FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg indicated that SPOE is the FDIC's preferred resolution strategy under OLA. See Remarks by Martin J. Gruenberg Acting Chairman, FDIC to the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Bank Structure Conference (May 10, 2012), available at http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/speeches/chairman/spmay1012.html. The FDIC has also issued a joint paper with the Bank of England advocating SPOE (available athttp://www.fdic.gov/about/srac/2012/gsifi.pdf) and FDIC Chairman Gruenberg and Bank of England Deputy Governor for Financial Stability Paul Tucker have published an editorial in the Financial Times advocating the strategy (available at http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/fd66d172-3fd4-11e2-b0ce-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2nIajZxxV).

3 Title II states that "[t]axpayers shall bear no losses from the exercise of any authority under [Title II]." 12 U.S.C. § 5394(c).

4 See 12 U.S.C. § 5386(4)-(5).

5 The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the FDIC to establish a "bridge financial company" to temporarily succeed to selected assets and liabilities of the SIFI. 12 U.S.C. § 5390(h).

6 See Notice at p. 76622.

7 Id. at pp. 76616-76617.

8 Id. at p. 76617.

9 See id.

10 Id. at p. 76616.

11 See id. at p. 76617. 12 The Dodd-Frank Act provides for the OLF to serve as a back-up source of liquidity support.

12 U.S.C. § 5384(d).

13Notice at p. 76616.

14Id. at p. 76617.

15See id. at p. 76623.

16See id. at pp. 76617-76618.

17See id. at pp. 76618-76619.

18See id. at p. 76620.

19 See id. at pp. 76621-76622.

20 Id. at p. 76624.

21 The Dodd-Frank Act provides that each creditor must receive at least the same mount that they would have received if the FDIC had not been appointed as receiver and the company had been liquidated under chapter 7 of the US Bankruptcy Code. See 12 U.S.C. § 5390(b)(4). Further, disparate treatment is only permissible under the Dodd-Frank Act to the extent necessary to continue essential operations or maximize recoveries. See 12 U.S.C. § 5390(d)(4).

22 The FDIC has stated that it would not exercise its discretion in manner that would result in preferential treatment to holders of long-term senior debt, subordinated debt, or equity holders. See 12 CFR 380.27.

23 Notice at p. 76620.

24 Id.

25 See id. at pp. 76622-76623.

26 Id. at pp. 76623.

27 Id. at p. 76624.


29 Id.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions