United States: FDIC Board Releases Single Point Of Entry Resolution Strategy For Public Comment

On December 18, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") published a widely anticipated notice in the Federal Register (the "Notice") setting forth the FDIC's single point of entry strategy ("SPOE") for resolutions under the Orderly Liquidation Authority ("OLA") contained in Title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") and requesting comment.1 The FDIC has viewed SPOE as a preferred resolution strategy for over a year.2The release provides greater detail regarding the strategy as well as issues that have been identified with respect to it.

Purpose of the Strategy

OLA was designed to deal with the "too big to fail" problem that became apparent in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. In essence, OLA provides a back-up authority to place systemically important financial institutions ("SIFI") into an FDIC receivership process if there is no private sector alternative to prevent the SIFI's default and if the SIFI's resolution under the US Bankruptcy Code would have serious adverse effects on the financial stability of the United States. Although the Dodd-Frank Act does not specify how the resolution of a SIFI should be structured, it does establish certain policy goals and parameters, including that taxpayers not make payments for losses3 and that management and board members be held accountable for the failure.4

The SPOE Approach Generally

SPOE is a recapitalization resolution strategy that looks to take advantage of the fact that US SIFIs predominantly are organized under a holding company structure with a top-tier parent holding company and operating subsidiaries. Under the SPOE approach described in detail in the Notice, upon failure of a SIFI, the parent holding company would be put into an FDIC receivership under OLA with the SIFI's bank, broker-dealer and other operating subsidiaries remaining open for business. The key to the SPOE approach is that, upon the parent holding company being placed into receivership, the FDIC would organize a bridge financial company into which it would transfer the assets of the failed parent holding company's estate, including ownership interests in, and intercompany loans to, the operating subsidiaries.

Steps to Execution

Transfer to Bridge Company

As described by the Notice, although the assets of the parent holding company would be transferred to the new bridge company, the equity, long-term unsecured debt and other similar liabilities of the failed parent holding company would remain in the existing holding company in the receivership.5 Recognizing that an absolute break between the assets and liabilities of the existing parent holding company could engender market-related risks, the SPOE contemplates that certain obligations of the holding company could be transferred to the bridge financial company to facilitate its operation and mitigate systemic risk. The Notice mentions that, among the obligations that could be transferred to the bridge company are obligations that are similar to "critical vendor" obligations that are approved as a matter of standard practice as "first day" orders in chapter 11 cases.6

Structure of Bridge Company

The FDIC, upon its appointment as receiver of the failed holding company, would adopt articles of association and bylaws for the bridge financial company. The FDIC would then establish a board of directors and chairman from "a pre-screened pool of eligible candidates," which in turn would appoint a CEO of the bridge financial company from pre-screened candidates and other experienced senior managers.7

Although, consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act's view that management responsible for the failure of the institution should feel the effects of the failure, senior management will have been replaced, the FDIC "expects that the bridge financial company would retain most of the employees in order to maintain the appropriate skills and expertise to operate the businesses and most employees of subsidiaries and affiliates would be unaffected."8 The FDIC would also retain control over certain key high-level governance matters, including stock issuance, dividend distributions and board changes.9

Addressing the Problem

As part of the process described in the Notice, measures would be taken to address the problems that led to the failure. Such measures could include, among other things, the divestiture or discontinuance of certain business lines with the potential that the "restructuring of the firm might result in one or more smaller companies that would be able to be resolved under bankruptcy without causing significant adverse effect to the US economy."10

Planning with respect to these measures would begin at the outset of the proceeding. In this regard, the Notice indicates that in connection with the formation of the bridge financial company, the FDIC would require the company to enter into an initial operating agreement requiring certain actions including, among others:

(i) review of the risk management policies and practices of the SIFI that led to the failure and prompt development of a plan to address them;

(ii) preparation and delivery of a business plan for the bridge financial company (including asset disposition strategies);

(iii) preparation of a capital, liquidity and funding plan consistent with the terms of any mandatory repayment plan and the capital and liquidity requirements established by regulators with respect to the SIFI's operating entities;

(iv) retention of FDIC-approved accounting and valuation consultants; and

(v) preparation of a restructuring plan to make the emerging company resolvable under the US Bankruptcy Code.11

Orderly Liquidation Fund

By establishing the bridge financial company with significant assets of the parent holding company, but no (or few) liabilities, it is expected that the bridge financial company would have a strong balance sheet that would put it in a strong position to borrow money from customary market sources. If, however, those customary sources are not immediately available, the FDIC has indicated that it may provide guarantees backed by its authority to obtain funding through the Orderly Liquidation Fund ("OLF"), or even secured funding directly from the OLF. 12

These obligations would, however, "only be issued in limited amounts for a brief transitional period in the initial phase of the resolution process and would be repaid promptly once access to private funding resumed."13

All OLF advances would be secured by liens on assets of the bridge financial company and its subsidiaries. If the pledged assets ever proved insufficient to fully repay the OLF advances, the FDIC would "impose risk-based assessments on eligible financial companies" to ensure that any OLF assets are repaid without loss to the taxpayer."14 Operating subsidiaries could be recapitalized as necessary via the bridge financial company's contribution of assets (or forgiveness of intercompany loans).15

Claims Process

OLA requires the FDIC to conduct a claims process and establishes a claims priority pyramid for the satisfaction of claims without the use of taxpayer funds.16 Following the claims process, claims against the receivership would be satisfied through a debt-for-securities exchange in accordance with their priority under OLA through the issuance of debt and equity in a new holding company. Prior to the exchange of securities for claims, the FDIC would determine the value of the bridge financial company based upon a valuation performed by the consultants selected by the board of the bridge financial company. The FDIC has indicated that "[c]ontingent value rights, such as warrants or options allowing the purchase of equity in [the new holding company] or other instruments, might be issued to enable claimants in impaired classes to recover value in the event that the approved valuation point underestimates the market value of the company."17

Timing

The FDIC expects that the bridge financial company would be ready to execute the debt-for-securities exchange within six to nine months of the commencement of the OLA proceedings. The termination of the bridge financial company, however, would only occur after the FDIC has approved the restructuring plan, and it is clear that the new holding company would meet or exceed regulatory capital requirements.18

Provision of Information

The Notice indicates that in implementing the SPOE proposal, the FDIC would "provide the best available information regarding the financial condition of the bridge financial company to creditors of the covered financial company." Further, the bridge financial company would comply with all disclosure and reporting requirements under applicable securities laws; although, if audited financial statements are not available, the FDIC would work with the Securities and Exchange Commission to set appropriate disclosure standards.19

Challenges

SPOE has emerged as the FDIC's preferred OLA resolution strategy in large part because of the advantages it has over other alternatives (namely, sale and liquidation and wind-down strategies) and the fact that it solves many of the resolution impediments that have been identified since the Dodd-Frank Act's enactment. In this regard, although a resolution strategy for a SIFI that contemplates a sale (rather than capitalization) of material assets to a third party has appealing aspects, it faces the fundamental challenge that there may not be acquirers with the desire and financial strength to make the acquisition even if their regulators were willing to permit such an acquisition to go forward.

A resolution strategy that contemplates a full liquidation and wind-down resolution strategy also has a number of significant risks and challenges, including, among other things, that it can be time-consuming and result in the loss of going concern value for creditors and the loss of critical services provided by the SIFI to the overall economy. In contrast to those approaches, the FDIC believes that an SPOE recapitalization can be accomplished relatively quickly, will allow the continued operation of key businesses, and is not dependent on a willing and able acquirer.

Although the SPOE strategy eliminates many of the concerns of other strategies, an SPOE strategy is not itself without issues and impediments. Among the major impediments is the risk that the effectiveness of the SPOE strategy could be impaired by the potential for ring fencing by non-US authorities that have jurisdiction over a SIFI or its assets. To address that risk, the Notice suggests that a multiple point of entry ("MPOE") resolution strategy could be utilized as an alternative. As described, the MPOE strategy would involve positioning multiple levels of holding companies in various jurisdictions that could then be used as a point of entry in the event of a crisis.20

Request for Comments

The Notice specifically requests comment on several of its key provisions, including:

Disparate Treatment

Under the OLA, a creditors' committee is not appointed and creditor approval is not necessary for the FDIC to treat similarly situated creditors differently. In addition to the protections afforded creditors under the Dodd-Frank Act,21 the FDIC, in response to concerns regarding the possibility that stakeholders could receive disparate treatment, points to the fact that it has instituted regulations that limit its discretion to treat similarly situated creditors differently.22 The Notice solicits comments "on whether there should be further limits or other ways to assure creditors of our prospective use of disparate treatment."23

Use of the OLF

In the Notice, the FDIC recognizes that, to the extent that the SPOE solution contains the possibility that funds from the OLF may be utilized, the whole approach "might be considered equivalent to a public 'bail-out" of the company." Accordingly, the Notices seeks comments "on the FDIC's efforts to address the liquidity needs of the bridge financial company."24

Funding Advantages of SIFIs

The Notice notes that SIFIs have a perceived funding advantage over smaller competitors arising from a market expectation that SIFIs would be bailed out if they failed. The Notice indicates the FDIC's belief that the SPOE proposal potentially would limit the perceived advantage by making it clear that, upon the failure of a SIFI, loses would be imposed upon shareholders and unsecured creditors. The FDIC solicits commenters' views on this perceived funding advantage and specifically whether: (i) the potential to use OLF creates a funding advantage; (ii) any potential funding advantage would contribute to consolidation among the banking industry that would not otherwise occur; and (iii) there are any other measures and methods that can be used to address the perceived funding advantage.25

Capital and Debt Levels at the Holding Company

The SPOE approach only would be a viable solution if the recapitalization at the parent company level would generate sufficient value to allow for any necessary flow of assets to the subsidiary level. The Notice, therefore, seeks comment on capital issues, including the "amount of equity and unsecured debt that would be needed to effectuate a SPOE resolution and establish a [new bridge financial company]," as well as comment on the types of debt and maturity structures that "would be optimal to effectuate a SPOE resolution."26

Treatment of Foreign Operations of the Bridge Financial Company

The Notice indicates that it would welcome comments on "whether a subsidiarization requirement would facilitate the resolution of a SIFI under the MPOE or SPOE strategies or under the Bankruptcy Code," as well as "the impact a branch structure might have on a banking organization's ability to withstand adverse economic conditions that do not threaten the viability of the group."27

Cross-Border Treatment

The FDIC details steps that it has taken with respect to cross-border coordination, including the development of certain cross-border relationships and working groups, and "welcomes comment on the most important additional steps that can be taken with foreign regulatory authorities to achieve a successful resolution using the SPOE strategy."28

In addition to the issues identified above, the FDIC is soliciting comments on: (i) whether "there are particular creditors or groups of creditors for whom the securities-for-claims exchange strategy would present a particular difficulty or be unreasonably burdensome; (ii) whether "the issuance to creditors of contingent value securities, such as warrants, can be an effective tool to accommodate inevitable uncertainties in valuation" and what characteristics would be useful in structuring such securities; (iii) what financial reporting is the most important to claimants, the public and other stakeholders, and whether additional information about the administrative claims process would be useful; and (iv) whether there are there additional factors that should be considered in evaluating the effectiveness of SPOE or there are alternatives that would provide better results.29

Comments are due by February 18, 2014.

Footnote

1 "Resolution of Systemically Import Financial Institutions: The Single Point of Entry Strategy," 78 Fed. Reg. 243 (December 18, 2013), pp. 76614-76624. A copy of the Notice is available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-12-18/pdf/2013-30057.pdf.

2 Notably, in May 2012, FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg indicated that SPOE is the FDIC's preferred resolution strategy under OLA. See Remarks by Martin J. Gruenberg Acting Chairman, FDIC to the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Bank Structure Conference (May 10, 2012), available at http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/speeches/chairman/spmay1012.html. The FDIC has also issued a joint paper with the Bank of England advocating SPOE (available athttp://www.fdic.gov/about/srac/2012/gsifi.pdf) and FDIC Chairman Gruenberg and Bank of England Deputy Governor for Financial Stability Paul Tucker have published an editorial in the Financial Times advocating the strategy (available at http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/fd66d172-3fd4-11e2-b0ce-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2nIajZxxV).

3 Title II states that "[t]axpayers shall bear no losses from the exercise of any authority under [Title II]." 12 U.S.C. § 5394(c).

4 See 12 U.S.C. § 5386(4)-(5).

5 The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the FDIC to establish a "bridge financial company" to temporarily succeed to selected assets and liabilities of the SIFI. 12 U.S.C. § 5390(h).

6 See Notice at p. 76622.

7 Id. at pp. 76616-76617.

8 Id. at p. 76617.

9 See id.

10 Id. at p. 76616.

11 See id. at p. 76617. 12 The Dodd-Frank Act provides for the OLF to serve as a back-up source of liquidity support.

12 U.S.C. § 5384(d).

13Notice at p. 76616.

14Id. at p. 76617.

15See id. at p. 76623.

16See id. at pp. 76617-76618.

17See id. at pp. 76618-76619.

18See id. at p. 76620.

19 See id. at pp. 76621-76622.

20 Id. at p. 76624.

21 The Dodd-Frank Act provides that each creditor must receive at least the same mount that they would have received if the FDIC had not been appointed as receiver and the company had been liquidated under chapter 7 of the US Bankruptcy Code. See 12 U.S.C. § 5390(b)(4). Further, disparate treatment is only permissible under the Dodd-Frank Act to the extent necessary to continue essential operations or maximize recoveries. See 12 U.S.C. § 5390(d)(4).

22 The FDIC has stated that it would not exercise its discretion in manner that would result in preferential treatment to holders of long-term senior debt, subordinated debt, or equity holders. See 12 CFR 380.27.

23 Notice at p. 76620.

24 Id.

25 See id. at pp. 76622-76623.

26 Id. at pp. 76623.

27 Id. at p. 76624.

28Id.

29 Id.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions