United States: The Pharmacy Compounding Quality Act Of 2013: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed And Something Missing

Last Updated: December 9 2013
Article by Michael A. Walsh

Since 2002, the law governing pharmacy compounding (21 USC 353a) has suffered from a crippling constitutional defect. After a significant human tragedy which drew the attention of Congress, the Senate sent the Drug Quality and Security Act to the President for signature on November 18, 2013. Under Title I, the Compounding Quality Act (the Act) amends the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act ("FDCA") by inserting a new section, 21 USC 353b. According to Senator Michael Bennet, "[t]he legislation strikes unconstitutional provisions in current law, resolving the patchwork of current federal regulation and applying a uniform standard nationwide." ( See here).

The "unconstitutional provisions" relates to the "advertising and promotion" provisions that were declared unconstitutional in Thompson v. Western States, 535 US 357 (2002). The Supreme Court created further confusion when it failed to rule on whether the unconstitutional provision was severable from the rest of the law. In Thompson v. Western States, the Ninth Circuit struck the entire Pharmacy Compounding provision while the Fifth Circuit took a different view in Medical Center Pharmacy v. Mukasey, 536 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 2008), ruling the advertising prohibitions were severable.

Why Now?

Pharmacy compounding of medications predates the FDCA and is as old as the practice of medicine itself. In 2012, Massachusetts based New England Compounding Center ("NECC") found itself at the center of a meningitis outbreak linked to contaminated sterile injections that were ultimately linked to multiple deaths. Even though the federal law had been in a state of disarray for more than a decade, the NECC disaster could have been avoided by simply investigating the obvious warning signals for which the State of Massachusetts and the FDA had ample authority and power.

On November 15, 2012, after hearing emotional testimony from the family of a patient who had been exposed to a NECC product, Congress questioned Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") Commissioner Hamburg for failing to explain the FDA's authority to regulate and oversee the practice of compounding pharmacy generally and for failing to follow up on its 2002 warnings to NECC. (See here). On July 31, 2013, the Government Accountability Office recommended that Congress close the "gap" in FDA oversight caused by "compounding in large drugs quantities - in anticipation of individual prescriptions or without prescriptions where the drugs are sold across state lines rendering the practice drug manufacturing that should be overseen by FDA." (See GAO report here)

Until now, the medical industry has largely considered pharmacy compounding to be an adjunct to the practice of medicine, not pharmaceutical manufacturing. And since the practice did not fit neatly within the FDA's statutory or regulatory purview, regulation was reserved for the states. Long before the NECC debacle, the proliferation of large-scale compounding facilities increased, and now, the FDA has a framework to require larger compounding pharmacies to register and list what they are compounding, which it long maintained was in need of FDA oversight.

Something Old:

Congress has not rewritten the entire law or supplanted state oversight of pharmacy practice; instead, it has revived the former "pharmacy compounding" provisions in section 353a by deleting the prohibition against soliciting prescriptions in subsection (a) and deleting the "advertising and promotion" provision in subsection (c) in their entirety. As for large scale traditional compounding pharmacies the Compounding Quality Act returns the state of the law to 2002 by imposing the limitations for "inordinate amounts" and "5%" under 353a(b)(3)(B)(i-ii).

Something New – Outsourcing Facilities:

In earlier versions of the Act, Congress echoed the FDA's concerns with the notion of large-scale Compound Manufacturing, which is when pharmacies compound drugs in large quantities in anticipation of individual prescriptions or without prescriptions. The final version of the Act abandons the notion of "Compound Manufacturing" in favor of regulating a discrete class of "outsourcing facilities" defined as:

"The term 'outsourcing facility' means a facility at one geographic location or address that—(i) is engaged in the compounding of sterile drugs; (ii) has elected to register as an outsourcing facility; and (iii) complies with all of the requirements of this section. (B) An outsourcing facility is not required to be a licensed pharmacy. (C) An outsourcing facility may or may not obtain prescriptions for identified individual patients."

The election to register is a Hobson's choice since not "electing" to be an outsourcing facility subjects the facility producing sterile preparations to the rules on misbranding and new drugs. An outsourcing facility must register annually, pay a $15,000 registration fee upon making the election (unless if they have under $1M in sales, in which case they pay $5,000) and report annually to the FDA in June and December, identifying the drugs compounded. The FDA will conduct what are termed "risk-based" inspections under 21 USC 374. These inspections are the same as those for traditional drug manufacturers. The registration fee or "establishment fee" covers the cost of an inspection but the fee for each successive reinspection is $15,000.

The new law also subjects outsourcing facilities to the same records retention and adverse event reporting requirements under Subpart D of the regulations (21 CFR 310.305) that apply to traditional drug manufacturers. The failure to comply with the reporting requirements is considered a "prohibited act" subject to civil and criminal penalties (21 USC 331).

Something Borrowed:

The Act amends the drug misbranding provisions under 21 USC 353 to include compounded drugs. Borrowing from the rules governing approved drugs, a compounded drug is misbranded under the FDCA: "if the advertising or promotion of a compounded drug is false or misleading in any particular."

The Act now paves the way for increased use of the FDA's 2002 Compounding Policy Guide (CPG) for oversight of the promotion of pharmacy compounding products for both sterile and other compounded products. CPG Sec. 140.100 addresses the circumstances under which the FDA will seize books and other materials that constitute misleading labeling and states:

Printed material that promotes the use of a product is labeling within the meaning of the Act. Notwithstanding certain free speech protections, labeling including books can be regulated if it is false or misleading.

Something Missing:

The ongoing controversy over the pharmacy compounding provisions stemmed from the Supreme Court ruling in Western States. Congress purports to cure the First Amendment constitutional infirmity by simply erasing it. The problem with this approach is that it provides the FDA no road-map on how to regulate communications or product labeling. In enforcing the FDCA, the FDA assumes that a fundamental distinction exists under the First Amendment between truthful information and information the government declares "false," which is not entitled to protection. While the terms "false" and "misleading" are generally defined in the regulations (21 CFR 202.1), the FDA subscribes to the view of Justice Roberts in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964) that "it knows it when it sees it." Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel 471 U.S. 626, 646 (1985) is often cited by the government to support the notion that "false" speech is not afforded First Amendment protection. However, in U.S. v. Alvarez, 132 S. Ct. 2537 (2012), the Supreme Court rejected this notion stating that it "has never endorsed the categorical rule the Government advances: that false statements receive no First Amendment protection." The notion that "false" speech is not subject to First Amendment protection has only recently been rejected by the Supreme Court.

Since the advent of the FDCA in 1906, the government could rely on courts generally deferring to administrative determinations and, where the government declared a statement, label or advertisement to be false, it could proceed to enforcement without concern for Due Process or the First Amendment. But deference to agency determinations is also being reconsidered by the Supreme Court. For example, in Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp., the Supreme Court refused to defer to an agency's interpretation of ambiguous regulations, stating:

It is one thing to expect regulated parties to conform their conduct to an agency's interpretations once the agency announces them; it is quite another to require regulated parties to divine the agency's interpretations in advance or else be held liable when the agency announces its interpretations for the first time in an enforcement proceeding and demands deference.

In FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., the Supreme Court considered the issue of deference to regulatory agencies in the context of the First Amendment holding that the regulation failed under the Due Process Clause, because "regulated parties should know what is required of them so they may act accordingly;" and "precision and guidance are necessary so that those enforcing the law do not act in an arbitrary and discriminatory way."

The Road Ahead:

With passage (and likely signing) of the Act, little doubt remains that the FDA will now have significant oversight over sterile compounding facilities. The Act also provides the FDA, state regulators, and consumers with increased transparency on the scope of "unapproved" compounded sterile preparations on the market. Congress has even directed the FDA to issue regulations (not guidance) governing pharmacy compounding, but set no deadline for publication of any proposed rules. How the FDA will rein in the burgeoning business of non-sterile compounding, must now await the rulemaking process. In the meantime, the FDA has broad and sweeping new powers to treat pharmacies as drug manufacturers, and the new fees under the Act have the pharmacies paying for it.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Michael A. Walsh
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions