United States: ISS Releases 2013-2014 Policy Survey Results And Policy Updates

Last Updated: December 3 2013
Article by James J. Hanks, Jr. and Michael F. Sheehan

Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. ("ISS") recently released the results of its 2013-2014 Policy Survey (the "Survey"). The stated goal of its annual Survey is to gather feedback from its institutional investor clients regarding (a) the importance to them of various corporate governance issues and (b) ISS's manner of analyzing company data in making its proxy voting recommendations.

Further, on November 21, 2013, ISS released its annual policy update (the "Update"), which will inform ISS's proxy voting recommendations for annual meetings held on or after February 1, 2014. The Update reflects, to some degree, the results of the Survey. As always, we urge each company to identify the extent to which each of its major shareholders relies on ISS as this will provide valuable information to the company on the significance of ISS's recommendations and on any company outreach to shareholders.

Some of the results of the Survey and the Update are particularly important to Maryland public companies as they involve matters of Maryland statutory or case law.

1. Response to Shareholder-Approved Proposals. In a very welcome development, institutional investors overwhelmingly declared that a board of directors need not always implement a shareholder-approved precatory proposal. Fully 40% of investor respondents to the Survey indicated that a company's "board should be free to exercise its discretion to respond" to majority-supported shareholder proposals "in a manner that the board believes is in the best interest of the company" and to disclose the rationale for any actions it takes. An additional 24% of investor respondents replied that "it depends on the circumstances," thus wisely recognizing that shareholder views may be considered by, but are not binding on, the board. For many years, courts applying Maryland law have been clear that directors of Maryland corporations are not obligated to implement a shareholder-approved precatory proposal. See Martin Marietta Corp. v. Bendix Corp., 549 F. Supp. 623, 633 n.5 (D. Md. 1982), quoted in Mountain Manor Realty, Inc. v. Buccheri, 55 Md. App. 185, 197-98, 461 A.2d 45, 52-53 (1983); Warren v. Fitzgerald, 189 Md. 476, 489, 56 A.2d 827, 833 (1948) (quoting People ex rel. Manice v. Powell, 201 N.Y. 194, 201, 94 N.E. 634, 637 (1911)); Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Farquhar, 86 Md. 668, 674-75, 39 A. 527, 529 (1898).

In response, ISS has made a significant change, perhaps indicating that it was surprised by this board-deferential response from its investor clients. Previously, ISS recommended against incumbent directors if the board failed to implement a proposal that received majority shareholder support the previous year. Now, ISS will consider, on a case-bycase basis, the company's disclosed response as to why the board did not implement the proposal. While this is a welcome change, as it at least opens up the possibility that ISS will not automatically recommend against directors for not implementing a shareholder-approved proposal, we are withholding final judgment until we see how ISS applies this approach in the 2014 proxy season. In any event, in order to minimize the likelihood of an ISS withhold recommendation on directors, companies should ensure that (a) the reasoning behind a board decision not to implement a shareholder-supported proposal is fully articulated and disclosed in its proxy statement and (b) appropriate shareholder outreach is conducted and disclosed.

2. Director Tenure. Approximately half of the institutional respondents to the Survey stated that long director tenures, beginning at ten years, may diminish both the independence of a board member and the ability of the board to refresh its membership. A similar percentage stated that long tenure at key board positions (chairman, lead director or committee chair) may also be problematic. More than half of the institutional respondents recommended that ISS adopt a policy that considers director rotation with regard to these key board positions. We were glad to see ISS recognize that: "Academic studies on the topic offer conflicting conclusions." Given the challenge public companies face in finding experienced, high-quality, independent men and women who are willing to serve as directors, we hope that ISS does not further complicate the process by concluding that directors are no longer independent based on some arbitrary period of service. While the Update did not include any policy changes in this regard, ISS is continuing to solicit comments from investors until some as yet unspecified date in February, 2014 on whether it should (a) start recommending against directors on nominating committees if average board tenure or the specific tenure of one or more directors is too long or (b) cease considering board members independent after a certain tenure. (ISS is also soliciting comments on director independence and independent chair shareholder proposals.)

3. Company Performance. The Survey asked whether, and in what circumstances, ISS should consider company performance when making voting recommendations for director elections. Fully 90% of institutional respondents replied that ISS should consider company performance, either all of the time or at least when "a company has exhibited problematic governance practices that the board does not appear to be addressing." We are wary of the possibility that ISS will include company performance in its voting recommendations because ISS currently looks only at relative performance – i.e., a company's performance compared to a group selected by ISS based on the Global Industry Classification Standard. Of course, when considering only relative performance compared to some group, half of all companies will always be "underperforming." This could set the stage for increased director withhold recommendations, which in turn could result in more "failed elections" at companies with majority voting, requiring incumbent directors (possibly all directors at companies with annually elected boards) who do not receive the support of a majority of votes cast to offer their resignations. The default voting standard for director elections in Maryland is plurality and, in light of the potentially increasing influence of ISS in director elections, we continue to recommend that Maryland corporations not depart from this standard. We are glad that ISS did not implement any changes in this area in the Update.

4. Equity Compensation Plans. ISS currently evaluates equity compensation plans through a highly formulaic method. If a plan has any one of several "problematic features," ISS will automatically recommend against its approval, regardless of any other positive characteristics or the overall quality of the plan. The Survey asked which characteristics institutional investors would consider most important if ISS were to move to a more "holistic" review of these plans. Respondents most frequently cited performance conditions on equity awards and share dilution. We believe a more holistic review of equity compensation plans is preferable, as it permits an evaluation of the overall quality of the plan. Just as determining executive compensation in its entirety often requires a multifaceted evaluation and holistic review, so does a review of the quality of equity compensation plans. While the Update did not include any policy changes in this regard, ISS is continuing to solicit comments from investors until some as yet unspecified date in February, 2014 on a possible switch to a broader review of equity compensation plans.

5. Proposals Related to Increasing Authorized Shares. The Survey asked several questions about the factors considered by institutional investors in evaluating proposals to increase a company's number of authorized shares. The most common responses were "the size of the requested increase" and the "ratio of current shares outstanding compared to the new authorization." For many years, Maryland law has permitted a Maryland corporation or real estate investment trust to include a provision in its charter or declaration authorizing the board, without shareholder approval, to amend the charter or declaration to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of the company or the number of shares of any class or series that the company has authority to issue. We always recommend inclusion of this provision in the charters or declarations of our Maryland-organized clients and we are not aware of any abuse of this power.

6. Say-on-Pay Proposals. In a positive development, the Update revised how ISS evaluates say-on-pay proposals. As one of several analyses, ISS determines the relative degree of alignment ("RDA") between CEO compensation and total shareholder return at (a) the company and (b) an ISS-determined peer group. In the past, ISS determined RDA based on a 40%/60% weighted average of one- and three-year timeframes. Starting in 2014, ISS will only use the three-year timeframe. We applaud this change, as it represents a shift away from ISS's focus on short-term performance, for which it had been rightly criticized in the past.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions