United States: New Jersey Tax Court Holds Out-Of-State Corporate Limited Partner Has Nexus For CBT Purposes

The New Jersey Tax Court has held that an out-of-state corporate limited partner in a New Jersey limited partnership that owned and operated numerous supermarkets in the state had nexus for purposes of the New Jersey corporation business tax (CBT) because both entities were in the same line of business and interdependent with each other.1 Specifically, the Tax Court determined that the limited partner had nexus because both entities were parties to the same New Jersey-governed cash management agreement (CMA); had common agents, managers, officers and directors based in New Jersey upon whom they depended to operate their stores; and shared a principal place of business in New Jersey.


Village Super Market, Inc. ("INC") was a New Jersey corporation that owned and operated 25 supermarkets in New Jersey and one supermarket in Pennsylvania. In 1999, INC reorganized its business into separate legal entities to conduct its New Jersey and Pennsylvania operations. INC formed the taxpayer, Village Super Market of PA, Inc. ("PA"), as a wholly-owned subsidiary to own and operate the supermarket in Pennsylvania. PA filed a New Jersey business registration form indicating that it was doing business in the state. INC also formed a New Jersey limited partnership, Village Super Market of NJ, LP ("LP"), to operate the 25 supermarkets in New Jersey. PA held a 99 percent limited partnership interest in LP and INC held a one percent general partnership interest.2 PA's limited partnership interest in LP was its most substantial asset and largest source of income. As LP's general partner, INC appointed LP's officers. PA and LP each had a board of directors comprised of INC employees, officers and shareholders. Also, they both had the same primary place of business in New Jersey.

As part of the reorganization, both PA and LP entered into separate administrative service agreements3 and adopted a CMA4 with INC. The Tax Court noted that the day-to-day operations of the stores did not change since the 1999 reorganization and all stores continued to operate under the same name. Also, the leadership of INC, PA and LP was interrelated. The division of the stores into districts was structured in the same manner as before the reorganization. PA's store was located in the same district as some of LP's New Jersey stores. Furthermore, INC was a shareholder of a large food cooperative, Wakefern, which owned the ShopRite name used by the supermarkets and provided many services and most of the merchandise to the stores. Because only Wakefern shareholders could operate a store under the ShopRite name and INC was the only entity with shareholder status, INC was the conduit between PA and LP and the Wakefern cooperative.

The New Jersey Division of Taxation audited LP for the period of January 1, 2003 through March 31, 2006. After examining whether the distributive share of partnership income was properly reported on INC and PA's returns, the Division concluded that PA should have filed a New Jersey CBT return on the basis that PA had nexus with New Jersey. In doing so, the Division issued a formal notice that PA owed CBT for the period commencing November 1, 1999. Following PA's protest, the Division's Conference and Appeals Branch issued a final determination upholding the determination that PA was subject to the CBT. PA subsequently filed a complaint in Tax Court.

Taxpayer Had Nexus with New Jersey

The Tax Court agreed with the Division that PA had nexus with New Jersey for purposes of the CBT. The power of a state to tax an out-of-state entity is found in the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. There must a "minimal connection" or "nexus" between the interstate activities and the taxing states and "a rational relationship between the income attributed to the [s]tate and the intrastate values of the enterprise."5 Nexus can be established through a transaction-based analysis or a presence-based analysis. In a transaction-based analysis, there must be a connection between the entity and the activity being conducted in the taxing state. Therefore, a passive investor in an unrelated business enterprise would not have transactional nexus.6 For presence-based nexus, the corporation must have minimum contacts with the taxing state.7

In addition to satisfying the Due Process test, a tax on interstate activity also must satisfy the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution and meet the following requirements: (i) be applied to an activity with a substantial nexus with the taxing state; (ii) be fairly apportioned; (iii) not discriminate against interstate commerce; and (iv) be fairly related to the services provided by the state.8

The New Jersey CBT is imposed on corporations "for the privilege of having or exercising its corporate franchise in [New Jersey], or for the privilege of doing business, employing or owning capital or property, or maintaining an office, in [New Jersey]."9 An analysis of the specific facts of a case must be performed to determine whether an out-of-state corporation is subject to the CBT.10 New Jersey regulations provide guidance on the imposition of the CBT on out-of-state limited partners with investments in New Jersey.11 The Tax Court explained that the Director's nexus determinations are presumptively correct and PA had the burden of overcoming this presumption. PA argued that its limited partnership interest in LP was not enough to subject PA to the CBT because it was strictly a passive investor. In support of its argument, PA asserted that it was similar to the taxpayer in a recent case, BIS LP, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation,12 in which the Tax Court determined a limited partnership interest in a limited partnership was insufficient to create nexus with New Jersey. However, the Tax Court found that BIS, which was subsequently affirmed by the Appellate Division, did not support PA's argument because the corporate taxpayer serving as limited partner in BIS was not in the same line of business as the limited partnership. Also, the lines that divided the corporate taxpayer and the limited partnership in BIS were clean and precise. In BIS, there was no substantial overlapping of officers or the sharing of offices, operational facilities, technology or knowhow. In the instant case, the Tax Court found that PA's interactions with LP and INC established sufficient minimum contacts to meet the requirement of presence-based nexus with New Jersey. PA's interstate activities could be summarized in the following three areas: (i) physical presence in New Jersey;13 (ii) contractual presence through the CMA;14 and (iii) "correlating business interests."15 Also, the argument that PA was a separate, distinct and independent business from LP or INC was not supported by the facts. The Tax Court could not find any difference in the operations of the supermarkets before or after the 1999 reorganization. All of the entities were involved in the supermarket business and their activities were interrelated and interdependent.

According to the Tax Court, there was a rational relationship between the income attributed to New Jersey and values of the enterprise. The investment income from PA's limited partnership in LP had a rational relationship to New Jersey because of the overlap of officers and directors, the "commonality of the business enterprises"16 and their unification in INC's western district, and the execution of a joint CMA with LP and INC. The Tax Court concluded that PA was completely distinguishable from the corporate taxpayer in BIS. Rather than being separate and distinct, the lines between PA, INC and LP were blurred as all three entities were in the same line of business, interdependent upon one another, and were being operated in exactly the same manner that they were prior to the restructuring. Also, PA's identity and existence as a ShopRite operator in Pennsylvania and an investor in LP's ShopRite stores in New Jersey were dependent upon its relationship with Wakefern through shares of stock held by INC in New Jersey. Without this connection to New Jersey, PA's business model would cease to exist.17


The determination of whether an out-of-state entity that holds a limited partnership interest in a New Jersey limited partnership has nexus with the state is extremely dependent on the facts of each case. The Tax Court found in the BIS case that a limited partnership interest was not sufficient to create nexus with New Jersey. However, the Tax Court distinguished BIS from the instant case because the entities in BIS were separate and engaged in different lines of business. In contrast, the Tax Court viewed the activities of PA, LP and INC as interrelated and comprising the operation of a single supermarket business. The Tax Court repeatedly noted that the business operations did not change following the corporate reorganization.

Therefore, in situations where an out-of-state corporation owns a passive ownership interest in a New Jersey pass-through entity, the relationship between the corporation, the pass-through entity, and other related entities needs to be carefully examined when making a nexus determination. If this decision stands, taxpayers will have two relatively distinct fact patterns to consider in determining how to treat these types of arrangements, both for purposes of applying for potential CBT refunds and for prospective planning through restructuring. While it may seem that a fact pattern closer in line to BIS than this decision would be helpful in pursuing a claim for refund, this decision may further embolden the Division to challenge all refund claims of this type. Even before this latest decision the Division had indicated that it would vigorously examine the interactions and interrelationships of taxpayers claiming refunds pursuant to BIS. As for prospective planning in this area, some level of risk remains in restructuring efforts, as the Division could challenge such planning either on a transaction-by-transaction basis (for example, by claiming a transaction does not have valid business purpose) or more holistically (through regulations or support of an amended statute that would diminish or eliminate any longterm New Jersey CBT benefit of such planning).


1 Village Super Market of PA, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Tax Court, No. 021002- 2010, Oct. 23, 2013.

2 PA's limited partnership interest in LP gradually decreased to 94 percent in December 2001 and 83 percent in December 2007. INC's general partnership interest correspondingly increased.

3 Under these agreements, INC provided a variety of services such as accounting, payroll, tax return preparation and processing, and human resources.

4 As a result of entering into the CMA, all of PA and LP's cash was held by INC through a subsidiary loan for the stated purpose of efficiency and investment.

5 Exxon Corp. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue, 447 U.S. 207 (1980) (citing Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes, 445 U.S. 425 (1980)).

6 See Allied-Signal Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 504 U.S. 768 (1992).

7 A court must examine factors such as whether the corporation has offices, employees, or real or tangible personal property in the state. See Lanco, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 879 A.2d 1234 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2005), aff'd, 908 A.2d 176 (N.J. 2006), cert. denied, 551 U.S. 1131 (2007).

8 Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274 (1977).

9 Stryker Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 773 A.2d 674 (N.J. 2001) (citing Statement to Assembly Bill No. 395 of 1945 (Ch. 162, Laws 1945) (quoting N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10A-2)).

10 N.J. ADMIN. CODE tit. 18, § 7-1.9(b).

11 N.J. ADMIN. CODE tit. 18, §§ 7-1.6(a); 7-1.9(a), (b); 7-7.6(c).

12 25 N.J. Tax 88 (Tax Ct. 2009), aff'd, 26 N.J. Tax 489 (App. Div. 2011), certif. granted, 27 N.J. Tax 58 (Tax Ct. 2012). For a discussion of the BIS case, see GT SALT Alert: New Jersey Tax Court Holds Out-of-State Corporate Limited Partner That Lacked Nexus Is Entitled to CBT Refund.

13 PA's official documents and business records were kept at INC's business offices in New Jersey. Also, PA's tax returns and bank statements used the New Jersey address. PA's New Jersey business registration form indicated that there were people working in New Jersey on PA's behalf. Finally, other than the store manager, all of PA's officers and directors worked out of the New Jersey office and only made occasional visits to the Pennsylvania store.

14 The CMA was governed by New Jersey law and was executed by and between PA, LP and INC. Under the CMA, all of PA's cash assets were held in New Jersey as a subsidiary loan to INC. The substantial interest income from these loans remained in New Jersey because it was added to the principal balance of the loan and not paid out to PA.

15 Presumably, the Tax Court was referring to the fact that PA, LP and INC were operating a common supermarket business using the ShopRite name. The Court highlighted that there was a sharing of the resources and information of all three entities. Also, there was a substantial overlap of the officers and directors of PA, LP and INC.

16 This phrase apparently refers to the fact that the three entities operated a common supermarket business under the ShopRite name.

17 Interestingly, the Tax Court did not analyze whether PA, INC and LP constituted a "unitary business," stating that such determination, while referenced in BIS, was "irrelevant to this court's determination of nexus."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.