United States: An Accused Device That Infringes Sometimes, But Not Always, Nonetheless Infringes

This article was written by Joseph M.Schaffner*

In Broadcom Corp. v. Emulex Corp., No. 12-1309 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 7, 2013), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's findings of infringement, nonobviousness, and granting of a permanent injunction with accompanying sunset provision.

Broadcom Corporation ("Broadcom") owns U.S. Patent No. 7,058,150 ("the '150 patent"), generally relating to systems and methods of signal sampling.  The '150 patent discloses a signal receiver equipped with a phase interpolator to perform clock and data recovery.  Crucially, the '150 patent claims using multiple phase interpolators, each operating at a fraction of the rate of an incoming signal, to facilitate high-speed sampling.

In 2009, Broadcom brought suit against Emulex Corporation ("Emulex") alleging infringement of the '150 patent.  Broadcom averred that Emulex sold a device employing multiple data paths, reducing the frequency offset of the incoming signal "at least some of the time."  Slip op. at 7 (citation omitted).  At the close of evidence, both parties moved for JMOL on the issue of infringement.  The district court granted Broadcom's motion, ruling that Emulex infringed the '150 patent as a matter of law.  The district court rejected Emulex's claim that the accused device infringed the '150 patent "only some of the time," instead reasoning that "part-time infringement . . . is sufficient to establish infringement."  Id. (citations omitted).

After trial, both parties moved for JMOL on the issue of obviousness.  Emulex argued that the '150 patent was obvious in light of European Patent No. EP0909035 ("Pickering"), which teaches clock recovery but not data recovery.  The district court again ruled in favor of Broadcom, finding Emulex's prior art failed to teach both clock recovery and data recovery.  Lastly, the district court entered an injunction against Emulex prohibiting the sale of infringing devices.  Using the analytical framework of eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange LLC, 547 U.S. 388, 391 (2006), the district court reasoned that an eighteen-month sunset period satisfied the interests of both parties and protected Emulex's customers from supply disruptions.  Emulex appealed the district court's finding of infringement and nonobviousness.

"It is well settled that an accused device that 'sometimes, but not always, embodies a claim[] nonetheless infringes.'"  Slip op. at 12 (alteration in original) (quoting Bell Commc'n Research, Inc. v. Vitalink Commc'n Corp., 55 F.3d 615, 622-23 (Fed. Cir. 1995)).

On appeal, the Federal Circuit upheld each of the district court's rulings.  On the issue of infringement, the Court rejected Emulex's contention that the '150 patent failed to claim the use of multiple data paths in its receiver.  Turning to the specification, the Court observed that the '150 patent specifically teaches an embodiment with four data paths, each sampling at a quarter of the incoming signal rate.  The Court held, "[A]n interpretation [of a claim] which 'excludes a [disclosed] embodiment from the scope of the claim is rarely, if ever, correct.'"  Slip op. at 11 (second alteration in original) (quoting Accent Packaging, Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc., 707 F.3d 1318, 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2013)).

Emulex attempted to overcome this ruling by arguing that the accused device reduced the frequency offset only some of the time, and not all of the time.  The Federal Circuit dismissed this argument, noting that "[i]t is well settled that an accused device that 'sometimes, but not always, embodies a claim[] nonetheless infringes.'"  Id. at 12 (alteration in original) (quoting Bell Commc'n Research, Inc. v. Vitalink Commc'n Corp., 55 F.3d 615, 622-23 (Fed. Cir. 1995)).  Finding the '150 patent claimed multiple data paths and the accused device sometimes practiced such an embodiment, the Court affirmed the district court's granting of JMOL in favor of Broadcom.

The Court next turned to the issue of obviousness, holding that the '150 patent would not have been obvious to one skilled in the art in light of Pickering.  The Court clarified that "prior art references that address different problems may not, depending on the art and circumstances, support an inference that the skilled artisan would consult both of them simultaneously."  Id. at 14.  To the Court, Pickering addressed a different problem than the '150 patent.  Pickering contemplated only clock recovery, not both clock and data recovery together.

The Court further concluded that, even if there might have been some motivation to add data recovery to Pickering, trial evidence suggested such a combination would not have worked for its intended purpose.  It is not enough to show "all of the elements that comprise the invention were known in the prior art," the Court explained, but rather, a finding of obviousness "requires a 'plausible rational [sic] as to why the prior art references would have worked together.'"  Id. at 15 (alteration in original) (quoting Power-One, Inc. v. Artesyn Techs., Inc., 599 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2010)).  Finally, the Court found substantial evidence indicating objective indicia of nonobviousness, including commercial success of the products embodying the '150 patent, as well as a nexus between the claimed technology and the success of the products.  The Court accordingly affirmed the district court's denial of Emulex's JMOL calling for the invalidity of the '150 patent on obviousness grounds.

The Court lastly reviewed the district court's granting of a permanent injunction with eighteen-month sunset period.  The Court began its analysis by highlighting features of "design win" markets for original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs"), in which Broadcom and Emulex are directly competing suppliers for the OEMs.  Suppliers prevailing in such "design win" systems enjoy two additional benefits apart from sales:  temporary immunization from competition, and an increased likelihood of winning subsequent design competitions due to the OEM's familiarity with the winning supplier.  Based on these market characteristics, the Court found Broadcom's loss of market share to Emulex irreparable and stemming directly from the adjudicated infringement.

Emulex argued that there was no evidence that the features claimed in the '150 patent were in demand, and that the patent feature is only a small component of the infringing product, relying on Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., 678 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2012), where it was held that the patented feature was not a determinative factor in sales, and therefore there was no nexus between infringement and the alleged harm.  The Court rejected this argument, indicating that the evidence showed that the infringement did cause harm.  As the Court observed, "Broadcom has shown—not that it is likely to succeed on the merits and likely to suffer irreparable harm—but that it in fact has succeeded on the merits and has suffered irreparable harm."  Slip op. at 20.  The Court similarly approved of the district court's sunset period for Emulex's continued sales of the infringing products.  Consistent with these holdings, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's permanent injunction decree and sunset provisions.

Accordingly, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings on infringement, nonobviousness, and granting of a permanent injunction with eighteen-month sunset period.

Judges: Rader (author), Lourie, Wallach

[Appealed from C.D. Cal., Judge Selna]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, November 2013.

* Joseph M. Schaffner is a Law Clerk at Finnegan.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
14 Nov 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan’s 2018 webinar series addresses challenges across the IP landscape in the United States. The series starts with one of the fundamentals—proving or disproving obviousness. The panelists will address what works and what doesn’t before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiners, before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and before the courts.

14 Nov 2018, Workshop, London, UK

Finnegan partner Leythem Wall will consider European claim drafting strategy and lead the Chemical Workshop during a two-day course, hosted by Management Forum.

14 Nov 2018, Speaking Engagement, Washington, DC, United States
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Banner & Witcoff
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Banner & Witcoff
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions