United States: Inequitable Conduct Post-Therasense: Two Important Recent Rulings

Inequitable conduct is a highly potent defense to patent infringement in the United States.  As the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has pointed out, the defense has the effect of an "atomic bomb" and can "endanger a substantial portion of a company's patent portfolio."  Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., 649 F.3d 1276, 1288-89 (Fed. Cir. 2011).  Unlike invalidity defenses, which pertain to particular claims of a patent, a finding of inequitable conduct renders the entire patent invalid and unenforceable, and may knock out continuations and divisionals of that patent as well.  A finding of inequitable conduct in a patent protecting an important commercial product can also lead to antitrust and unfair-competition claims against the patent holder in subsequent suits, which are not only costly to litigate but can expose the patent holder to punitive damages.  See id. at 1289.  A significant risk of unenforceability can also severely diminish the value of a patent portfolio intended for licensing or sale.

To prove inequitable conduct, the defendant must show that the patent applicant: (1) withheld or misrepresented so-called "material" information, and (2) did so with intent to deceive the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).  See id. at 1287.  Due to concern over the harsh effects of inequitable conduct on the patent holder, the Federal Circuit in Therasense tightened the standards required for finding inequitable conduct.  See id. at 1288-89.  Specifically, the Federal Circuit held that "the materiality required to establish inequitable conduct is but-for materiality," meaning that if the USPTO had been aware of the withheld or misrepresented information, it would not have issued the patent.  Id. at 1291.  As to intent, the court found that the challenger "must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the applicant knew of the [material information], knew that it was material, and made a deliberate decision to withhold it."  Id. at 1290.  The court elaborated that "the specific intent to deceive must be 'the single most reasonable inference able to be drawn from the evidence.'"  Id.  (quoting Star Scientific Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 537 F.3d 1357, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2008)).  Thus, "when there are multiple reasonable inferences that may be drawn, intent to deceive cannot be found."  Id. at 1290-91.  However, where there is proof of "affirmative egregious misconduct" such as a "'deliberately planned and carefully executed scheme[ ]' to defraud the [USPTO]," it is not necessary to prove that the information at issue was "but-for" material.  Id. at 1292 (quoting Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 245 (1944)). 

In spite of the heightened requirements for finding inequitable conduct, two recent cases illustrate the types of behaviors that can render a patent unenforceable and provide guidance to applicants on how to correct errors during prosecution to avoid accusations of inequitable conduct.  The case of Worldwide Home Products, Inc. v. Time Inc., No. 11 Civ. 3633, slip op. (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2013), involved a patent claiming a set of clothes hangers that stack together in a particular, nested pattern.  The examiner had rejected the claims over a reference describing a prior clothes hanger set with an apparently similar design.  Id. at 2-3.  To distinguish the claimed hangers from the prior art hangers, the applicant's attorney amended the claims to add a further structural limitation and also held a telephone interview with the examiner about the rejection.  Id. at 3-4.  According to the court, the reference the examiner had cited did not provide very clear photographs or drawings of the prior art hangers, and so the examiner allowed the amended claims over that prior art.  See id. at 13-17.  The attorney prosecuting the application, however, at the time he made the claim amendments and discussed the application with the examiner, had physical samples of the prior art hangers in his possession.  Id. at 4.  In addition, a third party had sent the attorney high-resolution photographs of the prior art hangers before the patent issued.  Id. at 5-6.  The samples and photographs allegedly demonstrated that the claim amendments did not distinguish the claimed hangers from the prior art hangers.  Id.  The attorney, however, did not provide any information about the samples or photographs to the USPTO.  Id. at 6-8. 

The district court held that there was no question that the nondisclosed information about the hangers was "but-for" material to the patent application, as it was the basis for a claim rejection and also inferred from the surrounding circumstantial evidence that the nondisclosure was intentional.  Id. at 13, 15-18.  In particular, there was evidence of a "sense of urgency" for the applicant in obtaining this patent, as the applicant intended to immediately enforce it against the defendants in the lawsuit.  Id. at 5.  The prosecuting attorney testified that he was not aware that either the hangers or the high-resolution photographs of the hangers were prior art and thus material, and that this was why he did not submit the information.  Id. at 8.  Despite this testimony, the court found that the attorney had engaged in a "pattern of disingenuous behavior" and held the patent unenforceable.  Id. at 16-18. 

In Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. HTC Corp., No. 2012-1658, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2013), the Federal Circuit found a pattern of deceptive behavior in the submission of false declarations during prosecution and a failure to clearly correct the false statements.  The court also pointed out that submitting a false declaration "is exactly the sort of 'affirmative act[ ] of egregious misconduct' that renders the misconduct 'material.'"  Id. at 7 (alteration in original) (quoting Therasense, 649 F.3d at 1292). 

In Intellect Wireless, the inventor submitted a declaration to overcome a claim rejection that falsely stated that his invention had been "actually reduced to practice" (e.g., through building a prototype) and that the invention was demonstrated at a meeting on a particular date.  Id. at 3-5.  In fact, the invention had only been "constructively reduced to practice" (i.e., through the filing of a patent application).  Id.  While the applicant submitted a revised declaration stating that the applicant was relying on constructive rather than actual reduction to practice, the Federal Circuit found the revised declaration insufficient to cure the earlier false statements, in part because the revised declaration did not point out that the earlier statements were untrue.  Id. at 4-6.  Specifically, the court found that "the declaration nowhere expressly stated the actual facts" and that it did not "openly advise the USPTO of [the inventor's] misrepresentations."  Id. at 6.  The patent holder argued that, in any case, there was no specific intent to deceive the USPTO given the inventor's attempts to correct the record during prosecution.  Id. at 9.  But the court disagreed.  Instead, it found that the inventor and applicant engaged in a "pattern of deceit, which makes [an] inference [of intent to deceive] stronger."  Id. at 10.  Coming back to the revised declaration, the court further noted that it "dances around the truth" by referring to a "prototype" that had never been built and to a "product brochure" and "commercialization," despite the lack of a product.  Id. at 10-11. 

Intellect Wireless illustrates that great care should be taken in preparing and submitting declarations and other evidence of patentability to the USPTO as a court may view errors in a declaration to be inherently material.  But the case also indicates that, if factual mistakes are found in a declaration, openly and clearly identifying those mistakes and providing the correct facts in a later submission so that the examiner can evaluate the information before allowing the application may help to avoid a finding of inequitable conduct.  See id. at 5-6.  Both of these recent cases indicate that if mistakes are made during prosecution of an application, it may be possible to correct them during prosecution so long as the correct information is clearly presented to the examiner at a time when the examiner can act on the information.  It may also be possible after the 2011 America Invents Act to attempt to cure inequitable conduct once a patent has issued, either through the newly introduced "supplemental examination" procedure or through the filing of a reissue application.  But those postissuance procedures are costly, can be quite slow, and can create additional enforceability risks.  Thus, if mistakes are found during prosecution of a patent application, it may be best to attempt to correct them before a patent issues.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
22 Jan 2019, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

As part of Strafford Publications’ webinar series, Finnegan partners Shana Cyr and Mark Feldstein will provide essential updates on FDA practice and patent law relating to biologics and biosimilars.

27 Jan 2019, Other, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan is a sponsor of the Association of Corporate Patent Counsel Winter Meeting. Finnegan partner Erika Arner will join the panel discussion “PTAB Review & Litigation.”

27 Jan 2019, Other, Florida, United States

Finnegan is a sponsor of the Association of Corporate Patent Counsel Winter Meeting. Finnegan partner Erika Arner will join the panel discussion “PTAB Review & Litigation.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions