United States: NAD Case Reports In Federal Court: What Evidentiary Value Does A Self-Regulatory Decision Hold?

Last Updated: November 14 2013
Article by David Conway, Roger Colaizzi and Amy R. Mudge

This week we are planning to post a series of blogs looking at NAD procedural issues.  For advertisers, how NAD works can sometimes be as important as what NAD decides.  This first posting, however, pertains to the intersection between the NAD and the federal courts.  The evidentiary value of an opinion by an advertising self-regulatory body like the NAD is an issue that has received relatively little attention.  Although NAD is designed to adjudicate advertising disputes quickly, efficiently, and effectively, sadly it does not always have the final word.  Sometimes a disappointed party before the NAD chooses to move the dispute to federal court under the Lanham Act.  Other times, the advertiser may find itself the subject of a consumer class action lawsuit after receiving an unfavorable NAD recommendation.  In either circumstance, your client may wonder: What evidentiary impact will the NAD's case report have if my advertising is challenged in federal court?  The answer is probably very little, although the impact may vary depending on the posture of the litigation and the reason for which the case report is offered as evidence.

For many lawyers, the hearsay rule remains seared into law school memory: Hearsay is an out-of-court statement that "a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement."  Even if relevant, hearsay is inadmissible as evidence unless offered for a non-hearsay purpose or under one of the numerous hearsay exceptions provided for by the rules.  In federal court, an NAD decision might be used for three reasons – one is typically inadmissible hearsay; the second is usually admissible non-hearsay; and the third is not evidentiary at all.

Reason #1: An advertiser might seek to bolster its scientific substantiation by offering the NAD's findings as evidence that its scientific testing was reliably conducted and adequate to support its advertising claims.  Or a challenger might seek to use an unfavorable NAD case report as evidence that the advertiser's substantiation is inadequate. 

Generally, an NAD decision will constitute inadmissible hearsay when offered to prove the truth of its contents, including with respect to the NAD's findings on consumer perception, the reliability of scientific testing, or the substantiation of advertising claims.  For example, the Eastern District of New York rejected one plaintiff's attempt, on summary judgment, to rely on the NAD and NARB's consumer perception findings as the sole extrinsic evidence of implied falsity.  As the court explained, "[t]hese findings, like judicial findings, are generally characterized as inadmissible hearsay that cannot be used to prove the truth of the matter asserted."  The court also noted that the plaintiff was unable "to point to any case in the United States, where NAD and NARB findings have been found to constitute admissible extrinsic evidence that could support an implied falsity claim."  Similarly, the Eastern District of California took judicial notice of the existence of an NAD referral to the FTC after one litigant refused to participate, but the Court refused to "attribute any weight to [its] contents so long as [it is] disputed by either party."  The District of New Jersey and the Southern District of New York have issued similar evidentiary rulings.

However, in the preliminary injunction context, where evidentiary requirements are typically relaxed, the district courts have sometimes permitted litigants to rely on NAD decisions for the truth of their contents, but only when offered as support for other extrinsic evidence.  For instance, the Northern District of Georgia allowed a plaintiff to support its consumer perception study with the NAD's consumer perception finding.  The Southern District of Indiana even allowed a litigant to support its extrinsic evidence with an unrelated NAD decision interpreting similar advertising.But the District of Minnesota has rejected a plaintiff's effort "to bolster" its survey evidence with the NAD and NARB's consumer perception findings even in the preliminary injunction context. 

Reason #2: An advertiser or challenger might want to rely on an NAD decision to show the advertiser's good faith belief that the advertising claims were adequately substantiated or bad faith intent to mislead consumers – a factor which could be relevant to the scope of enhanced damages or attorneys' fees awards in a private proceeding. 

The federal courts have recognized that, in cases where a person's state of mind is an issue, a statement offered to show its effect on the state of mind of that person is not hearsay.  In this regard, several federal courts have allowed parties to rely on NAD decisions for purposes of establishing equitable defenses or showing states of mind.  For example, in the case referenced above, the Eastern District of New York, after refusing to allow the plaintiff to offer the NAD and NARB decisions as extrinsic evidence of consumer perception, did allow it to offer the decisions as evidence of the defendant's state of mind.  On that basis, the plaintiff argued (unsuccessfully) that the defendant's refusal to modify its advertising after receiving an unfavorable NAD decision demonstrated its bad faith intent to deceive the public.

It is important to note, however, that even when an NAD decision is offered for a non-hearsay purpose, the Rules of Evidence still allow a district court to exclude the decision if it determines that the risk of jury confusion outweighs the potential benefit of admitting the evidence.  For example, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (242 F.R.D. 303) granted the plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude evidence of a separate NAD proceeding brought by the plaintiff against a third party engaged in similar advertising.  In support of its laches defense, the defendant sought to introduce the NAD decision and related filings to show that the plaintiff had quickly challenged other competitors engaged in similar advertising, yet unreasonably delayed in bringing its lawsuit against the defendant.  Id. at 311.  The district court determined that evidence of the plaintiff's unrelated NAD challenge was largely irrelevant and "could confuse the jury with evidence of a wholly unrelated action, concerning an unrelated product made by a manufacturer with no connection to this lawsuit."

Reason #3: An advertiser or challenger might also cite to an NAD decision as persuasive legal authority for what is required to substantiate advertising claims under the FTC Act.

Federal courts have recognized the NAD's expertise in the field of advertising and claim substantiation, and on occasion they have cited NAD decisions involving unrelated litigants as persuasive interpretations of advertising law.  As one court has explained,

In the fourteen years since its formation, the NAD has developed its own process of reviewing complaints of deceptiveness, coupling relative informality and confidentiality with safeguards to ensure procedural fairness. . . . To these advantages . . . is added the unique ability of the NAD to decide what is fair in advertising. A judge might make this inquiry, but ultimately it would have to defer to the very expertise that NAD offers without resort to the courts.

One thing to keep in mind if citing an NAD case report for legal precedent: NAD applies section 5(a) of the FTC Act when adjudicating advertising disputes.  Although FTC law is largely consistent with private advertising law under the Lanham Act and state consumer protection acts, there are varying burdens and differing substantiation requirements that render the laws not entirely overlapping.  Always make sure that the legal principal for which you are citing an NAD case report also applies under the law governing your case.

In summary, although NAD participants should always be wary of the record they build and what future effect an NAD case report may have on their interests, from an evidentiary standpoint it is unlikely that the NAD's recommendation – favorable or otherwise – will make or break a subsequent federal lawsuit.  An NAD case report constitutes inadmissible hearsay when offered to prove consumer perception, adequacy of substantiation, or any other factual conclusion reached by NAD.  Although an advertiser's failure to comply with an NAD recommendation may open the door for a challenger to offer it as evidence of bad faith or intent to deceive, that advertiser will likely face much bigger concerns in the form of an NAD referral to an "appropriate federal or state law enforcement agency."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions