Today in Hobart (Tasmania), at its annual meeting, the
Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living
Resources (CCAMLR) failed in its third attempt to adopt proposals
that would have established the world's largest marine
protected area (MPA) in Antarctica's Southern Ocean. On
the agenda were two proposals: One sponsored by
the U.S. and New Zealand to establish a 1.32 million km no-take
zone in the Ross Sea; the other was a proposal from Australia,
France and the EU for a 1.6 million km East Antarctic MPA
The proposals were the subject of an historic special meeting of CCAMLR in July held
in Germany after CCAMLR failed to reach unanimity of its members at
the 2012 annual meeting.
CCAMLR is comprised of 24 nations and the EU.
Unanimity is required to adopt any proposal concerning
preserves. Only Russia and the Ukraine actively blocked
negotiations in favor of the proposals, while China withdrew its
support for the East Antarctic MPA.
The controversy pits environmentalists, scientists
and researchers against the commercial toothfish (a/k/a
"Chilean Sea Bass") industry. In addition to
conservation efforts to protect the over 10,000 unique species that
make their home in the Southern Ocean, scientists cite the region as crucial to
studying how intact marine ecosystems function and to determine the
impacts of global climate change.
The proposals were supported by the Antarctic Ocean Alliance, the
Pew Charitable Trust, the Southern Ocean Coalition and became the
focus of several social media efforts.
The failure of the proposals leaves some questioning CCAMLR's ability to fulfill
its raison d'etre of conserving the
Antarctic marine ecosystems.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
On April 11, 2017, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, in Waterkeeper Alliance, et al., v. EPA, vacated a 2008 EPA rule that exempted farms from certain hazardous substance reporting requirements (the "2008 Rule").
Although the climate change rhetoric coming out of Washington, D.C. may have some believing that regulatory scrutiny of "green" claims will soften, a closer look at the current political and social climate at the state level and in the private sector reveals that both the demand for green products and the use (and regulation) of green marketing claims actually could trend upwards this year.
On March 28, 2017, President Trump issued an "Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth" (E.O.) that takes aim at a broad range of federal climate and energy programs and regulations.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).