United States: Board Exceeded Its "Limited Role" In Reviewing Examiner’s Findings During Reexamination

In Rambus Inc. v. Rea, No. 12-1634 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 24, 2013), the Federal Circuit reviewed an invalidity decision made by the Board during reexamination proceedings.  The Court affirmed the Board's claim construction, vacated the Board's obviousness decision, and remanded for further proceedings.

U.S. Patent No. 6,260,097 ("the '097 patent") is directed to a dynamic random-access memory ("DRAM") that uses a synchronous memory system to transfer data.  In synchronous systems, a clock signal alternates between a digital value of 0 and 1.  The change in the clock signal from 0 to 1 is referred to as the "rising edge" of the clock, and the change in the signal from 1 to 0 is referred to as the "falling edge" of the clock.  In conventional synchronous memory systems, the data transmitted to the memory tie up the system for a full cycle of the clock.  The '097 patent is directed to a system that transfers a portion of the data on the rising edge and a portion of the data on the falling edge of the clock signal, transferring data at twice the rate.

The PTO initiated inter partes reexamination of the '097 patent claims and found that the reexamined claims were not patentable over two references:  Unexamined Japanese Patent Application
No. 56-88987 ("Inagaki") and the Intel iAPX system manual and specification ("iAPX").  The examiner rejected the claims as anticipated by Inagaki and/or obvious in light of the iAPX system in view of Inagaki.  The Board upheld the examiner's rejections, and Rambus appealed.

Regarding anticipation, the Federal Circuit first considered whether the Board properly construed "external clock signal" as requiring the clock to be periodic during the data input phases, as opposed to being periodic for all system operations.  Rambus contended that the intrinsic record required the "external clock signal" to be continuously periodic.  The PTO countered that the claim language required only that the external clock signal synchronize data transfer and need not be periodic for all time.  The Federal Circuit agreed with the PTO that the claimed method required that the "external clock signal" be periodic during data transfer, but that nothing in the claim language, specification, or prosecution history required the signal to be periodic for all time.

"The Board has a procedure for issuing a new ground of rejection in appeals of inter partes reexaminations.  37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b).  This procedure ensures that appellants have an appropriate opportunity to respond and, if necessary, supplement the record before the examiner.  We cannot let the Board shortcut this procedure and deprive appellants of their due process rights."  Slip op. at 12-13.

Next, considering the construction of "write request," the Court agreed with the Board that the claimed "write request" was not limited to a multiple-bit request and could contain a single bit.  Rambus argued that the specification showed that each request carried at least two bits of information.  Rambus also argued that the Board's construction did not comport with the Federal Circuit's holding in a prior case involving the same family of patents as the '097 patent, Rambus Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG, 318 F.3d 1081, 1093 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

The Court, however, found that the plain language of the claims-at-issue did not limit "write request" to a multiple-bit request, and that the specification disclosed a preferred embodiment involving a single bit.  Although the Court noted that, in rare cases, a claim construction may exclude the preferred embodiment when there is highly persuasive evidentiary support, it concluded that there was no such evidentiary support here.  Moreover, the Court did not find that the Board disregarded the Court's construction in Infineon.  The Court explained that in Infineon, the dispute centered on the accused infringer's contention that the claimed "request" must include both address and control information, and at no time did the Court resolve whether the "write request" can be a single bit.  Slip op. at 7 (citing Infineon, 318 F.3d at 1091).

Because the Federal Circuit concluded that the Board correctly construed the "external signal" and "write request" limitations, it affirmed the Board's finding that Inagaki anticipates claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, and 14 of the '097 patent.

With regard to the Board's finding of obviousness, Rambus argued that the Board committed multiple errors, and the Federal Circuit agreed.  First, the Court agreed that the Board erroneously placed the burden on Rambus to show nonobviousness.  The Court stressed that "[i]n reexamination proceedings, 'a preponderance of the evidence must show nonpatentability before the PTO may reject the claims of a patent application.'"  Id. at 10-11 (quoting Ethicon, Inc. v. Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422, 1427 (Fed. Cir. 1988)).  The Court found that the Board concluded that Rambus had not demonstrated nonobviousness, which was legal error.

The Court also found that the Board exceeded its limited role to review the examiner's decisions during prosecution.  The Court explained that the legal framework under the APA limits the Board's ability to rely on different grounds than the examiner in making rejections.  According to the Court, "[t]he ultimate criterion is whether the appellant has had before the PTO a 'fair opportunity to react to the thrust of the rejection.'"  Id. at 11-12 (quoting In re Jung, 637 F.3d 1356, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2011)).  The Court found the Board erred in supplying its own reasons for combining iAPX and Inagaki after recognizing that the examiner's finding was erroneous.  The Court decided that since the Board has a procedure for issuing a new ground of rejection in appeals of inter partes reexaminations, it could not "let the Board shortcut this procedure and deprive appellants of their due process rights."  Id. at 13.

The Court also held that the Board erred in its treatment of objective evidence of nonobviousness.  Particularly, the Court noted that the Board erroneously ignored Rambus's uncontested evidence of
long-felt need and industry praise due to the claimed dual-edge data transfer functionality and found the evidence lacked a nexus.  Further, the Court emphasized that objective evidence of nonobviousness need only be reasonably commensurate with the scope of the claims, which "do[es] not require a patentee to produce objective evidence of nonobviousness for every potential embodiment of the claim."  Id. at 14.  Accordingly, the Court decided that the Board erred in finding that Rambus's evidence relating to the high-speed memory system embodiments was not commensurate with the scope of the claims.

Additionally, the Court concluded that Rambus's licensing evidence linked its commercial success to the claimed dual-edge data transfer functionality and that the Board's finding of lack of a nexus was unsupported and erroneous.  Ultimately, the Court emphasized that "[w]hile objective evidence of nonobviousness lacks a nexus if it exclusively relates to a feature that was 'known in the prior art,' the obviousness inquiry centers on whether 'the claimed invention as a whole' should have been obvious."  Id. at 15 (citations omitted).  Despite the Board's finding that Rambus's objective evidence of nonobviousness pertained to the claimed dual-edge functionality that was disclosed in Inagaki and known in the prior art, the Court found that at least some of Rambus's evidence relates to Rambus's overall memory device architecture.  Therefore, the Court instructed the Board to carefully consider the objective evidence of nonobviousness on Rambus's patented design as a whole and make the final determination on remand.

Judges:  Moore (author), Linn, O'Malley

[Appealed from Board]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, October 2013.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
14 Nov 2018, Conference, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan is a Silver sponsor of the sixth annual World Intellectual Property Forum, hosted by Intellectual Professionals LLP. Finnegan partner Clare Cornell will present “Trademarks v. Company Names” and partner Patrick Coyne will present “Current Issues in U.S. Patent Law and Reform: The Next Wave”

16 Nov 2018, Seminar, Copenhagen, Denmark

Innovative companies, large and small, use patents to protect their key inventions. Obtaining valuable patents, however, requires skilled patent counsel and an in-depth knowledge of the legal requirements for securing claims that are strategically useful to your company.

17 Nov 2018, Conference, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan partner Clare Cornell will present “Covert Trademark Use in the Internet: Licit or Illicit” at the Asian Patent Attorneys Association Conference.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions