United States: Retirement Income Team Newsletter - October 2013

This newsletter is published by the Drinker Biddle Retirement Income Team - a group of attorneys whose combined focus is on retirement income investments and products - but whose individual specialties include employee benefits, securities law, investment management, insurance, income taxation and government relations.

The purpose of the newsletter is to inform our clients and friends about issues of interest to the investment managers and insurance companies that create retirement income vehicles, people in their organizations who deal with the compliance issues, advisers and consultants who assist in the distribution of those products and services, and retirement plan sponsors who evaluate and select them.

With the aging of the baby boomers and the ongoing retirement of the first generation of 401(k) participants, the issue of retirement income is gaining in importance. The question is: how will the average retiree invest and withdraw his or her money in a way that it lasts for a lifetime (and the lifetime of the retiree's spouse), regardless of whether that is 10, 20, 30 or more years? That is a complex and difficult task.

Because of these issues, we believe there is a need to focus on the laws and compliance issues of importance to retirement income products and services. That is the work of our Retirement Income Team. Because of our combined expertise, we are able to address those issues arising under insurance and securities laws, as well as those under ERISA that govern the use of those products and services in 401(k) and other defined contribution retirement plans. It is a unique combination that we believe offers value to our clients.

Before ending this introduction, I want to thank John Blouch for his leadership of our Team since its inception. John is an outstanding attorney and a good friend. But, at this stage of life, he has decided to become the object of our focus... that is, John has become a retiree. John, we will miss you.

Fred Reish
Chair, Retirement Income Team


By Fred Reish, Bruce L. Ashton and Joshua J. Waldbeser

In our last newsletter, we wrote about the DOL's Advance Notice of Proposed Rule Making (ANPRM) concerning the projection of retirement income on ERISA participant benefit statements. Since that article was published, a number of plan sponsor and service provider organizations have filed their comments with the DOL, and the comment period has now expired. This article contains a general summary of the comments and our view of the next steps.

The DOL will now begin its review of the comments filed by the private sector. Many of the comments were thoughtful and detailed... which will give meaningful input to the regulatory process. Different comments filed by a number of knowledgeable and credible organizations supported almost all of the alternative approaches suggested by the DOL, meaning that the comments often conflicted with each other. Also, many of the organizations noted significant disagreement on key issues even within their own membership. As a result, the DOL should find some level of support (and some level of dissent) for virtually any avenue that it decides to pursue. Examples of the alternatives discussed include whether the projections should be made mandatory or merely voluntary with a fiduciary safe harbor to encourage their use, and even whether the project should be abandoned entirely in favor of online calculators for plan participants.

Realistically though, we suspect that the DOL will, after reviewing the comments, draft a proposed regulation that mandates retirement income projections on participant benefit statements. While some employer organizations and service provider organizations argued against the mandate, organizations that represent employees, participants and retirees were nearly unanimous in arguing that mandated projections would provide value to plan participants.

Allowing for a reasonable period of time to review the comments and draft a proposed regulation, it is possible that a regulatory package could be sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in mid-first quarter 2014. It ordinarily takes the OMB three months for its review, which suggests that the proposed regulation would not be publicly available for comment until well into the second quarter. That would then be followed by a comment period and perhaps public hearings. Allowing time for that, together with the development of the final regulation and its review by the OMB, would add another seven to nine months to the process.

So, our "best guess" is that we could have a final regulation in the second quarter of 2015, but with a deferred effective date to allow time for system changes and other necessary implementation steps.

Once again, the DOL received comments from knowledgeable and credible organizations that would support almost any outcome. That said, based on our reading of the comments, we think that the following are "high possibility" outcomes:

  • The projection of retirement income on benefit statements will be mandated.
  • There will be a safe harbor... of sorts. Many of the commenters responded unfavorably to the safe harbors in the ANPRM, which consisted largely of fixed assumptions. These commenters suggested that fixed percentages are too rigid and would inhibit innovation and efforts to improve the quality of projections by adjusting assumptions over time to reflect "real life" shifts in the interest rate and capital markets. Instead, they recommended that the DOL provide retirement income projection guidelines similar to the investment education guidelines in Interpretive Bulletin 96-1. At a high level, this approach would ensure that plan sponsors could avoid having their projections deemed to be fiduciary "investment advice" (and avoid corresponding potential liability) so long as they are based on reasonable assumptions and do not steer plan participants toward specific investment products. We believe there is a significant possibility that the DOL will adopt this approach in developing the proposed regulation.
  • Most of the commenters suggested that plan sponsors should be able to select from among a variety of methods for projecting the payment of retirement income. For example, some of the commenters favor the withdrawal method, rather than the annuity method. Others prefer the annuity method, but with the calculations based on commonly accepted actuarial assumptions, rather than the specific annuity contracts offered by each particular plan. We believe that there is a significant possibility that the DOL will adopt the latter alternative.

Those are our thoughts. At best, it is a guessing game. So, we encourage readers to view this as our attempt to "handicap" the odds rather than make specific predictions.


By Diana E. McCarthy and David L. Williams

Managed payout funds are mutual funds designed to provide a steady stream of retirement income while still allowing retirees access to their money during their lifetime. Managed payout funds are of relatively recent vintage (2008). The launch of these products coincided with the economic downturn, which adversely affected their popularity and growth for a time. As the economy has rallied, however, managed payout funds are gaining more assets. Managed payout funds make periodic distributions at a specified annual or monthly rate, but because they are mutual funds and not insurance products, they cannot offer a guarantee that payments will continue for a specified period or the life of the retiree.

Managed Payout Funds vs. Annuity-Like Products

Managed payout funds are often compared to annuity products or annuity-like products such as guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (GMWBs). There are key differences, however. In particular, annuity participants generally relinquish their retirement account (and access to its value during life) in return for guaranteed payments. A GMWB is an insurance product, owned by the investor, that provides guaranteed income for a retiree's life as long as the retiree does not withdraw more than a specified percentage from the fund each year; if the retiree opts for larger withdrawals, the lifetime income guarantee is forfeited. Managed payout funds allow investors to withdraw more than the payout (or their entire investment) at any time, but this liquidity benefit is offset by the loss of the anticipated payout. While managed payout funds seek to provide steady income to investors, such payouts will generally rise and fall depending on market conditions. It is possible for a managed payout fund to suffer substantial investment losses and simultaneously experience additional asset reductions as a result of distributions to shareholders. Thus, managed payout funds are a useful investment tool when combined with more certain sources of retirement income. For example, it may be prudent for a retiree to buy an annuity or GMWB to cover fixed costs and invest in a managed payout fund for discretionary spending that can be scaled back if the fund underperforms.

Types of Managed Payout Funds

Managed payout funds generally fall into two categories: those that pay out indefinitely and those that pay out for a set term and then liquidate (i.e., reverse target date funds). A principal difference between these types of funds is that the income for the indefinite payout funds will tend to vary more than the reverse target date type funds.

Indefinite Payout Funds. Indefinite payout funds function as you would expect. They are designed to pay out monthly income for an indefinite period of time. Schwab Funds and Vanguard Funds typify this type of funds.

Schwab offers three types of monthly payout funds: moderate payout, enhanced payout and maximum payout. Each fund type has the same investment objective: to seek to provide current income and, as a secondary investment objective, capital appreciation. Each fund is also a fund of funds, meaning that its principal investment strategy is to invest in other Schwab funds, which are a mixture of equity, fixed income and money market funds. The main difference among the three funds is the target asset allocation used to achieve the investment objective suggested by the name of each fund. The funds' principal risks are linked to those of the underlying funds and the adviser's ability to manage the fund to produce the monthly payout goal. The Schwab maximum payout fund aims to provide monthly income in the ranges of 1-5% in a low interest environment and 5-8% in a high interest rate environment. The other two funds aim for progressively lower percentages.

Vanguard also offers three different managed payout funds. Their investment objectives are to make monthly distributions of cash while seeking to provide inflation protection and capital appreciation. Vanguard's managed payout funds operate similarly to that of the three Schwab funds in that they have different asset allocation strategies geared to their distribution goals. They, too, are funds of funds, and their principal risks are similar to that of the Schwab managed payout funds. The monthly distribution goals range from 3-7% depending on the fund.

Reverse Target Date Funds. Fidelity's and PIMCO's fund offerings are examples of reverse target date funds. Essentially, these funds aim to pay out all of their principal and earnings by a date certain, thus the monthly income paid to investors is a combination of both principal and earnings. Fidelity has at least 14 of these funds with target liquidation dates ranging from 2016 to 2042. The allocations become more conservative over time. The Fidelity funds invest in all types of affiliated funds, in contrast to PIMCO's two managed income funds that liquidate in 2019 and 2029, respectively, and seek to invest at least 90% of their assets in "laddered" inflation-indexed Treasury bonds. PIMCO's investment objectives are to provide "consistent real (inflation-adjusted) distributions" through the maturity of the fund. The Fidelity managed payout funds' investment objectives seek total return through a combination of current income and capital growth, but their returns are not inflation adjusted like the PIMCO funds. Each of these reverse target date funds aims to make distributions that gradually increase over time to the date of maturity of the fund.

A main difference between the reverse target date funds and traditional target date funds is that the former seeks to provide monthly income for the investor through retirement, whereas traditional target date funds are designed to provide the investor with assets by the time of retirement.


Managed payout funds are relatively new and are only starting to gain traction in the market as investors and their advisers become more knowledgeable about how to use them. Generally, they are not necessarily intended to be an investor's sole source of income because their monthly income is not guaranteed. They are probably most useful for investors who have other sources of steady income, whether they be annuities, GMWBs, pensions or other sources.


By Joan M. Neri and Mark F. Costley

The Variable annuity contract ("Contract") sales practices were again included in the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's ("FINRA") 2013 Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter as among the "key investor protection and market integrity issues" that it will focus on in the coming year. This article discusses two potential risk areas that broker-dealers should consider in connection with the Contracts that their registered representatives ("Advisors") sell, and steps that they can consider to mitigate these potential risks.

Contracts often contain provisions permitting the annuity provider to implement future changes or require action by the policyholder (the "Client") as a condition to receiving the guaranteed payment. Broker-dealers whose Advisors recommend Contracts to Clients that include these provisions should consider whether those Contracts should be monitored on an on-going basis to ensure continued suitability, and to determine whether future Client communications would be prudent.

Broker-dealers whose Advisors recommend Contracts have an obligation under FINRA rules to ensure that recommended products are "suitable" in light of the Client's financial needs, investment objectives, and other relevant information. As a general matter, to carry out this obligation, the broker-dealer and/or Advisor will evaluate the Contract's terms, asset allocation and investment line-up and determine whether those characteristics align with the Client's financial needs, objectives and circumstances. What if - after undertaking this analysis and recommending a Contract that is suitable for the Client - the Contract's terms, asset allocation and/or investment line-up is significantly modified?

Recently, annuity providers have exercised their contractual right to make changes to existing Contract terms, including investment line-up changes, shifts in asset allocation and the imposition of investment restrictions. These changes have presented a challenge for Advisors because a Contract as modified in this way may no longer be suitable for the Client. In addition, Contracts may contain provisions that require the Client to take action in order to avoid lapse of the guaranteed payment. If a Client fails to take such required steps, and as a result loses the guaranteed benefit, the Client may try to claim that the Advisor had an obligation to remind them of the required action. These provisions create risk that broker-dealers may want to consider mitigating.

How can broker-dealers address these challenges? One of the most effective ways to address these issues, at least as a first step, is Advisor training. Broker-dealers can review their Advisor training materials to ensure that the issues discussed above are addressed in an appropriate manner. Secondly, broker-dealers may want to consider a specific suitability review process for Contracts, to ensure that these issues are considered by the Advisor at the time the Advisor is making a recommendation of a specific Contract to a specific Client. Finally, broker-dealers may want to consider whether specific compliance/supervisory procedures that monitor changes to Contracts purchased by Clients are feasible.

Broker-dealers also should consider whether proactive steps for existing Contracts are warranted as a risk mitigation tool. These steps could include identifying those Contracts held by Clients that contain these provisions and determining whether monitoring of these Contracts is warranted and feasible. Where an existing Contract requires policyholder action to avoid lapse of the guarantee, broker-dealers should consider whether a communication to Clients about the lapse and the steps the Client needs to take to avoid the lapse is feasible. We can assist broker-dealers in developing specific compliance and supervisory procedures to help address these issues.


By Fred Reish and Bruce L. Ashton

In earlier newsletters, we discussed two of the key issues for selecting an insurance company to provide guaranteed income for retirees under 401(k) and other defined contribution plans. We explained that the process is not inherently different from - or more difficult than - other fiduciary decisions (for example, selecting investment products or providers). We pointed out that the DOL safe harbor regulation is helpful, but does not give specific guidance on what information should be reviewed. We described some of the information a plan committee or other fiduciary should consider, noting that a plan committee does not need to predict the future, but instead just needs to make an informed, prudent decision.

In this article, our focus is again on the fiduciary process of selecting an insurance company.

But first, why should a plan consider offering a lifetime income guarantee? By "lifetime income guarantee," we mean an annuity (or other product provided by an insurance company) that guarantees a stream of payments for the life of a retired participant, and possibly his or her spouse. The reason to offer a guarantee is to eliminate, or at least reduce, the risk that a retiree will outlive the money in his or her plan account or rollover IRA. Elements of this risk include the possibility of living longer than expected, market downturns at the "wrong" time, the impact of withdrawing retirement funds too quickly and the erosion of critical decision-making capacity as the retiree ages. A guarantee of payment for life addresses those risks.

How should a committee select an insurance company? ERISA requires fiduciaries to engage in a prudent process, which entails gathering and assessing relevant information and making a rational decision based on that information. But what if the committee just selects a well-regarded insurance company that has a long history of providing annuity benefits to thousands of annuitants? In one case, then Appeals Court Judge Antonin Scalia (now Supreme Court Justice Scalia) said that "[e]ven if a trustee failed to conduct an investigation before making a decision, he is insulated from liability if a hypothetical prudent fiduciary would have made the same decision anyway."1 In other words, if other fiduciaries would have chosen that insurance company after engaging in a prudent process, the committee making the same choice - but without conducting an investigation - would not be exposed to liability.

We are not advocating that fiduciaries avoid engaging in a prudent process. However, it may help a committee feel comfortable with its decision if it knows that many others have chosen that insurance company to provide guaranteed retirement income.

With that in mind, what information should a committee consider? Among other factors, some key issues for evaluating insurance companies include the following:

  • Whether the company is regulated by all, or almost all, of the states. The degree of scrutiny by state regulators varies from state to state, but many state agencies conduct thorough, detailed and rigorous investigations; fiduciaries can take comfort in their findings of soundness.
  • The company's commitment to the annuity or guaranteed income business assessed by the number of guaranteed income contracts and total assets in guarantees.
  • The quality and consistency of the company's ratings across all of the major rating agencies.
  • The consistency of the ratings over an extended period (generally, at least one economic cycle). The long-term financial stability of an insurance company - expressed by uniformly high ratings over extended periods of time - is particularly important for selecting a provider that will pay benefits many years in the future.

For further information regarding the issues discussed in this article, see the White Paper we published in May 2012 (co-authored with Joe Faucher) titled "Lifetime Income in Defined Contribution Plans: A Fiduciary Approach" at www.drinkerbiddle.com/resources/publications/2012/Lifetime-Income-in-Defined-Contribution-Plans?Section=Publications.


1 Roth v. Sawyer-Cleator, 16 F.3d 915, 919 (8th Cir. 1994); Herman v. Mercantile Bank, N.A. 143 F.3d 419, 420 (8th Cir. 1998). See also, Bussian v. RJR Nabisco, Inc., 223 F.3d 286, 300 (5th Cir. 2000): "ERISA's obligations are nonetheless satisfied if the provider selected would have been chosen had the fiduciary conducted a proper investigation." Note, however, that while the "hypothetical prudent fiduciary" standard may protect a fiduciary that engaged in an imprudent search from being liable for damages, it may not prevent an injunction against the fiduciary from acting on behalf of the plan in the future. See, Brock v. Robbins, 830 F.2d 640, 646-647 (7th Cir. 1987).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Frederick Reish
Bruce L. Ashton
Diana E. McCarthy
Joan M. Neri
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions