Directors, in addition to executives, soon may be targets of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
enforcement actions for failing to make a good faith attempt to
assure that a corporate information and reporting system is in
The FCPA, which prohibits bribery of foreign public officials in
order to obtain or retain business, includes accounting provisions
related to bookkeeping and internal controls. These accounting
provisions already have an expansive reach and can create pitfalls
to corporations and their employees. In addition, the internal
controls provision can pose a particular risk to board members,
audit committee members, and other independent directors.
There is real concern that the Department of Justice (DOJ)
and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may be
setting the stage to charge independent directors and members of
audit committees for knowingly failing to implement and/or maintain
a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide
reasonable assurances that transactions and assets are properly
authorized and recorded. In particular, directors may face internal
controls charges for failing to implement the controls necessary to
prevent improper payments, even in instances where the director is
not aware of the improper payment itself.
These risks should not be taken lightly, given the recent
increase in internal controls violations charges by the DOJ, and
the continued use of the internal controls charge by the SEC. For
additional guidance on how directors can protect against liability
for internal controls violations, read our
extended article in the FCPA Advisor.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In August 2016, a former risk officer wrote an opinion piece published by the Financial Times explaining his reason for allegedly rejecting a whistleblower award of USD 8.25 million (half of the 16.5 million total).
The SEC recently proposed new Rule 206(4)-4 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which would require registered investment advisers to adopt and implement business continuity and transition plans.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).