United States: Stanwich Clarifies Wagoner Rule In Fraudulent Transfer Cases

Last Updated: October 17 2013
Article by Daniel A. Lowenthal

In the Second U.S. Circuit, the so-called Wagoner rule deprives a trustee of standing to sue third parties, such as lawyers and investment bankers, if the bankrupt corporation participated with them in defrauding creditors. A recent decision from Connecticut clarifies the limitation of the Wagoner rule when a trustee asserts fraudulent transfer claims.

The case involved Settlement Services Treasury Assignments Inc. (SSTAI), which was sold in 1997 in a leveraged buyout (LBO). However, according to allegations in a lawsuit that followed, the deal rendered the company insolvent and unable to pay its debts, and the company's management had allegedly misappropriated corporate funds and improperly amended key corporate documents. SSTAI spiraled downward and, in 2001, filed for Chapter 11 in Connecticut. The debtor confirmed a plan in 2004, and a liquidating agent was appointed.

In 2002, the unsecured creditors' committee in the case had sued the company's principals and professionals to recover fraudulent transfers made in connection with the LBO. The liquidating agent later succeeded the committee as plaintiff in the action.

Early in the case, the Bankruptcy Court had ruled that the plaintiff lacked standing to assert certain claims because management had participated in the fraud. But earlier this year—13 years after the case began—an appellate judge reversed that decision and held that the plaintiff does have standing to assert fraud-related claims that had been dismissed.

At the heart of the case have been basic concepts of standing that apply when management of a company in bankruptcy has engaged in fraudulent conduct. "Whether a claimant has standing is the threshold question in every federal case, determining the power of the court to entertain the suit." Leasing by Paolo v. Sinatra (In re Cucci), 126 F.3d 380, 387- 88 (2d. Cir. 1997) (quoting Warth v, Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 (1975)).

The doctrine of standing stems from the U.S. Constitution's requirement that federal courts only decide cases or controversies. U.S. Const. art. III, sec. 2., cl. 1. "A plaintiff must allege a personal injury fairly traceable to the defendant's allegedly unlawful conduct and likely to be redressed by the requested relief." Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 751 (1984). The U.S. Supreme Court has held that "[a] plaintiff must always have suffered a 'distinct and palpable injury to himself' . . . ." Gladstone Realtors v. Village of Bellwood, 441 U.S. 91, 100 (1979) (quoting Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. at 501). In addition, the injury cannot be "abstract," "conjectural," or "hypothetical." City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 101-02 (1983). See Ass'n of Data Processing Serv. Orgs. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 464, 472 (1982).

Significantly, the "'case or controversy' requirement coincides with the scope of the powers the U.S. Bankruptcy Code gives a trustee." Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Wagoner, 944 F.2d 114, 118 (2d Cir. 1991). A debtor or trustee must "allege a personal injury fairly traceable to the defendant's allegedly unlawful conduct that is likely to be redressed by the requested relief." Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 72 F.3d 1085, 1091 (2d Cir. 1995), aff'g Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 178 B.R. 40 (D.Conn 1994) (Hirsch- District). "Under the Bankruptcy Code, the trustee stands in the shoes of the bankruptcy corporation and has standing to bring any suit that the bankrupt corporation could have instituted had it not petitioned for bankruptcy." In re Hampton Hotels Investors, L.P., 289 B.R. 563, 573 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003).

Moreover, "if a trustee has no power to assert a claim because it is not one belonging to the bankrupt estate, then he also fails to meet the prudential limitation that the legal rights asserted must be his own." Id. Whether a claim is property of a bankruptcy estate is determined by non-bankruptcy law, either state or federal. Id. And "[a] trustee has standing to sue third parties only if the debtor itself was damaged by the conduct of third parties." Hirsch-District, 178 B.R at 43. A trustee does not have standing to bring claims that belong to other parties, such as a debtor's creditors.


The adversary proceeding in SSTAI was brought in Connecticut, and thus precedent from the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals applied. The lead case in that jurisdiction regarding standing when a debtor has engaged in fraud is Wagoner, in which the 2nd Circuit stated that "when a bankrupt corporation has joined with a third party in defrauding its creditors, the trustee cannot recover against the third party for the damage to the creditors." Id. at 119.

In other words, a debtor does not have standing to assert claims if it was "complicit in the wrongdoing allegedly perpetrated by a third-party defendant." Giddens v. D.H. Blair & Co. (In re A.R. Baron & Co.), 280 B.R, 794, 800 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2002). If a debtor has engaged in misconduct, then the claims belong to the estate's creditors, not to the bankruptcy estate. As the 2nd Circuit stated in another case, "[a] claim against a third party for defrauding a corporation with the cooperation of management accrues to creditors, not the guilty corporation." Wight v. BankAmerica Corp., 219 F.3d 79, 86 (2d Cir. 2000).

In Wagoner, HMK Management Corporation had one stockholder and director. The company executed trades through a brokerage firm until the firm became concerned about HMK's trading activity and closed the accounts. HMK later filed for bankruptcy and a trustee sued the brokerage firm, alleging that it had engaged in wrongdoing. One claim asserted that the firm had churned HMK's accounts, and a second alleged that the brokerage had aided and abetted HMK in "making bad trades that dissipated corporate funds." Wagoner, 944 F.2d at 119.

The Second Circuit held that the bankruptcy trustee had standing to assert the first claim alleging churning, but not the second regarding the aiding and abetting allegation. HMK could have sued the brokerage firm for churning even if the company had not filed for bankruptcy. Therefore, the bankruptcy trustee had standing to assert that claim. But the Second Circuit ruled that the trustee could not assert the aiding and abetting claim because HMK had allegedly engaged in improper conduct. That claim belonged to the company's creditors, not to HMK and its bankruptcy

estate. Therefore, the doctrine of in pari delicto applied to deny the trustee standing because "the debtor's management had been a participant in wrongful activity." In re Hampton Hotels Investors, L.P., 289 B.R. at 576.

The Wagoner rule has an important exception known as the adverse interest exception, which provides that "management misconduct will not be imputed to the corporation if the [corporate] officer acted entirely in his own interests and adversely to the interests of the corporation." Id. In other words, the adverse interest exception would apply if the officer is said to be acting for his own benefit rather than that of the corporation. Accordingly, the corporation would have standing to sue a third party that damaged the corporation.

Key concepts of standing and the Wagoner rule have been front and center in the SSTAI litigation. SSTAI had served as a third-party administrator in situations resulting from lawsuits brought by seriously injured persons that were settled, resulting in the establishment of trusts to provide payments to those who were injured. SSTAI was the so-called assignment company that made the settlement payments to the beneficiaries. Under the structured settlements, tortfeasors or their insurers assigned the obligation to make the settlements to SSTAI with the payees' consent. Typically in such structured settlements, U.S. treasury bonds and/or annuities are bought to generate income over time to pay the obligations.

In 2002, the debtor and the unsecured creditors' committee stipulated that the committee could bring an adversary proceeding to recover transfers made as part of the LBO. Certain defendants challenged the committee's standing to bring the claims, but the Bankruptcy Court rejected their arguments, holding that, under Second Circuit precedent, the committee had "derivative standing" to bring estate claims when a debtor in possession was reluctant to do so. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Pardee (In re Stanwich Fin. Servs. Corp.), 2881 B.R. 24, 27 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2002).

In 2003, the committee sought to amend the initial complaint to add new claims, but the Bankruptcy Court, citing the Wagoner rule, denied the request to assert certain claims on behalf of the estate because the debtor arguably had participated in the fraud. Stanwich, 317 B.R. 224 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2004). In 2005, the litigating agent moved to amend the complaint again, this time to add factual details about the fraud. An appeal in the case, however, delayed the Bankruptcy Court's consideration of that motion for five years.

Finally, in April 2011, the Bankruptcy Court ruled that the liquidating agent did not have standing to assert fraudulent transfer claims against the debtor's former law firm and investment bank, again citing management's involvement in the fraud and the Wagoner rule. Judge Alan H.S. Shiff concluded that although the complaint deleted the words "aiding and abetting," the fraudulent transfer action was based on allegations that the law firm and investment bank had "assist[ed] or effectuate[d]" the LBO. Stanwich, Case No. 01-50831, Adv. Pro. No 02-5023, 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 1259, at *7 (Bankr. D. Conn. Apr. 7, 2011).

The liquidating agent moved for reconsideration, but the Bankruptcy Court denied that motion in September 2011. Stanwich, Case No. 01-50831, Adv. Pro. No. 02-5023, 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 3785 (Bankr. D. Conn. Sept. 30, 2011). The liquidating agent then appealed to the U.S. District Court, and that court reversed with respect to the fraudulent transfer claims asserted against the law firm and the investment bank. Stanwich, 488 B.R. 829 (D. Conn. 2013).

Standing in Another's Shoes

The Bankruptcy Code specifically affords a trustee standing to assert both state law and federal law fraudulent transfer claims under Sections 544 and 548, respectively. Section 544 permits a trustee to avoid a "transfer of property of the debtor" (Section 544(a)) or "of an interest of the debtor" (Section 544(b)), while Section 548 allows a trustee to avoid transfers of "an interest of the debtor."

As noted earlier, the Bankruptcy Court had dismissed these claims, ruling that the liquidating agent had essentially asserted aiding and abetting claims but without using those words. District Court Judge Stefan R. Underhill disagreed with that conclusion and analyzed the fraudulent transfer claims as they were pled and not as a pretext for other claims.

Underhill held that the liquidating agent had standing to pursue state law fraudulent transfer claims under Bankruptcy Code Section 544, even though management allegedly had engaged in the fraud at issue. He observed that "when acting under [S] ection 544(b), a trustee is vested with the rights of actual creditors to avoid certain transfers. So, even if the trustee itself is otherwise barred from asserting the claim because of Wagoner, the trustee, standing in the shoes of the creditors, is not barred from asserting the claim." Id. at 834. Underhill also noted that Wagoner cannot override Congress's express grant of standing to a trustee with respect to fraudulent transfer claims. In contrast, he concluded, the liquidating agent would not have standing to bring "fraud, malpractice, and other tort-based claims" against the law firm and the investment bank because of management's participation in the alleged wrongdoing. Id. Finally, the liquidating agent could not pursue the Bankruptcy Code Section 548 claim because the transfers at issue had occurred more than two years before the petition date. Therefore, that claim was barred by Section 548 itself rather than by the rules related to standing.

Clarifying Ruling

A debtor's wrongdoing prepetition limits what claims a debtor in possession or bankruptcy trustee can bring against third parties. Unless the adverse interest exception applies, a trustee will not have standing to sue third parties. But the recent decision in Stanwich makes clear that the Wagoner rule does not apply to fraudulent transfer claims. A trustee can bring those claims because they belong to the debtor's creditors and not to the debtor. J


1 SSTAI had been renamed Stanwich Financial Services Corp.

Previously published in the Journal of Corporate Renewal

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.