United States: Public Has Minimal Interest In Parties’ Confidential Information Not Central To A Decision On The Merits And Not Necessary To The Public’s Understanding Of The Case

In Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Nos. 12-1600, -1606, 13-1146 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 23, 2013), the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded because the district court abused its discretion in refusing to seal the confidential information at issue in the appeals.

Apple Inc. ("Apple") sued Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively "Samsung"), asserting, among other claims, that Samsung's smartphones and tablets infringed several of Apple's patents and infringed Apple's trade dress embodied in its iPhone and iPad products.  Samsung filed counterclaims, alleging that the iPhone and iPad infringed several of Samsung's patents.  The case proceeded to a jury trial.  The trial drew an extraordinary amount of attention from the public and the media.  Consistent with the extraordinary level of interest in the case, the district court explained to the parties that the whole trial was going to be open.  Consequently, the district court agreed to seal only a small number of trial exhibits.  Similarly, most exhibits attached to pretrial and post-trial motions were ordered unsealed.

The parties did not challenge many of the district court's unsealing orders on appeal.  Rather, the parties limited their appeals to a small subset of exhibits attached to pretrial and post-trial motions filed by Apple and Samsung.  First, the parties challenged the district court's August Order, which contained its rulings with respect to pretrial motions.  Second, Apple challenged the November Order, which contained the district court's rulings with respect to post-trial motions.

"We recognize the importance of protecting the public's interest in judicial proceedings and of facilitating its understanding of those proceedings.  That interest, however, does not extend to mere curiosity about the parties' confidential information where that information is not central to a decision on the merits.  While protecting the public's interest in access to the courts, we must remain mindful of the parties' right to access those same courts upon terms which will not unduly harm their competitive interest."  Slip op. at 24.

The Federal Circuit explained that the broad issue on appeal was whether the district court abused its discretion in ordering the unsealing of the documents Apple and Samsung sought to seal.  The Court began its analysis by reviewing "the common law right of access to judicial records."  Slip op. at 9 (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)).  The Court noted that, in the Ninth Circuit, a party seeking to seal judicial records can overcome the strong presumption of access to court records by providing "sufficiently compelling reasons" that override the public policies favoring disclosure.  Id. at 10 (quoting In re Midland Nat'l Life Ins. Annuity Sales Practices Litig., 686 F.3d 1115, 1119 (9th Cir. 2012)).  Further, the Court explained that the Ninth Circuit has carved out an exception to the presumption of access to judicial records for such records filed under seal when attached to a nondispositive motion.  Thus, a particularized showing of "good cause" under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) is sufficient to preserve the secrecy of sealed discovery documents attached to nondispositive motions.

The Court then considered whether the district court applied the correct legal standard.  The Court explained that while the district court recognized the Ninth Circuit's general rule that a party seeking to seal documents attached to a nondispositive motion need only demonstrate "good cause," the district court nevertheless applied the "compelling reasons" standard to documents attached to nondispositive motions regarding the admissibility of evidence at trial "[b]ecause the admissibility of evidence is such a closely contested issue in this trial, which has become crucial to the public's understanding of the proceedings."  Id. at 12 (alteration in original) (citation omitted).  Finding legal error, the Court stated that it was not aware of any Ninth Circuit precedent applying the "compelling reasons" standard to nondispositive motions regarding the admissibility of evidence at trial.  The Court additionally stated that the district court's reasoning did not justify departure from the Ninth Circuit's general rule.  Despite the district court's error, the Federal Circuit reviewed all of the district court's orders under the more restrictive "compelling reasons" standard and concluded that, even under that standard, the district court erred in refusing to seal the documents at issue on appeal, as discussed in more detail below.

With respect to the documents at issue in Apple's and Samsung's appeals of the August Order, the parties challenged the district court's ruling with respect to a total of twenty-six documents—fourteen Apple documents and twelve Samsung documents—filed as exhibits in connection with pretrial motions.   Notably, the parties did not seek to seal these documents in their entirety.  Instead, as the Court explained, they sought to redact limited portions of the documents containing detailed product-specific financial information, including costs, sales, profits, and profit margins.  The Court began by stating that Apple and Samsung have an interest in keeping their detailed product-specific financial information secret because they could suffer competitive harm if this information is made public, and the district court erred by concluding otherwise.  In addressing the public's interest in the parties' detailed financial information, the Court noted that, in these appeals, Apple and Samsung had limited the documents they had challenged to a small subset of the documents they had originally sought to seal.  The Court further pointed out that, even within that small subset, they sought only to redact limited portions that contained what they considered their most confidential financial information.  Moreover, because the parties agreed to rely on less-detailed financial information to prove their damages at trial, none of the documents were introduced into evidence.  Thus, the Court reasoned, the financial information at issue was not considered by the jury and is not essential to the public's understanding of the jury's damages award.  The Court continued, nor is there any indication that this information was essential to the district court's rulings on any of the parties' pretrial motions.  Accordingly, the Court concluded that the particular financial information at issue in the appeals was not necessary to the public's understanding of the case, and that the public therefore had minimal interest in that particular information.

Finally, the Court considered the documents at issue in Apple's appeal of the November Order.  Specifically, Apple challenged the district court's ruling with respect to nine Apple market research reports, which Samsung attached to its opposition to Apple's post-trial motion for a permanent injunction and enhanced damages.  The reports totaled approximately five hundred pages, only twelve of which were cited by Samsung in its briefing.  Apple agreed to make public seven of those pages and, as for the remaining five pages cited by Samsung, Apple agreed to make that information public insofar as it pertained to customer information from the United States, but sought to redact the customer information for other countries not relied on by Samsung in its briefing.  The Court found that the nine market research documents contained information that Apple's competitors could not obtain elsewhere.  The Court noted the critical distinction between Apple's competitors being able to "infer the most significant results by simply observing Apple's product releases and marketing campaigns," and being able to predict Apple's future product releases and marketing strategies.  Id. at 23 (citation omitted).  Further, the Court noted that because Apple had agreed to make public all of the information contained in these documents that was actually cited by the parties or the district court, the other information in these reports was irrelevant to the public's understanding of the judicial proceedings.  Thus, the Court concluded that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to seal the nine market research documents.

Judges: Prost (author), Bryson, O'Malley

[Appealed from N.D. Cal., Judge Koh]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, September 2013

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Nov 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Finnegan partner Anthony Tridico will present “U.S. Patent Case Law Update” at the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys’ annual Patent Case Law Review.

28 Nov 2017, Seminar, Milan, Italy

Finnegan partner John Paul will present “Internet of Things: Patent Liability, Enforcement and Licensing” and will join the Mock WIPO Mediation at International Technology Transfer—Licensing and ADR, co-hosted by Licensing Executives Society and World Intellectual Property Organization.

29 Nov 2017, Seminar, Tel Aviv, Israel

Finnegan is a platinum sponsor IVC Research Center’s start-up forum, “The Most Promising Start Ups for 2017 – A Synergy of Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Vision and IoT.”

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.