United States: SEC Proposes Long-Awaited Pay Ratio Rules

On September 18, 2013, in a 3-2 vote of commissioners cast along party lines, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") proposed rules to implement Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 ("Dodd-Frank").1 Section 953(b) directs the SEC to promulgate rules to require public companies to disclose the median annual total compensation of all employees other than the chief executive officer ("CEO"), the annual total compensation of the CEO, and the ratio of these two amounts (the "pay ratio rules").2 Total compensation is to be calculated in the same manner as in the summary compensation table.3 The proposed pay ratio rules would provide flexibility for registrants to use statistical sampling and estimates to identify median employees and would allow registrants to determine the statistical methodology that is appropriate to their unique circumstances. The SEC reports having received over 20,000 comment letters on Section 953(b) even before announcing its proposed rules, and in the proposing release solicits public comment on a wide range of topics. In view of the many questions that remain under consideration, it seems likely that final pay ratio rules will not be adopted until sometime during 2014.


There has been significant debate on the merits of compelling pay ratio disclosure, as exemplified by the supporting and dissenting statements of the SEC commissioners at the open meeting on September 18, 2013. Critics argue that pay ratio disclosure would be incendiary, unclear, misleading and potentially harmful for investors, that the ratio would not take the CEO's performance into account, that compliance will be costly, and that the disclosure requirement may give a competitive advantage to registrants that are not subject to the rules (or, as discussed below, less burdened by the rules). Supporters of pay ratio disclosure counter that the information will increase transparency and help investors to assess whether companies are investing in their employees, or focusing only on compensating top executives. These supporters note that CEO pay has spiraled relative to rank-and-file employee pay. According to a study published by Bloomberg.com, average CEO compensation at the companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index has increased 20% since 2009, and is now 204 times that of rank-and-file employees.4 According to the Economic Policy Institute, this ratio was just 20 to 1 in 1965.5 In the proposing release, the SEC notes its attempt to address the concerns of commentators and cites extensively to letters it received. The contentious nature of pay ratio disclosure and the practical challenges presented in crafting workable rules help explain the delay in the SEC's promulgating the proposal: more than three years have elapsed between the adoption of Dodd-Frank and the issuance of the SEC's proposed rules.

Summary of Proposed Pay Ratio Rules

The proposed pay ratio rules would add new paragraph (u) to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, which would require registrants to disclose the median annual total compensation of its entire employee population (other than the CEO), the annual total compensation of the CEO, and the ratio of the two.

Where Pay Ratio Disclosure is Required

The disclosure would be required in filings that mandate executive compensation disclosure under Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including annual reports on Form 10-K and registration, proxy and information statements to the extent that disclosure under Item 402 of Regulation S-K is required therein. Although Section 953(b) of Dodd-Frank could be read to require pay ratio disclosure in all SEC filings, the SEC reasons that it would not be helpful to include this disclosure as a stand-alone item in filings that do not otherwise require executive compensation disclosure, and suggests that locating the proposed rules within the existing executive compensation disclosure regime would help reduce the compliance burden.

Covered Registrants

The proposed rules would cover only those registrants required to provide summary compensation disclosure under Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K. The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the "JOBS Act") specifically exempts emerging growth companies from Section 953(b),6 and Instruction 6 to the proposed rules gives effect to that exemption. The SEC would also exempt smaller reporting companies and foreign private issuers on the theory that these companies are not required to disclose compensation of their named executive officers pursuant to Item 402 and that Section 953(b) does not require the SEC to expand the scope of companies that are subject to Item 402.

Covered Employees

The proposed rules require that the median total compensation be determined based on a measure of all of a registrant's employees, including temporary, seasonal, part-time and non-US employees and those employed by direct and indirect subsidiaries of the registrant, but, notably, excluding independent contractors and leased employees. While the proposed rules would allow registrants to use statistical sampling to determine the median employee among all employees (further discussed below), the release makes it clear that the rules would not allow similar flexibility in determining the universe of employees from which the median must be determined.7 The rules would allow, but not require, registrants to annualize compensation for permanent employees employed for less than the registrant's full fiscal year (i.e., employees hired during the year) but would not allow annualizing of compensation for seasonal or temporary employees. The rules would also prohibit full-time equivalent adjustments for part-time employees and cost-of-living adjustments. The SEC has requested comment on whether to allow the flexibility to make part-time and cost-of-living adjustments and whether to include leased employees, as the exclusion of leased employees has the potential to encourage outsourcing both domestically and abroad. The SEC has also requested information on data privacy laws and regulations that may impact the collection or transfer of employee data.

Calculation Date and Covered Time Period

The proposed rules would require registrants to determine the median by reference to those employed as of the last day of the registrant's fiscal year, a calculation date consistent with the date used to determine the named executive officers under Item 402 of Regulation S-K. To accommodate any registrant whose fiscal year differs from the annual period used for payroll or tax recordkeeping, for purposes of estimating the median employee only, the proposed rules would permit the registrant to use the same year that is used in the payroll or tax records from which the compensation amounts are derived; however, a registrant using payroll or tax records to identify the median employee would then be required to calculate total compensation of that median employee for the last completed fiscal year.

Identifying the Median

In response to concerns that calculating the annual total compensation of all of a registrant's employees under the Item 402 rules would be unduly burdensome if not impossible, the proposed rules require instead a comparison of the compensation of a "median employee" to the compensation of the company's CEO. The SEC, moreover, has proposed a flexible approach for identifying the median employee and determining median total compensation. The proposed rules would give registrants discretion to determine a methodology for identifying the median employee appropriate to their size and structure, including the use of statistical sampling, random sampling, reasonable estimates of total compensation or a reasonable determination of the median employee through a review of more readily identifiable figures, such as total direct compensation (including salary, hourly wages and any performance-based pay). A flexible approach would allow registrants to seek to reduce costs and fit each registrant's unique circumstances, as long each registrant consistently applies its chosen methodology.

In the proposing release, the SEC acknowledges that the costs of compliance may vary greatly among registrants based on a number of factors, including their size and complexity, the nature of their workforce and operations, the location of their operations and the level of integration of their payroll systems and employee data. The SEC suggests that registrants in industries having low wage variances (e.g., the motor vehicle manufacturing and coal mining industries) may have appropriate sample sizes of less than one hundred employees. In contrast, industries having high wage variances (e.g., the spectator sports and motion picture and video industries) may have minimum appropriate sample sizes of more than 1,000 employees. Appropriate sample sizes would be further affected by the existence of multiple businesses or geographic segments. The SEC acknowledges that the proposed pay ratio rules may place a disproportionately higher burden on large multinational companies and companies that operate across multiple industries. In addition, including temporary and seasonal workers could potentially skew the median employee's compensation lower. Nevertheless, the SEC reasons that, overall, the use of sampling would help to minimize costs and the time necessary to identify the median.

The SEC also acknowledges that the flexibility of the proposed rules could reduce the comparability of the required disclosure across registrants. More generally, the SEC recognizes that, even within the same industry, comparability from registrant to registrant will be impaired by the use of different business models (e.g., franchise or company-owned chains), the differences in cost of living and labor in different countries and other factors.8 The SEC reasons that pay ratio disclosure would nonetheless be useful for investors in evaluating the CEO's pay within the context of his or her own company even if it has limited utility as a benchmark for compensation levels among companies. Further, the SEC notes its belief that mandating a particular methodology for identifying the median employee would not necessarily improve the comparability of the disclosure across different companies because of the many other factors that would affect the ratio.

Instead of requiring all registrants to conform to a single methodology for determining the median, the proposed pay ratio rules would require the consistent application of a particular methodology by each registrant. According to the SEC, this would provide clarity and add a level of predictability to the ratio, and would help to guard against the risk of manipulation of the methodologies to reach a more favorable ratio.

The SEC requests comments on whether the flexible approach proposed would be fair and workable, whether this approach would in fact help to reduce the cost and other burdens of providing the disclosure and whether any alternative approaches would better address the challenges relating to collecting data. For example, the SEC requests comment on whether requiring two separate pay ratios, one using US employees and the other using non-US employees, would be useful for investors. The SEC is also requesting comments on the estimated costs of compliance and whether the utility of the disclosure would justify the costs.

The proposed rules do not provide guidance on how a registrant should calculate the pay ratio if the methodology used to identify the median employee points to multiple individuals; a registrant that uses only salary and wages to identify the median, for instance, might identify more than one employee at the median level. Whether a registrant in this situation would be required to calculate total compensation in accordance with Item 402(c) for all employees at this level remains to be seen.

Total Compensation

Once a registrant has identified the median employee, it would be required under the proposed rules to determine that employee's total compensation in accordance with Item 402(c) (the rules governing the summary compensation table). However, to address the concern of some commentators that calculating certain elements of total compensation in accordance with Item 402(c), such as benefits, pensions and equity compensation, would be overly burdensome,9 the SEC included in the proposed rules the option to use "reasonable estimates" to calculate the annual total compensation or any elements of total compensation for employees other than the CEO.

Item 402 allows registrants to omit disclosure of benefit plans and perquisites of named executive officers that are, in the aggregate, valued at less than $10,000. In the context of CEO compensation, such amounts are unlikely to have a material impact on the total compensation reported; for average employees, on the other hand, benefits (e.g., tax-exempt health benefits, transportation/parking benefits, education assistance) may constitute a meaningful portion of the employee's overall compensation package and excluding them may tend to understate median compensation. Under the proposed rules, in calculating total compensation of the median employee, a registrant could elect to include benefit plans and perquisites that are equal to less than $10,000 as long as comparable benefits paid to the CEO are included in the determination of the CEO's total compensation. In that case, any difference between the total compensation of the CEO used for the pay ratio and that used in the summary compensation table would also need to be disclosed.

Disclosure of Methodologies

Registrants would be required under the proposed rules to briefly disclose the methodology used and any material assumptions, adjustments or estimates used to identify the median or determine total compensation or any elements of total compensation. Instruction 2 of the proposed rules clarifies that only a "brief overview" is required for the disclosure; the SEC notes that an "overly technical analysis" could be dense and confusing to investors. The proposed rules would allow for reasonable supplemental information, including additional pay ratios (i.e., comparing pay of other employee groups), as long as the supplemental information is clearly designated as supplemental and would not confuse investors.

Finally, the proposed rules require that registrants disclose any material changes to the methodology or material assumptions, adjustments or estimates. In the event that changes result in a material change to the ratio, the proposed rules would require the registrant to describe the reason for the change and provide an estimate of the impact of the change on the median and the ratio. As with the requirement that registrants use a consistent methodology, this requirement is intended to guard against the risk that a registrant would manipulate methodologies to reach a more favorable ratio.

Proposed Transition Period

The SEC proposes that registrants would be required to begin to comply with the pay ratio rules with respect to the first fiscal year commencing on or after the effective date of the rules. As explained above, the disclosure would then need to be included in the registrant's Form 10-K, proxy statement or registration statement no later than 120 days after the end of the relevant fiscal year. Thus, if the pay ratio rules were to go into effect in 2014, a registrant with a fiscal year ending December 31 would first be required to comply with the rules with respect to the 2015 fiscal year and would be required to include the disclosure for the first time in its Form 10-K, proxy statement or registration statement filed in 2016.

For newly public companies, the proposed rules would require initial compliance with respect to compensation for the first fiscal year commencing on or after the date the company becomes subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").

Timing for Disclosure

The proposed rules generally would require that the disclosure be updated annually, at the time of the filing of the registrant's annual report on Form 10-K or, if later, the filing of a proxy or information statement for the registrant's annual shareholder meeting, but not later than 12o days after the end of the registrant's fiscal year. However, if the registrant omits salary or bonus information for the CEO in reliance on Instruction 1 to Item 402(c)(2)(iii) and (iv) because the amounts are not calculable at the time of filing, the proposed rules would permit the registrant to provide the pay ratio disclosure in the same filing in which the CEO's initially omitted compensation information is disclosed.

Disclosure to be Deemed "Filed"

The proposed rules provide that the pay ratio disclosure will be considered "filed" for purposes of liability under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act and is therefore subject to the certification requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act.10


Due to the continuing controversy surrounding the pay ratio disclosure and the many topics on which the SEC has solicited comment, we expect that the SEC will receive thousands of comments on the proposed rules. The process of revising the proposal to address these comments is likely to further delay the issuance of final rules. Because of the significant potential burden of the pay ratio rules, companies should nevertheless begin thinking about possible methodologies to comply with the rules in light of the companies' specific circumstances and business models. In light of the challenges analyzed above, we believe that a company's determination of the most appropriate methodology will likely be a lengthy and costly process as it considers alternate compliance methodologies. To prepare for implementation of the pay ratio rules, companies could, for example, review their different payroll and employee data systems and determine the payroll and employee information available from non-US subsidiaries, experiment with different sampling methods, identify the compensation and benefit programs available globally and consider the compensation measure (e.g., base salary or other direct compensation) to determine the median employee. No action is required, however, until the SEC adopts final rules.


1. Release Nos. 33-9452 and 34-70443; File No. S7-07-13. SEC Chair Mary Jo White and Commissioners Luis A. Aguilar and Kara M. Stein voted in favor of the proposal. Commissioners Michael S. Piwowar and Daniel M. Gallagher voted against it.

2. Section 953(b) states that the SEC shall amend Section 402 of Regulation S-K "to require each issuer to disclose in any filing of the issuer described in Section 229.10(a) of title 17 [(proxy requirements)] . . . (A) the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the issuer, except the chief executive officer (or any equivalent position) of the issuer; (B) the annual total compensation of the chief executive officer (or any equivalent position) of the issuer; and (C) the ratio of the amount described in subparagraph (A) to the amount described in subparagraph (B)." Total compensation, for purposes of Section 953(b) "shall be determined in accordance with section 229.402(c)(2)(x) of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of [the Dodd-Frank Act]."

3. See Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K.

4. Bloomberg.com, "Top CEO Pay Ratios," published April 30, 2013. Available at http://go.bloomberg.com/multimedia/ceo-pay-ratio/ and http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-30/ceo-pay-1-795-to-1-multiple-of-workers-skirts-law-as-sec-delays.html.

5. Economic Policy Institute, "CEOs made 231 times more than workers did in 2011," published 2012. Available at http://www.epi.org/news/ceos- 231-times-workers-2011/.

6. See JOBS Act Section 102(a)(3). Our related publications on the JOBS Act are available at http://www.shearman.com/jobs-act-signed-into-law/.

7. We note that registrants may encounter tracking issues in complying with the requirement to include seasonal and part-time employees.

8. For instance, the pay ratio for companies with significant numbers of part-time and seasonal employees may be inflated when compared to other companies, while companies that outsource low-paying work or rely heavily on independent contractors may benefit from an artificially low ratio. Further, a company with employees primarily located in countries where wages are generally lower may appear to have an inflated ratio when compared to a company whose employees are primarily located in the United States.

9. Companies with multiple payroll systems at different locations might find it particularly challenging to standardize compensation information.

10. Section 18 of the Exchange Act imposes liability for material misstatements or omissions for "filed" disclosure. "Furnished" disclosure under Regulation FD, such as the disclosure of certain market information made to institutional investors, does not attract liability under Section 18.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.