United States: New Jersey Supreme Court Requires Law Enforcement To Secure A Warrant Before Obtaining Location Data From Wireless Carriers

Last Updated: September 17 2013
Article by Paul G. Nittoly

On July 18, 2013, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously found a state constitutional right to privacy protecting a mobile phone user's location data (as broadcast by a powered-on mobile device).  The New Jersey Supreme Court's decision in State v. Earls, 2013 WL 3744221 (N.J. 2013), has far-reaching implications in the criminal context, as the Court now requires law enforcement to secure a warrant before obtaining location data from wireless carriers unless there is an applicable warrant exception.  This newly-articulated privacy right under New Jersey law may also impact wireless carriers, although the full extent to which remains to be seen.  The State v. Earls decision can be contrasted with the recent July 30, 2013 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which held that historic mobile call location data is not specifically protected by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.  See In re: Application of the United States of America for Historical Cell Site Data, No. 11–20884, 2013 WL 3914484 (5th Cir. 2013).  The differing outcomes from the Fifth Circuit and the New Jersey Supreme Court highlight the broader privacy protections afforded citizens by the New Jersey State Constitution. 


In January 2006, the Middletown (N.J.) Police Department was investigating residential burglaries.  The police believed Thomas Earls was responsible and was keeping the stolen property in a storage locker he rented with his former girlfriend, Desiree Gates.  Gates led the police to the locker, in which the officers found stolen property.  The next day, Gates' cousin informed police that she had not seen Gates since Gates had assisted the police with the investigation, and that Earls, having learned of Gates' cooperation, threatened her well-being.  Earls, Slip Op. at 5-6.

The police filed a complaint against Earls and obtained an arrest warrant.  During a search for Earls and Gates, the police contacted Earls' wireless carrier, and requested the location of Earls' mobile phone.  The police did not obtain a warrant for the mobile phone location data.  Earls' wireless carrier provided this information three separate times.  The location data led the police to a specific radius in which the officers ultimately located Earls' car in the parking lot of a motel.  At 3 a.m., the police called the room in which Earls and Gates were staying and asked Gates to come outside.  When Earls opened the door, the police arrested him.  Inside the room, the police observed several items that turned out to be stolen.  Id. at 6-9.  

The Opinion

Writing for a unanimous Court in State v. Earls, Chief Justice Rabner found that Earls had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location data broadcast by his mobile phone, as protected by the New Jersey Constitution.  Id. at 29-33.  The Court plainly articulated that law enforcement must obtain a warrant based on a showing of probable cause, or qualify under an exception to the warrant requirement, in order to acquire mobile phone location information from a wireless carrier.  Id. at 34.  The Court held that the use of mobile phone location data "is akin to using a tracking device and can function as a substitute for 24/7 surveillance without police having to confront the limits of their resources."  Id. at 29.  Because wireless carriers are able to pinpoint a mobile device within a very small geographic range, which can be sometimes narrowed to a particular floor or room of a building, the Court found this technological capability involves a degree of intrusion that a reasonable person would not anticipate.  Moreover, the Court was concerned that tracking the location of a mobile device could provide an intimate picture of one's daily life and reveal "not just where people go – which doctors, religious services, and stores they visit – but also the people and groups they choose to affiliate with and when they actually do so."  Id.  

In light of the ubiquitous presence of mobile devices and their continuous transmission of data when powered-on, the Court held that law enforcement's warrantless access to location data is a violation of a citizen's reasonable expectations of privacy.  "Although individuals may be generally aware that their phones can be tracked, most people do not realize the extent of modern tracking capabilities and reasonably do not expect law enforcement to convert their phones into precise, possibly continuous tracking tools."  Id. at 32.            

Previously, in 2010, the New Jersey Legislature, recognizing the inherent privacy issues in mobile phones' tracking ability, passed a statute requiring law enforcement to obtain a court order for mobile phone location information upon a showing that is less demanding than the probable cause standard for the issuance of warrants. N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-29e.  The Court's holding in Earls imposes the more rigorous probable cause standard on law enforcement before it can obtain mobile device location information from a wireless carrier.  Earls, Slip Op. at 32.  The Court's ruling applies only to Defendant Earls and any future cases and takes effect thirty days from the date of the Court's July 18, 2013 opinion.  Id. at 38.  

The Earls decision was premised on the broader rights conferred by the New Jersey State Constitution than are necessarily afforded by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.  Shortly after the Earls decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled on whether similar "historical cell site data" was protected by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution – and, consequently – whether Courts considering applications filed by the United States government under the Stored Communications Act (SCA), see 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2712, should apply a probable cause standard.  The Fifth Circuit appeal arose from three SCA applications filed by the United States for Orders requiring wireless providers to produce sixty days of historical cell site data for particular mobile phones.  In re: Application of the United States of America, Slip Op. at 1.  The Southern District of Texas rejected certain parts of the government's application and held that the SCA was unconstitutional and violated the Fourth Amendment because it permitted the government to obtain location information merely based on a showing of "specific and articulable facts," and not probable cause.  Id. at 6.  On appeal, in a 2 to 1 decision, a Fifth Circuit panel overturned the District Court's decision and found no such Fourth Amendment violation.  Instead, the Fifth Circuit found the SCA was not unconstitutional because the location data is monitored and stored by the wireless carriers for their own business purposes.  Id. at 15, 18-24.  Thus, the Court held that the data the government sought amounted to "business records" under existing Fourth Amendment jurisprudence for which the government did not need probable cause.  The Fifth Circuit's analysis struck a different tone and generally downplayed the privacy issues surrounding location data that carriers retain and which caused the New Jersey Supreme Court such deep concern.  The Fifth Circuit's determination that this location data is not entitled to Fourth Amendment protection does not diminish the significance of the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision in Earls and has no impact on the warrant requirement imposed by the Court on local law enforcement within in its jurisdiction. 

Implication for Clients 

The Earls decision was limited to the criminal context and the obligations of New Jersey law enforcement when requesting mobile device location data.  For criminal defendants or subjects of law enforcement investigations, this means the police must have probable cause (with limited exception) to pinpoint an individual's location using a carrier's continuously available location data.  The New Jersey Supreme Court's decision makes clear, however, that if one of the recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement applies, a warrant is not required.  New Jersey recognizes several categories of exceptions to the warrant requirement: the "exigent" or emergency circumstances exception; the exception for when consent is given to law enforcement for the search; the exception for when evidence is in the plain view or plain smell of law enforcement; the exception for searches incident to arrest; the exceptions for searches of an automobile under certain circumstances; the exception for searches conducted by school officials and other regulatory authorities; the exception for undercover agents entering premises for the purpose of conducting business; the exception for searches conducted initially by third parties; and the exception for searches conducted out of concern for the safety of persons or property.  See Miller v. Glover, No. CIV.A. 09-2891 JAP, 2012 WL 870728, at *14 (D.N.J. Mar. 14, 2012).  At issue in Earls, and the subject of the New Jersey Supreme Court's remand of the case to the Appellate Division, was whether the exigent (or emergency) circumstances exception applied to the police's acquisition of defendant's mobile phone location data from the wireless carrier.  Earls, Slip Op. at 40.  The exigent circumstances exception encompasses a number of emergency situations in which the police do not need a warrant to search: hot pursuit of a suspected felon, the possibility that evidence may be damaged or destroyed, and danger to the lives of citizens or law enforcement officers.  United States v. Coles, 437 F.3d 361, 366 (3d Cir. 2006).  Although further clarity from the Courts will be needed, certain of these warrant exceptions likely could not apply to the acquisition of mobile phone location data; for example, such location data would never be in a police officer's "plain view" because it can only be obtained by law enforcement through a request to the carrier.

In addition, the Earls Court did not specifically address the impact of its decision on wireless carriers themselves.  Thus, the Court did not address what burden, if any, is placed on a wireless carrier when faced with a warrantless request from New Jersey law enforcement.  But, as detailed above, the decision clearly recognizes that there will be circumstances in which a warrant is not required for law enforcement to obtain the location data; e.g., during an emergency situation.  Because the Court articulated that the New Jersey Constitution protects the privacy of a customer's real-time location data, the Earls decision could also have broader implications for wireless carriers, specifically concerning how they use and disclose this type of subscriber information at least with respect to New Jersey subscribers.  To the extent they do not do so already, wireless carriers should therefore treat this location information as protected Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and take steps to prevent unauthorized disclosure to third parties.  Carriers may also consider updating their wireless subscriber agreements or otherwise seek subscriber consent in the event that location data is disclosed to third-party sources aside from law enforcement.  The full extent of the Earls decision, including the possible extension to a civil context, remains to be seen.  The fact that there have been two appellate decisions regarding the level of protection afforded mobile phone location data in such a short timeframe evidences that this is an evolving area of the law that warrants close attention.  Drinker Biddle will stay abreast of any developments in this area as the Earls decision goes into effect and will inform our clients of any relevant decisions or updates in the law. 

Drinker Biddle has extensive experience representing clients in the telecommunications industry.  The firm counsels clients on issues relevant to a wireless carrier's relationships with subscribers.  Additionally, the firm maintains a robust white collar criminal defense and corporate investigations practice, and counsels clients on how to navigate interactions with local, state and federal law enforcement.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions