United States: Limitation Period For Trustee Avoidance Action Expanded?

Last Updated: September 17 2013
Article by Francis J. Lawall and Michael J. Custer

Generally, there is a specific statute of limitations governing trustee avoidance actions in a bankruptcy case. Thus, it would have been fair for most defendants to believe that if a claim had not been asserted prior to the expiration of the statutory deadline, none would be forthcoming. However, in light of a recent decision by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, that may no longer be the case. In Burtch v. Opus LLC (In re Opus East LLC), No. 11-52423, 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 3150 (Aug. 6, 2013), U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary F. Walrath found that a debtor's failure to list certain transfers in the statement of financial affairs filed with its bankruptcy petition constituted concealment, thereby equitably tolling the statute of limitations for their avoidance.

As a result, and even though there was no accusation or finding that the newly-added defendants themselves committed wrongdoing, the court permitted the Chapter 7 trustee to amend his complaint well after the statute of limitations expired to add new defendants and new transfers, totaling over $33 million. This decision highlights the unfortunate possibility that circumstances outside the control of a potential defendant could dramatically alter its potential exposure. Bankruptcy practitioners should take note of this decision and be sure to identify all prepetition transfers to their clients, whether pleaded before or after the statute of limitations has expired, to avoid risking a game-changing surprise well into the litigation.

The debtor, Opus East, filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition July 1, 2009. The trustee, Jeoffrey L. Burtch, was appointed the next day. On June 30, 2011 (the eve of the expiration of the limitations period for avoidance claims under the Bankruptcy Code), Burtch filed a 47-count complaint against more than a dozen defendants asserting both common law and bankruptcy avoidance claims. Roughly 10 months later, Burtch sought and was granted leave to amend the complaint to add 13 more counts. Approximately six months after that, Burtch again amended the complaint when the court partially granted the defendants' motion to dismiss.

On March 6, 2013, nearly four years after the debtor filed its bankruptcy petition and nearly two years after the statute of limitations for bankruptcy avoidance actions appeared to have expired, Burtch moved for leave to amend the complaint again, seeking to add seven new counts for avoidance and recovery of two allegedly fraudulent and preferential transfers, totaling $33.5 million, against two new defendants. The newly-named defendants opposed Burtch's motion on two grounds: (1) the amendment was futile because it was added after the applicable statute of limitations had expired and did not relate back to the original complaint, and (2) the operative scheduling order prohibited the trustee from amending the complaint.

The court first analyzed the defendants' statute of limitations affirmative defense. Walrath acknowledged that the amendment was filed more than two years after the bankruptcy petition date and therefore after the statute of limitations had expired. The amendment was consequently futile unless the added claims related back to the original complaint or the statute of limitations could be equitably tolled.

With respect to whether the new claims related back to the original complaint, the new defendants argued that the allegations had no factual nexus to the original complaint because they relied upon an entirely new set of facts and transactions rather than restate a pleaded claim with greater particularity. The court agreed, concluding that the facts alleged were completely new and used to support claims different from those raised in the original complaint. The defendants also argued that the relation-back requirements under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were not met because the original complaint lacked detail with respect to the transactions forming the basis for the amendment to provide sufficient notice that additional allegations may be pursued. Burtch argued in response that the general recovery language in the original complaint was sufficient to put the new defendants on notice that new allegations may be brought. Again the court agreed with the defendants, finding that the original complaint, which specifically identified by amount, transferor and transferee the transfers to be avoided, did not describe at all the new transfers sought to be avoided. The court therefore found that the new claims did not relate back to the claims articulated in the original complaint.

The court then turned to Burtch's argument that the statute of limitations was equitably tolled. The new defendants argued that equitable tolling was inapplicable because they did not affirmatively conceal any information from Burtch regarding the transfers. The defendants also argued that equitable tolling was not appropriate because Burtch failed to perform his statutory obligation to thoroughly investigate the financial affairs of the debtor. Specifically, Burtch did not satisfy the appropriate level of due diligence required because he was in possession of the debtor's books and records prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations and could have reasonably learned of the transfers at issue.

Burtch responded that the defendants' conduct was irrelevant to the equitable tolling analysis and that the debtor's negligent concealment of the transfers on its statement of financial affairs permitted equitable tolling. With respect to the defendants' argument that he failed to perform his statutory obligation to investigate, Burtch argued that he properly relied on the debtor's sworn statement of financial affairs, which did not include the transfers at issue, to meet his statutory obligation. Burtch argued that he could not have reasonably been expected to learn about the transfers prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations without some indication that they existed.

Walrath agreed with Burtch that equitable tolling applied. It was undisputed that the debtor failed to list the transfers on its statement of financial affairs. The court found this to be sufficient evidence of the debtor's concealment of the transfers. It was reasonable for Burtch to rely on the information Opus East provided because there was no indication the schedules were inaccurate.

The court also agreed that Burtch sufficiently carried out his duty of due diligence in seeking to learn the facts regarding the transfers. Walrath stated that Burtch "was not required to conduct an overwhelming search to specifically seek out transfers that were not listed on the debtor's sworn schedules. The trustee is entitled to rely on the information provided by the debtor in its statement of financial affairs and should not be expected to reconstruct the debtor's financial affairs on a hunch of possible concealment." The court found this was particularly so where Opus East listed more than 1,400 other transfers on its schedules and Burtch had no reason to believe Opus East had failed to list other transfers. Burtch could not be expected to search Opus East's books and records without any reason to believe all transfers were included in the sworn schedules. Consequently, the court concluded that Burtch could not reasonably have been expected to learn the facts regarding the transfers at issue until the discovery process began in the adversary proceeding, after the statute of limitations otherwise would have expired.

The court also disposed of the defendants' argument that the scheduling order in the adversary case precluded amending the complaint and no good cause existed to do so because Burtch's lack of diligence was the cause of his failure to amend earlier. The court found good cause did exist because Burtch was not aware of the transfers at issue until they were the subject of deposition testimony roughly a year after the deadline to amend the pleadings under the scheduling order.

The Opus decision applied the equitable tolling doctrine despite both the lack of any inequitable conduct by the defendants and the nearly three-year period the trustee had to review the debtor's books and records and identify avoidable transfers. This amount of time would seem to present a trustee or debtor with sufficient time to review the debtor's books and records and identify and plead all transfers sought to be avoided. The Opus decision, however, makes clear that equitable tolling may still be invoked to permit such missed transactions to be pleaded. Therefore, since it is not uncommon for a debtor's schedules to contain errors, this decision serves as an important lesson for practitioners representing potential defendants to identify the full scope of their client's potential liability, regardless of whether certain transfers had been pleaded prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. Otherwise, a client may face the same unpleasant surprise as did those new Opus defendants, who found themselves exposed to dramatically increased liability well into the litigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Michael J. Custer
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.