United States: Limitation Period For Trustee Avoidance Action Expanded?

Last Updated: September 17 2013
Article by Francis J. Lawall and Michael J. Custer

Generally, there is a specific statute of limitations governing trustee avoidance actions in a bankruptcy case. Thus, it would have been fair for most defendants to believe that if a claim had not been asserted prior to the expiration of the statutory deadline, none would be forthcoming. However, in light of a recent decision by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, that may no longer be the case. In Burtch v. Opus LLC (In re Opus East LLC), No. 11-52423, 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 3150 (Aug. 6, 2013), U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary F. Walrath found that a debtor's failure to list certain transfers in the statement of financial affairs filed with its bankruptcy petition constituted concealment, thereby equitably tolling the statute of limitations for their avoidance.

As a result, and even though there was no accusation or finding that the newly-added defendants themselves committed wrongdoing, the court permitted the Chapter 7 trustee to amend his complaint well after the statute of limitations expired to add new defendants and new transfers, totaling over $33 million. This decision highlights the unfortunate possibility that circumstances outside the control of a potential defendant could dramatically alter its potential exposure. Bankruptcy practitioners should take note of this decision and be sure to identify all prepetition transfers to their clients, whether pleaded before or after the statute of limitations has expired, to avoid risking a game-changing surprise well into the litigation.

The debtor, Opus East, filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition July 1, 2009. The trustee, Jeoffrey L. Burtch, was appointed the next day. On June 30, 2011 (the eve of the expiration of the limitations period for avoidance claims under the Bankruptcy Code), Burtch filed a 47-count complaint against more than a dozen defendants asserting both common law and bankruptcy avoidance claims. Roughly 10 months later, Burtch sought and was granted leave to amend the complaint to add 13 more counts. Approximately six months after that, Burtch again amended the complaint when the court partially granted the defendants' motion to dismiss.

On March 6, 2013, nearly four years after the debtor filed its bankruptcy petition and nearly two years after the statute of limitations for bankruptcy avoidance actions appeared to have expired, Burtch moved for leave to amend the complaint again, seeking to add seven new counts for avoidance and recovery of two allegedly fraudulent and preferential transfers, totaling $33.5 million, against two new defendants. The newly-named defendants opposed Burtch's motion on two grounds: (1) the amendment was futile because it was added after the applicable statute of limitations had expired and did not relate back to the original complaint, and (2) the operative scheduling order prohibited the trustee from amending the complaint.

The court first analyzed the defendants' statute of limitations affirmative defense. Walrath acknowledged that the amendment was filed more than two years after the bankruptcy petition date and therefore after the statute of limitations had expired. The amendment was consequently futile unless the added claims related back to the original complaint or the statute of limitations could be equitably tolled.

With respect to whether the new claims related back to the original complaint, the new defendants argued that the allegations had no factual nexus to the original complaint because they relied upon an entirely new set of facts and transactions rather than restate a pleaded claim with greater particularity. The court agreed, concluding that the facts alleged were completely new and used to support claims different from those raised in the original complaint. The defendants also argued that the relation-back requirements under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were not met because the original complaint lacked detail with respect to the transactions forming the basis for the amendment to provide sufficient notice that additional allegations may be pursued. Burtch argued in response that the general recovery language in the original complaint was sufficient to put the new defendants on notice that new allegations may be brought. Again the court agreed with the defendants, finding that the original complaint, which specifically identified by amount, transferor and transferee the transfers to be avoided, did not describe at all the new transfers sought to be avoided. The court therefore found that the new claims did not relate back to the claims articulated in the original complaint.

The court then turned to Burtch's argument that the statute of limitations was equitably tolled. The new defendants argued that equitable tolling was inapplicable because they did not affirmatively conceal any information from Burtch regarding the transfers. The defendants also argued that equitable tolling was not appropriate because Burtch failed to perform his statutory obligation to thoroughly investigate the financial affairs of the debtor. Specifically, Burtch did not satisfy the appropriate level of due diligence required because he was in possession of the debtor's books and records prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations and could have reasonably learned of the transfers at issue.

Burtch responded that the defendants' conduct was irrelevant to the equitable tolling analysis and that the debtor's negligent concealment of the transfers on its statement of financial affairs permitted equitable tolling. With respect to the defendants' argument that he failed to perform his statutory obligation to investigate, Burtch argued that he properly relied on the debtor's sworn statement of financial affairs, which did not include the transfers at issue, to meet his statutory obligation. Burtch argued that he could not have reasonably been expected to learn about the transfers prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations without some indication that they existed.

Walrath agreed with Burtch that equitable tolling applied. It was undisputed that the debtor failed to list the transfers on its statement of financial affairs. The court found this to be sufficient evidence of the debtor's concealment of the transfers. It was reasonable for Burtch to rely on the information Opus East provided because there was no indication the schedules were inaccurate.

The court also agreed that Burtch sufficiently carried out his duty of due diligence in seeking to learn the facts regarding the transfers. Walrath stated that Burtch "was not required to conduct an overwhelming search to specifically seek out transfers that were not listed on the debtor's sworn schedules. The trustee is entitled to rely on the information provided by the debtor in its statement of financial affairs and should not be expected to reconstruct the debtor's financial affairs on a hunch of possible concealment." The court found this was particularly so where Opus East listed more than 1,400 other transfers on its schedules and Burtch had no reason to believe Opus East had failed to list other transfers. Burtch could not be expected to search Opus East's books and records without any reason to believe all transfers were included in the sworn schedules. Consequently, the court concluded that Burtch could not reasonably have been expected to learn the facts regarding the transfers at issue until the discovery process began in the adversary proceeding, after the statute of limitations otherwise would have expired.

The court also disposed of the defendants' argument that the scheduling order in the adversary case precluded amending the complaint and no good cause existed to do so because Burtch's lack of diligence was the cause of his failure to amend earlier. The court found good cause did exist because Burtch was not aware of the transfers at issue until they were the subject of deposition testimony roughly a year after the deadline to amend the pleadings under the scheduling order.

The Opus decision applied the equitable tolling doctrine despite both the lack of any inequitable conduct by the defendants and the nearly three-year period the trustee had to review the debtor's books and records and identify avoidable transfers. This amount of time would seem to present a trustee or debtor with sufficient time to review the debtor's books and records and identify and plead all transfers sought to be avoided. The Opus decision, however, makes clear that equitable tolling may still be invoked to permit such missed transactions to be pleaded. Therefore, since it is not uncommon for a debtor's schedules to contain errors, this decision serves as an important lesson for practitioners representing potential defendants to identify the full scope of their client's potential liability, regardless of whether certain transfers had been pleaded prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. Otherwise, a client may face the same unpleasant surprise as did those new Opus defendants, who found themselves exposed to dramatically increased liability well into the litigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Michael J. Custer
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions