Christopher Roe was quoted in the Environment Reporter
article "Hazard Ranking Proposal Incorporating Vapor Intrusion
Seen as Possible This Year." While the full text can be found
in the August 2, 2013, issue of Environment Reporter, a
synopsis is noted below.
Roe told a BNA webinar on July 30 that the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) could issue, as soon as December, a
proposed rule that would include vapor intrusion into the
agency's hazard ranking system. The ranking system is used to
determine the highest priority sites for the superfund National
The EPA has said the proposed rule would not add a significant
number of sites to the NPL because it "already has a full
plate," Roe said.
"But we'll see how it plays out," he told the
webinar, held to discuss recent developments in vapor intrusion
guidance and regulation and their regulatory implications for
remediation, transactions and litigation.
Vapor intrusion is the migration of chemicals from contaminated
soil or groundwater into overlying buildings.
"The big issue that remains is whether USEPA will
reconsider its limitation of the use of [petroleum vapor intrusion]
guidance and its practical approach to petroleum contamination at
UST sites, as opposed to refineries and other locations with
significant petroleum in the subsurface," Roe told BNA in an
email after the webinar.
Recent developments in EPA's Integrated Risk Information
System will affect the vapor intrusion guidance as well, Roe
Roe also stated that the key issues to consider when evaluating
OSWER's vapor intrusion guidance include where such guidance is
needed, how much study is enough, characterizing risk,
communicating about risk and results, gaining access to a site, and
challenges to the mitigation option.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals issued a significant decision in Maryland Department of the Environment, et al. v. Anacostia Riverkeeper, et al., holding that the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Permit issued by the Maryland Department of the Environment to Montgomery County, Md., violated the Federal Clean Water Act and state of Maryland law.
Settling federal environmental enforcement actions is one of the most important environmental legal challenges faced by regulated entities, be they multi-national corporations, small family businesses...
Those who have tried to keep up with the development of environmental law into the second decade of the 21st century will not be surprised, as others may be, by the attention now focused on reuse of soil.
What are the politics of climate change? A new poll done by Stanford University and Resources for the Future suggests that the public may be more ready to regulate carbon carbon taxthan has previously been thought.
After Sackett, the question on everyone’s mind was "How far does it go?" The first test of that question was the decision by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals – not known as a bastion of liberalism – in Belle Company v. Corps of Engineers, holding that a Corps jurisdictional determination is not final agency action subject to judicial review.