United States: Forum Selection Provisions Upheld By Delaware Chancery Court

Forum Selection Provisions Upheld By Delaware Chancery Court

On June 25, 2013, the Delaware Chancery Court upheld the validity of forum selection provisions in the bylaws of Delaware corporations adopted without shareholder approval.1 Forum selection provisions are located in either a corporation's charter or bylaws and designate specific courts as the exclusive forum where certain types of litigation may be brought. This decision was the first time a Delaware court addressed the validity of these provisions and was welcome news to many Delaware corporations and their management due to the benefits that these provisions can provide.

Background

In recent years, lawsuits against Delaware corporations and their officers and directors have increasingly been brought and decided outside of Delaware. For example, lawsuits against Delaware public company directors went from being decided in Delaware approximately 80% of the time in the mid-90s down to an average of 31% from 2005 to 2009.2 This "flight from Delaware" has been driven by plaintiffs' attorneys who perceive the Delaware courts as being more management and corporate defendant friendly, more consistent in their interpretation of Delaware corporate law, more predictable in their decisions and more likely to reduce oversized attorneys fees.3 In addition, public corporations have increasingly become subject to multiple lawsuits in different jurisdictions relating to essentially identical claims brought by the same class of plaintiffs at the same time. Often, consolidating these multiple lawsuits into one single action can be difficult if not impossible. Duplicative, concurrent multi-forum lawsuits are detrimental to corporations and their shareholders because they significantly increase the costs of litigation, expose corporations to the risk of receiving multiple and potentially conflicting decisions and increase the uncertainty of outcomes and the risk of misapplication of Delaware law by courts in other jurisdictions.

In an effort to address these issues, many corporations began adopting forum selection provisions in their charters or bylaws, especially following a 2010 decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery that suggested in dicta that corporations should consider adopting forum selection clauses to protect themselves and their shareholders from "frequent filer" law firms that do not serve the shareholders' best interests.4 To date, more than 300 public companies have adopted forum selection provisions in their organizational documents.5 However, the pace at which corporations were adopting these provisions stalled during the past year following the commencement in February 2012 of shareholder lawsuits against 12 Delaware corporations whose boards had amended their bylaws without shareholder approval to add forum selection provisions challenging the validity of such provisions.6 Most of the defendants quickly repealed their bylaws, making the lawsuits moot. Two of the defendants, Chevron and FedEx, defended their forum selection bylaws, and their cases were consolidated to allow the Delaware Chancery Court to decide the facial validity of these provisions generally.

Delaware Chancery Court Decision

In their complaints, the plaintiff shareholders argued that forum selection provisions were (i) statutorily invalid because their adoption exceeded the board's authority under the Delaware General Corporate Law ("DGCL"), and (ii) contractually invalid because they were adopted without shareholder assent. With respect to the first claim, the Chancery Court held that the plain language of the forum selection provisions are statutorily valid because DGCL Section 109(b) permits bylaws "relating to the business of the corporation, the conduct of its affairs, and its rights or powers or the rights or powers of its stockholders, directors, officers or employees." The court reasoned that since the forum selection provisions at issue were limited in nature and focused on disputes related to the company and the relationships between shareholders, officers and directors, these provisions clearly fell within the scope of permissible bylaws provisions as prescribed by DGCL Section 109(b). The court added, however, that forum selection provisions would not be statutorily valid if they limited the types of lawsuits that could be brought, or specified a forum for claims that are not related to the internal matters of the corporation or rights of its shareholders.

With respect to the second claim, the court held that the forum selection provisions are contractually valid and enforceable for two reasons. First, the certificate of incorporation for both Chevron and FedEx, similar to most Delaware corporations, expressly grants the company's board the power to unilaterally adopt bylaws. Second, these provisions put shareholders on notice that bylaws could be amended at any time by the board without prior notice to, or approval of, the company's shareholders. In the court's view, the shareholders effectively consented to the possibility of new bylaws being adopted without their consent when they bought stock of corporations governed by such charters. If shareholders did not like any amendments to the bylaws unilaterally adopted by the board, the court reasoned that the shareholders always have the power to repeal such amendments through a majority vote.

The court refused to address a "parade of hypothetical horribles" posed by the plaintiffs to argue that the forum selection bylaws could potentially conflict with law or have unreasonable or inequitable consequences, stating such hypothetical situations did not present a genuine controversy based on concrete facts. However, the court did acknowledge that while forum selection provisions are valid as a matter of Delaware corporate law, they are nonetheless still subject to challenge. Shareholder plaintiffs, the court explained, can always sue in their preferred forum and respond to defendant's motion to dismiss for improper venue by arguing, based on actual facts, that the forum selection provisions should not be respected because their application would be unreasonable or that such provisions were being used for improper purposes inconsistent with the directors' fiduciary duties.

Forum Selection Provisions

Forum selection provisions for Delaware corporations typically prescribe Delaware as the exclusive forum to govern four types of litigation: (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the corporation, (ii) any action asserting a claim for breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee to the corporation or the corporation's shareholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws of the corporation or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Forum selection provisions generally limit their scope to these categories because (a) they are the types of litigation that can be brought by any shareholder in a representative capacity on behalf of all shareholders or on behalf of the corporation and (b) they are limited to matters that are governed by Delaware law. Accordingly, these provisions do not limit the ability of plaintiffs to bring actions in the forum of their choosing outside of Delaware with respect to claims that do not fall within the scope of the forum selection provision, such as claims based on violations of federal securities law or tort claims.

Proxy Advisors on Forum Selection Provisions

Some boards may seek shareholder approval of forum selection provisions to insulate themselves from potential shareholder challenges. Obtaining shareholder support can prove difficult because proxy advisors generally advise shareholders to vote against forum selection provisions, viewing the right of shareholders to bring suit in any forum of their choosing to be fundamental. In the past two years, a dozen companies sought shareholder approval to add forum selection provisions to their charters. Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis recommended against all of them; nine eventually passed, two were rejected, and one was withdrawn. In addition, during 2012 there were four stockholder proposals to repeal forum selection provisions that were unilaterally adopted by the board and all of these proposals were supported by ISS and Glass Lewis. Despite this support, two of these shareholder proposals were defeated.

ISS does not separately factor in forum selection bylaws in its corporate governance score.7 However, when considering recommending against forum selection provisions up for vote in a proxy, ISS will consider whether a company has proxy disclosure that it has been materially harmed by litigation in a jurisdiction outside its state of incorporation and what governance "best practices" the corporation does have in place (e.g. annually elected board, majority voting for uncontested elections, shareholder approved poison pill).8

Similarly, Glass Lewis is skeptical of forum selection provisions, which it views as a means of discouraging shareholder derivative actions, but it may support them if a corporation can show the provision will directly benefit shareholders, provides evidence that the corporation has been the victim of frequent frivolous lawsuits or misapplications of Delaware law, and otherwise maintains good corporate governance practices.9 In addition, if a forum selection provision is part of a bundled proposal to change a company's charter or bylaws, Glass Lewis will weigh the positive and negative changes to determine their net effect for shareholders.10

Still, if a new public company has a forum selection provision in place, Glass Lewis will recommend voting against the chairman of the corporate governance committee, and if no such chairman exists, the chairman of the board.11 Glass Lewis also recommends voting against the chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee if a company adopted an exclusive forum provision without shareholder approval in the last year or is currently seeking approval for one as part of a bundled proposal to amend the company's charter or bylaws.12

What's Next?

On the heels of the Chevron-FedEx decision, we will likely see an increase in the adoption of forum selection provisions by corporations that do not already have them due to their obvious benefits of reducing duplicative multi-forum litigation along with the risks and corporate waste that such litigation entails. In addition, the expertise and predictability of the Delaware courts weigh in favor of Delaware companies adopting a forum selection provision. While Chevron-FedEx provides clarity on the fundamental premise that forum selection provisions in bylaws are facially valid, boards 4 Mayer Brown | Forum Selection Provisions Upheld By Delaware Chancery Court should always be mindful of their ever-present fiduciary duties and make sure that the adoption and application of forum selection provisions are always being made in the best interest of the corporation and its shareholders.

Footnotes

1 Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund, et al. v. Chevron Corp., et al., C.A. No. 7220-CS (Del. Ch. June 25, 2013); Iclub Inv. P'ship v. FedEx Corp., C.A. No. 7238-CS (Del. Ch. June 25, 2013).

2 Thomas T. McClendon, The Power of a Suggestion: The Use of Forum Selection Clauses by Delaware Corporations, 69Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 2067, 2072 (2012).

3 Id. at 2076-2078.

4 In re Revlon, Inc. S'holders Litig., 990 A.2d 940 (Del. Ch. 2010).

5 Joseph A. Grundfes and Kristen A. Savelle, The Brouhaha Over Intra-Corporate Forum Selection Provisions: A Legal, Economic, and Political Analysis, 68 Bus. Law 325 (2013).

6 Claudia H. Allen, Exclusive Forum Provisions: Putting on the Brakes, Corporate Accountability Report, 10 CARE 1286, Dec. 14, 2012.

7 ISS Governance QuickScore, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (2013), available at: http://www.issgovernance.com/files/ISSGovernanceQui ckScoreTechDoc.pdf.

8 2013 SRI U.S. Proxy Voting Guidelines, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (2013), 3a-17, available at: http://www.issgovernance.com/files/2013ISSSRIUSPoli cy.pdf.

9 Glass Lewis & Co., Proxy Paper Guidelines: 2013 Proxy Season (2012), section 5, available at: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/33934/00013 9834413001180/fp0006524_ex99votereg.htm.

10 Id.

11 Id. at Section 2.

12 Id.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2013. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Troutman Sanders LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Troutman Sanders LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions