United States: Affidavits Or Declarations Are Not Always Required When Submitting Arguments Concerning Lack Of Enablement Of Prior Art Reference

In In re Morsa, No. 12-1609 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2013), the Federal Circuit vacated the Board's enablement and anticipation determinations, affirmed the Board's obviousness conclusions, and remanded to the Board for further proceedings, including an enablement analysis in accordance with the Court's instructions.

On April 12, 2001, Steve Morsa filed a patent application that disclosed a method and apparatus for receiving a benefit information request from a user, searching a benefit information database for benefits matching the user's request, and then returning benefit information to the user.  During proceedings before the PTO, the examiner rejected the application as unpatentable over a single reference, Peter Martin Associates Press Release ("PMA").  The PMA is a September 27, 1999, publication that announced the release of "Help Works, Web Edition," a product that allowed consumers to use the Internet to screen themselves for benefits, services, and health risks, among other features.  The examiner found that the PMA anticipated certain claims of the application and rendered obvious the remaining claims.  Morsa appealed to the Board. 

On appeal to the Board, Morsa made three main arguments.  First, he argued that the PMA, while dated September 27, 1999, was not prior art because (1) a later publication stated that Help Works, Web Edition launched in 2001; (2) the PMA publishing website stated that it would not be held liable for publication inaccuracies; and (3) a trademark registration for HelpWorks, Web Edition stated that the mark was first used in commerce in 2001.  Second, Morsa argued that the PMA was not enabling because it lacked enough detail to be able to produce or practice the claimed invention based solely on a reading of the PMA, whose two relevant paragraphs totaled only 117 words.  Third, Morsa argued that the differences between the application's claims and the prior art were sufficient to support a finding of nonobviousness.

The Board concluded that the PMA was prior art, that it was presumed enabling because of a lack of evidence to the contrary, and that the examiner's anticipation rejections were proper.  Regarding the examiner's obviousness rejections, the Board found that Morsa failed to present any evidence of objective factors for the Board to consider, and that the differences between the prior art and the claimed invention were not sufficient to overrule the examiner's rejections on certain claims.  However, the Board indicated certain claims as patentable over the PMA.  Following two requests for rehearing, which were subsequently denied by the Board, Morsa appealed.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board's decision on the PMA being prior art.  Since the PMA was clearly marked with a date of September 27, 1999, the Court concluded that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding on this point.

"The presumption in Antor is a procedural one—designed to put the burden on the applicant in the first instance to challenge cited prior art; the PTO need not come forward with evidence of enablement before it may rely upon a prior art reference as grounds for a rejection.  Once an applicant makes a
non-frivolous argument that cited prior art is not enabling, however, the examiner must address that challenge."  Id. at 9-10 (citing In re Antor Media Corp., 689 F.3d 1282, 1288 (Fed. Cir. 2012)).

Next, the Court turned to the Board's decisions on enablement and anticipation.  In its decision on rehearing, the Board concluded that the PMA was presumed enabling because Morsa failed to provide any affidavits or declarations to support arguments to the contrary.  On appeal, the PTO relied on In re Antor Media Corp., 689 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2012), which held that publications used as prior art by the PTO are presumed enabling, to support a presumption that the PMA was an enabled reference.  In determining that the Board's presumption was improper, the Court held that "[t]he presumption in Antor is a procedural one—designed to put the burden on the applicant in the first instance to challenge cited prior art."  Slip op. at 9.  But "[o]nce an applicant makes a non-frivolous argument that cited prior art is not enabling, . . . the examiner must address that challenge."  Id. at 10.  The Court also held that, while an applicant must generally do more than state an unsupported belief of lack of enablement, it is not necessarily the case that the applicant must submit affidavits and submissions in support of its arguments.  Since Morsa identified specific, concrete reasons why he believed the PMA was not enabling, the Court held that the Board had erred in not addressing these arguments.

The Court also found unpersuasive the Director's argument that the PMA should be considered enabling because it was "at least as enabling" as Morsa's application.  Id.  On this issue, the Court stated that "an examiner must determine if prior art is enabling by asking whether a person of ordinary skill in the art could make or use the claimed invention without undue experimentation based on the disclosure of that particular document."  Id.  Moreover, the Court held that "the anticipation exercise must assess the enabling nature of a prior art reference in light of the proposed claims."  Id.  The Court concluded that the application far exceeded the level of detail in the PMA and, absent a finding that the application's disclosure was unrelated to the claimed invention, the Court could not agree with the PTO's comparison between the two documents. 

The Court then reviewed the examiner's and the Board's obviousness findings.  During prosecution, the examiner found that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to configure the product described in the PMA to perform the various recitations in the claims.  As to these findings, the Federal Circuit found that they were supported by substantial evidence.  The Court also affirmed the Board's rejection of Morsa's argument that objective factors weighed in favor of a finding of nonobviousness.  The Court explained that, although the case law requires the Board to consider evidence of objective factors in its obviousness determinations, Morsa had merely listed the objective factors without proffering any supporting evidence.  Thus, the Court ruled that the Board did not err in failing to consider evidence of objective factors, since there was no evidence to consider.  Finally, the Federal Circuit reviewed the examiner's factual findings regarding the PMA rendering obvious certain claims of the application, and agreed with the Board's decision that the claims would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art.

Accordingly, the Court affirmed-in-part the Board's ultimate legal conclusions of obviousness.  Based on the improper enablement analysis, however, the Court vacated the Board's anticipation findings and remanded for further proceedings.

Judges:  Rader, Lourie, O'Malley (author)
[Appealed from Board]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, May, 2013

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
14 Nov 2018, Conference, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan is a Silver sponsor of the sixth annual World Intellectual Property Forum, hosted by Intellectual Professionals LLP. Finnegan partner Clare Cornell will present “Trademarks v. Company Names” and partner Patrick Coyne will present “Current Issues in U.S. Patent Law and Reform: The Next Wave”

16 Nov 2018, Seminar, Copenhagen, Denmark

Innovative companies, large and small, use patents to protect their key inventions. Obtaining valuable patents, however, requires skilled patent counsel and an in-depth knowledge of the legal requirements for securing claims that are strategically useful to your company.

17 Nov 2018, Conference, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan partner Clare Cornell will present “Covert Trademark Use in the Internet: Licit or Illicit” at the Asian Patent Attorneys Association Conference.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Foley & Lardner
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Foley & Lardner
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions