United States: (Really) Red Ink: $45 Million Settlement On Ink Imports Highlights The Significance Of Country Of Origin Analysis

Last Updated: April 29 2013
Article by Gregory S. McCue and Victoria E. Murphy

In December 2012, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a $45 million settlement with an importer of pigment used in ink manufacturing.  The importer had been charged with misdeclaring the country of origin of the pigment.  The issue was whether certain intermediate processing operations were sufficient for the imported product to be declared as originating in the country where the processing occurred.  The publicly-released description of the settlement – and the large settlement amount – highlights the importance of country of origin analysis.  Examined closely, the case also is a useful reminder that products do not always have just one country of origin.  US law requires different types of origin analyses for different situations.

Toyo Ink is a Japan-based company with worldwide operations.  Carbazole violet pigment number 23 (CVP-23) is a colorant used in the manufacture of ink.  Since 2004, imports of CVP-23 have been subject to antidumping duties for imports from India and China (ADs) ranging from 5.51% to 217.94%, and additional countervailing duties (CVDs) on imports from India ranging from 17.33% to 33.61%.  These additional import duty percentages are assessed at time of entry – but only on CVP-23 that originates from China or India.  For any CVP-23 manufactured in any other country, these additional US import duties do not apply.

The DOJ announced that Toyo paid the $45 million settlement in order to resolve allegations of false origin declarations – no determination of liability was made.  However, the charges (now settled) were that Toyo had knowingly misrepresented the country of origin in its import declarations for CVP-23, in order to avoid paying the ADs and CVDs that otherwise would have been collected by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at importation.  Toyo sourced its inputs from China and India, but sent the raw material to Japan or Mexico for processing into finished CVP-23.  Upon arrival in the United States, Toyo declared that Japan or Mexico was the country of origin and, accordingly, that the ADs and CVDs did not apply.  The US Government took the position that the finishing process in Japan or Mexico was insufficient to substantially transform the CVP-23, so that the correct country of origin – even of the finished product – remained the country of origin of the raw CVP-23 (China or India), and the additional AD/CVD duties should have been paid upon US importation. 

In the DOJ statement, Stuart F. Delery, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Division, warned that the Toyo settlement “demonstrates that the Department of Justice will zealously guard the public fisc – taking action not only against those who fraudulently obtain government funds, but also against those who inappropriately avoid paying money owed to the United States.”  Similarly, Anne M. Tompkins, US Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, stated, “Fair and lawful trade requires importers to truthfully identify their products and pay the appropriate duties.  Our office will vigorously investigate and prosecute importers who make false representations and claims designed to avoid the payment of lawful import duties.”

Although the DOJ announcement states that the (now settled) charges against Toyo were for knowing misdeclaration of origin, it is useful to contrast this ink case with another recent country of origin controversy surrounding products subject to ADs.  In February of this year, the US Government announced commercial fraud charges in connection with misdeclared country of origin of honey.  Honey also is subject to ADs, but only when produced in China, not from any other country.  However, in the honey case, the imports subject to enforcement did not experience any further processing outside of China.  Reports indicate that the honey was entirely of Chinese origin and was shipped directly to the United States, or merely through a third country, and simply declared as originating in a country other than China in order to avoid the additional duties.  In the honey case, the fraud is clear because the honey experienced no processing outside of China, so no country other than China could have been the correct origin for the honey that arrived in the United States.

In contrast, in the CVP-23 case, there was at least some processing outside China and India.  The DOJ notice does not describe the extent of the later processing in Japan or Mexico nor does it state whether anyone involved might have reasonably believed that the further processing properly changed the origin of the goods.  If that processing had been “substantial,” as defined by US law, the origin of the CVP-23 would have changed.  In that case, US law would have required Toyo to declare a country of origin other than China or India.  This aspect of the Toyo case demonstrates the importance for importers to review the processing operations experienced by a product in various countries before arrival in the United States, and to compare those operations to the country of origin definition that applies to the specific product being declared.  Most importantly, importers and purchasers must always keep in mind that the country of origin analysis required by US law will change depending upon the product being declared.  For example:

  • US imports:  For many goods imported into the United States, the country of origin to be declared upon importation, and to be marked on the goods, will be the country in which the item experienced its last “substantial transformation” before arriving in the United States.  “Substantial transformation” is defined by the CBP Regulations as a change in “name, character or use.”  This analysis will change according to the nature of the product and importers often will need to review CBP rulings on similar products to determine which processing can be considered “substantial.”  In addition to CBP’s usual enforcement penalties, imported goods not properly marked are subject to an additional 10% duty on the value of the imported goods.  Moreover, textiles are subject to their own origin rules that require careful scrutiny to determine the correct country of origin.

  • AD/CVD:  For the CVP-23, separate from the origin analysis for the CBP declaration and marking of the goods, the origin for AD/CVD purposes was governed by an analysis required by the US Department of Commerce (DOC).  Unhelpfully, the DOC’s analysis also is called “substantial transformation,” just like the one used by CBP.  However, the DOC’s test is not the same at CBP’s test for declaration and marking purposes, even though several of the same themes are covered.  The DOC’s analysis for AD/CVD purposes can occasionally result in an origin result different from the CBP test.

  • US Free Trade:  Determining the country of origin of an item according to “substantial transformation” does not mean that US law regards the item as a product of that country for all purposes.  Free trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and import programs such as the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) each have their own definitions of country of origin.  NAFTA origin usually requires an analysis of the harmonized tariff numbers for the finished good and its inputs and may require an analysis of local value content.  GSP requires an analysis of both substantial transformation and local value content, with exceptions for certain products (not to mention expiration of the GSP program from time to time).  Other programs such as the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act, and other US free trade agreements with Chile, the Dominican Republic and Central America, Israel, Jordan, Korea, Morocco, Singapore, and other  countries, each have their own definition of origin.  In order to claim duty-free treatment under any one of those programs, the US importer typically must review the standard for that specific program and collect the commercial documents showing that specific standard for that program has been met by the item being imported.  In addition, the trade agreements’ rules may require a separate analysis for country of origin marking.

  • Made in USA:  Even if a product is proven to be processed in the United States such that it no longer must be marked with a foreign country of origin (or even can be declared as US-origin if re-imported), this does not mean that the goods can be marked “Made in USA” when sold in the United States.  The “Made in USA” description is governed by an entirely separate set of rules from the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The FTC requires that “all or virtually all” inputs and labor be of US origin before a “Made in USA” (or similar language) marking or advertisement may be used.  This is a much higher standard than parts from various countries being “substantially transformed.”  It is fairly common for an item to be processed in the United States from imported inputs such that a foreign country of origin marking is not required under CBP rules, but a “Made in USA” marking still is not permitted under FTC rules.  The FTC permits less absolute statements to be used (such as “Assembled in USA” or “Produced in USA from imported parts”) depending on the specific facts.

  •  US Government Procurement:  Regardless of the country of origin found and declared for the imports above, the US Government has further, separate standards for the items it purchases.  Some items purchased by the US Government are subject to the Buy America Act, which requires manufacturing in the United States and 50% US value content.  However, government procurement purchases more often are subject to the Trade Agreements Act (TAA) which permits purchases of goods that are US-origin or that originate from one of several countries with which the United States has a specific treaty arrangement.  The TAA requires goods to be (1) entirely produced in the United States or one of the designated countries, or (2) “substantially transformed” in an approved country.  TAA substantial transformation analysis does rely on CBP standards and rulings, which should be reviewed before certifying compliance to the US Government.  

In the Toyo case, the CVP-23 from India or China was subject to product-specific AD/CVD orders, but the risk arising from errors in a country of origin analysis is much broader than AD/CVD enforcement.  In addition to the usual penalties and enforcement that can come from CBP or the other government agencies described above, country of origin is increasingly seen as an issue that can be addressed under the False Claims Act (FCA).  Under the FCA’s qui tam provision, whistleblowers can sue on behalf of the US government and receive a portion of any funds recovered under the suit.  The allegations that Toyo Ink was making false origin claims for AD/CVD purposes on imports of CVP-23 were first made in a whistleblower lawsuit filed under the FCA by John Dickson, the president of a US producer of CVP-23.  Reports estimate that Mr. Dickson’s share of the Toyo settlement as more than $7,875,000.  Numerous reports, websites and blogs have publicized the Toyo payout as an example of the benefits of filing whistleblower claims in these situations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Gregory S. McCue
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.