ARTICLE
19 April 2013

Driverless Car Technology – Legislation Slow To Keep Pace

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
A critical legal issue becomes who is liable when there is an accident where the driver, was by design, not in control of the vehicle.
United States Transport
Foley & Lardner are most popular:
  • within Wealth Management and Coronavirus (COVID-19) topic(s)

Major technology companies have already logged 300,000 miles on U.S. roads with self driving cars. Driverless (or automated or autonomous) vehicle technology is rapidly advancing and states are starting to enact legislation. Driverless car technology has the ability to attract billions in research dollars to those states that create the right legal framework for the development and testing of driverless vehicles. Tangible benefits of this technology include, safer roads, faster commutes, and increased mobility for persons with disabilities. While fully driverless cars are years away, at least one auto industry CEO predicts that driverless cars will be in showrooms by 2020.

A critical legal issue becomes who is liable when there is an accident where the driver, was by design, not in control of the vehicle. Who is to blame, the automaker, the occupant, the car's owner, the supplier that designed or retrofitted the technology? Driverless car technology promises to be heavily regulated, not only by states, but federally by the NHTSA. Although there are no specific federal regulations yet, a patchwork of state laws is forming.

Nevada, California, and Florida already have passed laws governing driverless vehicles. Michigan is currently considering legislation. Governor Rick Synder (Michigan) in his January State of the State address called for Michigan to join other states in allowing self-driving vehicle research on the state's roads. Michigan Senate Bill 169 was introduced on February 7, 2013. Michigan's proposed bill allows for the testing of automated vehicles on the state's roads provided there is a human operator in the vehicle to monitor performance, and if necessary, intervene. The Michigan legislation also exempts the vehicle manufacturer from civil liability for damages resulting from the conversion of the vehicle into an automated vehicle by another company or product. Florida's law also similarly exempts vehicle manufactures from liability. In contrast, the laws in California and Nevada are silent as to vehicle manufacturer liability. In creating the future of the vehicle industry, automakers and suppliers need to be aware of how these laws will affect their liability in the future.

A copy of Michigan Senate Bill 169 can be found at http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2013-2014/billintroduced/Senate/pdf/2013-SIB-0169.pdf.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More