United States: Golden Living Case Shows How ‘Worthless Services' Can Be Costly

Last Updated: April 6 2013
Article by Brian T. McGovern

Most Read Contributor in United States, December 2018

With reform of the delivery and financing of health care at the federal and state level under way, quality of care has increasingly become a significant component of reimbursement for providers and managed care plans (e.g., ''pay for performance'' and quality incentive initiatives).

At the same time, quality of care has moved front and center as a compliance concern among regulatory and law enforcement authorities. As of March 23, all nursing homes participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs must have adopted and implemented a comprehensive ethics and compliance program that covers, among other issues, quality of care.

In December 2012, GGNSC Holdings LLC and six of its affiliated nursing homes (Golden Living) entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General and agreed to pay $613,300 to settle a federal and state False Claims Act action brought by the Department of Justice and the state of Georgia.

The settlement resolved the FCA claims based on allegations that two of the nursing facilities had provided inadequate and ''worthless'' wound care to its residents. The Golden Living case represents only the latest installment of DOJ's aggressive use of the FCA to pursue ''worthless services'' actions, and is a sober reminder to providers and managed care plans that quality of care— both individual and systemic deficiencies—must be treated as a compliance priority.

The legal, financial, operational, and reputational risks are significant if care deficiencies are not addressed or remediated through the entity's compliance program and become the predicate for a FCA lawsuit and an onerous CIA.


The relator plaintiff, Joseph L. Micca, M.D. (''Relator''), is a former physician and medical director at a Golden Living facility. The Relator filed a qui tam action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, alleging that 17 patients at the nursing facility where he last served, and one other Golden Living facility, between Jan. 1, 2006, and May 31, 2011, received care that was ''grossly deficient and not of a quality which meets professionally recognized standards of care.'' See Amended Complaint.

To support the contention that Golden Living's services were ''worthless,'' the Relator claimed the following alleged deficiencies:

  • failure of staff to administer ordered medications;
  • failure to perform transfers in compliance with the physician's orders;
  • failure to perform proper wound care;
  • failure to monitor and prevent further deterioration of wounds;
  • inadequate record keeping by nursing staff to allow for proper patient care;
  • failure to provide adequate staffing to sub-acute patients; and
  • backdating and falsification of medical records.

Relator further claimed that he had reported many of these deficiencies to Golden Living management and that management did not act to correct the deficiencies. He also claimed that he was improperly terminated in retaliation for his reporting of the deficiencies.

The Relator's Complaint refers generally to ''systemic'' and ''widespread'' care deficiencies at the two facilities. Notably, the Complaint did not indicate whether at any point during the over five-year span alleged in the Complaint, the Relator reported the alleged incidents of substandard care or resident harm to state or federal health care regulators.

Nor is there any mention of whether any of the annual facility surveys performed by Georgia or federal surveyors during that time frame had cited deficiencies of the kind described in the Complaint.

The U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia intervened in support of the Relator's action on Dec. 31, 2012.


Shortly after the government intervened, the parties settled the FCA claims in the Complaint. Notably, under the terms of the settlement agreement, Golden Living did not admit liability.

In its press release, Golden Living stated that it had ''agreed to the settlement not to dignify [the] baseless charges, but because [it] would rather spend the money on [its] patient care and staff than on legal fees necessary each month to respond to the government's actions in the investigation.''

Golden Living emphasized that one of the facilities in question received a Four-Star Overall rating (out of Five stars) by CMS and a Five-Star Quality rating in the most recent Quality Ratings, while the other facility received a Three-Star Overall rating and a Four-Star Quality rating.1

That the government pursued this matter despite such positive ratings further demonstrates its apparent commitment to aggressively pursuing ''worthless service'' FCA matters involving nursing homes.

Indeed, the U.S. attorney's office press release made clear that ''[q]uality of care in nursing homes is a top priority for the Office of Inspector General . . . [and] [h]ealth care providers need to know that if they provide worthless services to those most in need, they will pay the price.''

Golden Living CIA

The CIA entered into by Golden Living applies to six of its nursing facilities (the ''Applicable Facilities'') in Georgia, and remains in effect for five years. Pursuant to the CIA, these facilities are required to maintain or implement several compliance measures, some of which relate directly to patient care and nursing home operations, including:

  1. Maintaining a Chief Compliance Officer and Related Waiver of Privilege: Notably, the Applicable Facilities agreed not to assert a privilege to OIG with respect to legal advice they obtain from the Chief Compliance Officer after entering into the CIA and during the term of the CIA regarding compliance with the CIA or Federal health care program requirements.
  2. Maintaining a Compliance Committee: The Compliance Committee must conduct internal audits that include adoption of a quality of care ''dashboard'' and review of quality data, performance metrics, and quality tracking.
  3. Limiting use of part-time or contract staff: The CIA requires the Applicable Facilities to ensure sufficient nursing staff levels while minimizing the number of temporary or contract staff, and to track the hours of employee staff versus non-employee caregivers.
  4. Improving patient care: The Applicable Facilities must implement supervised resident-turning schedules (to prevent bedsores or pressure ulcers), with turning occurring at least once every two hours. Staff also must take color photographs of all advanced pressure ulcers immediately upon discovery and take weekly follow-up photos thereafter. The Applicable Facilities must hire or contract with a clinical services consultant certified by the Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing Certification Board.
  5. Mandatory Staff Training: In addition to wound care training, affected staff members also must undergo 10 hours of training regarding proper care, CIA obligations, and the legal sanctions for failure to comply with the standard of care.
  6. Paying for the OIG-appointed Independent Monitor: The OIG will appoint an independent monitor, compensated by the Applicable Facilities, to audit internal quality control, evaluate effectiveness of patient-care policies and procedures, and assess compliance with staffing requirements. The monitor will have immediate access to all residents and staff.


A ''worthless services claim'' brought under the False Claims Act is based on the proposition that ''the performance of the service is so deficient that for all practical purposes it is the equivalent of no performance at all.'' Mike v. Strauss, 274 F.3d 687, 703 (2d Cir. 2001). In particular, it ''is effectively derivative of an allegation that a claim is factually false because it seeks reimbursement for a service not provided.'' Id. One of the first successful prosecutions dates back to 2000, involving Vencor Inc. (''Vencor''), one of the nation's largest operators of nursing homes and hospitals at the time.

Vencor settled with the U.S. attorney's office and entered into a CIA with the OIG in the face of particularized allegations of widespread lack of patient care and allegations of fraud, involving numerous Vendor facilities across the country.

By contrast, the Relator's Complaint against Golden Living includes only generalized allegations of ''widespread'' or ''systemic'' care and compliance problems, none of which in any event apply to any Golden Living facilities other than the two Atlanta-based facilities.

In light of these differences, the aggressive approach taken by the OIG and DOJ against Golden Living may signal a greater willingness to prosecute FCA actions and impose a CIA—with its attendant reporting, oversight, and other (costly) burdens—predicated on a more limited record of individual quality lapses.

Such willingness may especially exist in matters involving the quality of care in nursing homes, a top priority for the HHS Office of Inspector General as the press release cited above emphasizes.

Take Aways

As just noted, quality of care is a high priority for government regulators and prosecutors. As the Golden Living case illustrates, providers and managed care plans must have robust compliance programs that address quality of care and specifically promote timely reporting of care deficiencies, thorough investigation and remediation of any identified problems, follow up, and inservice training.

Existing quality improvement committees and initiatives should be integrated into the corporate compliance infrastructure, to ensure that quality concerns are addressed as a compliance priority at the management and board level.

If a broader problem, such as bedsores, is identified, providers need to develop a plan for corrective action that includes proactive measuring and monitoring the condition systemwide.

Equally important, providers must document all steps taken in the compliance process, to help mitigate the risks, should the day come, when they have to defend a false claims action as in the Golden Living case.

Originally published in BNA's Health Care Fraud Report


1 On January 31, 2013, CMS selected five Golden Living facilities in California, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin (these facilities were not defendants and are not subject to the CIA) among 160 nationwide to participate in its Bundled Payment Demonstration. See http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/Bundled-Payments/Participating-Health-Care-Facilities/index.html.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions