United States: Drowning In Debt - A look At Recent Debt Restructuring In The Tribal Gaming Industry

Native American gaming was once thought of as an industry almost impervious to the gyrations of the broader domestic economy. In fact, it steadily tallied strong results in the years preceding the economic downturn and soaked up its share of the readily available financing that flooded the domestic gaming space as a whole during this period. Between 1995 and 2008, tribal gaming revenues grew almost fivefold from $5.46 billion to $26.7 billion. However, as the domestic economy retrenched in 2008, many tribal casinos saw their previously meteoric growth taper off and began to reel under the strain of outsized leverage incurred in anticipation of ever-increasing earnings.

This change in fortunes led to a number of restructurings that presented tribes and creditors alike with difficult, often novel questions about how to restructure debt in an industry subject to legal and regulatory requirements unlike those in place in the broader domestic gaming space. A real measure of anxiety existed among deal participants facing an uncertain path through territory not yet fully charted.

With restructurings recently completed by the Odawa Casino Resort in Michigan, the Inn of the Mountain Gods Resort and Casino in New Mexico, the Buffalo Thunder Resort and Casino in New Mexico, the River Rock Casino in California, Mohegan Sun in Connecticut and several other tribal gaming enterprises, it is a fitting time to take stock of the key regulatory and legal drivers at play in these restructurings and survey other prominent features and trends in these transactions.

The Regulatory and Legal Landscape

In addition to the core business considerations at the basis of all restructurings, restructurings of tribal enterprises are subject to special regulatory and legal constraints. For example, under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, a tribe must have the “sole proprietary interest and responsibility for the conduct of any gaming activity.” Accordingly, unlike in corporate restructurings, creditors of a tribal gaming enterprise cannot convert their debt into equity. Nor can creditors unilaterally install themselves or their designees as managers of an Indian casino resort.

Moreover, there are important limitations on what collateral tribes can grant their lenders without obtaining federal approval, including, for example, limitations on the ability of a tribe to encumber its land.

Furthermore, under settled federal case law, Indian tribes and their agencies are accorded sovereign immunity, a legal principle which can prevent creditors from exercising remedies against tribes and can prevent tribes from being made subject to the jurisdiction of federal and state courts. As a result, it is common for creditors to obtain a waiver of sovereign immunity in the debt documentation governing tribal financing transactions. Nevertheless, recent successful judicial challenges to these waivers initiated by tribes illustrate the possibility that they may not always be given their expected effect and can even be invalidated altogether.

The Bankruptcy Option

The bankruptcy option, another prominent feature in many corporate restructurings, has not proven to be particularly relevant to tribal restructurings. Legal commentators have offered thoughtful arguments suggesting that tribal entities should be precluded by the operation of certain provisions of the Bankruptcy Code from being debtors eligible to file for bankruptcy protection and that, even if they did become debtors in a bankruptcy case, there would be considerable obstacles to undertaking a customary Chapter 11 restructuring of a tribal entity. It is therefore unsurprising that filings by tribal entities are with limited precedent.

One recent and important bankruptcy case involving a tribal entity was filed in 2012 by the Santa Ysabel Resort and Casino, which is owned by the Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel. In that case, creditors of the Santa Ysabel Resort and Casino raised the jurisdictional questions noted above and succeeded in having the Santa Ysabel Resort and Casino’s bankruptcy case dismissed, generally confirming the view advanced by legal commentators that tribal entities should be precluded from being debtors eligible to file for bankruptcy protection. The Bankruptcy Court did, however, rest its determination in part on the particular attributes of the entity in question, so the decision was not quite as sweeping of a statement as it might have been. Ultimately, however, the lesson to be drawn from experience to date is that the U.S. bankruptcy process very rarely figures in tribal restructurings.

Effect of Regulatory and Legal Considerations on Tribal Restructurings

Taken together, the regulatory and legal features described above particular to tribal gaming entities have had a significant effect on the manner in which tribal restructurings are undertaken. Generally, these regulatory and legal features preclude or limit the use of several common weapons of influence in the creditor arsenal that are routinely brought to bear in corporate restructurings. Consequently, restructurings of the debt of tribal gaming enterprises tend to take on a more consensual and collaborative quality. After all, if the IGRA does not permit creditors to own or operate Indian gaming enterprises and foreclosing on the limited collateral which creditors may enjoy is unlikely to yield sufficient proceeds to retire their debt (but is quite likely to cause gaming operations to shut down and no longer be able to produce any revenue to service that debt), creditors have every reason to pursue a settlement that safeguards a tribal entity’s ability to pay down debt.

The tribes do not hold a monopoly on negotiating leverage, though. Tribes, which have benefited from their ability to access the capital markets in the past in order to build their gaming businesses, seem reticent to be so aggressive in negotiation as to cause lenders to consider pulling back generally from investing in the space. In addition, many gaming tribes are dependent on distributions from their casino operations to fund basic public services for their members, which gives tribes so situated a powerful incentive—similar to that of creditors—to negotiate in earnest to achieve a mutually acceptable restructuring arrangement with their creditors in order to keep their gaming assets operating and producing earnings. A scorched earth approach tends not to serve either side’s interests.

Additionally, with creditors reluctant to test waivers of sovereign immunity and tribes and creditors alike thus far generally disinclined to seek the involvement of bankruptcy courts or contend with possible associated jurisdictional questions, there is frequently no third party neutral on the scene to serve as an umpire to settle the tough questions the parties may not be able to resolve on their own. As a result, the tribal parties and their creditors must themselves work through each negotiating impasse that they reach.

It is therefore not terribly surprising that a number of tribal restructurings have been rather protracted affairs, with some taking years to complete. For example, Foxwoods Resort Casino, run by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe, went into default in late 2009 and began negotiating a debt restructuring in early 2010. Over two and a half years later, in August 2012, Foxwoods announced that it had reached an agreement with steering committees of its lenders and bondholders to restructure its debt and would “work toward building support for the agreement and implementing the restructuring,” although few particulars of the transaction were provided and, and as of the date of this writing, Foxwoods has not announced that the transaction has closed.

Notable Recent

Restructurings in the Space

While the Foxwoods restructuring has meandered along over the past few years and has not yet closed, a number of other high-profile restructurings of the debt of tribal gaming enterprises have been completed, including transactions involving the Odawa Casino Resort of the Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians in Michigan (Q3 2010), the Inn of the Mountain Gods Resort and Casino of the Mescalero Apache Tribe in New Mexico (Q1 2011), the Buffalo Thunder Resort and Casino of the Pojoaque Pueblo in New Mexico (Q1 2011), the River Rock Casino of the Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians in California (Q4 2011) and Mohegan Sun of the Mohegan Tribe in Connecticut (Q2 2012). These transactions often involved a cash payment of some kind at closing to participating creditors and were effected principally through exchange offers in which existing bonds issued by the relevant tribal gaming enterprise were exchanged for new bonds issued by it.

These recently completed restructurings of tribal gaming enterprises exemplify many of the key regulatory and legal lessons outlined above. None of these restructurings resulted in the transfer of any ownership interest in the relevant casino enterprise to any creditors, nor did any result in creditors assuming management control of casino operations. In addition, each of these restructurings involved the issuance of new debt by a tribal gaming enterprise, but none of that debt was secured by tribal lands. Moreover, none of these restructurings was effectuated through a bankruptcy case.

Looking through the regulatory and legal prism yields valuable insights about these restructurings, but other important considerations—including some not peculiar to Indian gaming—were also at play. It is worth noting, for example, that these recently completed restructurings generally fall into one of two categories: (i) “Deeply distressed” restructurings, in which the relevant gaming enterprise faced extraordinary financial and operational headwinds; and (ii) “liability management” restructurings, in which the relevant gaming enterprise sought to extend the maturity of its debt and obtain other related relief in an effort to stabilize its balance sheet, but did not necessarily face immediate and acute pressure on its financial results.

Predictably, the deeply distressed deals generally resulted in creditors accepting deeper reductions in the face amount of, or interest rates on, the debt they held than the liability management transactions, in which the issuers generally had the ability based on their earnings to service higher levels of debt at higher rates of interest.

Distinct Nature of Tribal Gaming Restructurings

Like the balance of the domestic gaming industry, the tribal gaming space experienced setbacks during the economic downturn and witnessed its share of restructurings. However, the highly regulated environment in which tribal gaming restructurings are undertaken means that they are subject to special constraints making them distinct from traditional corporate restructurings in several important respects.

This occurs especially as a result of the limited application of bankruptcy law to these transactions as well as limitations on creditors taking ownership interests in, or exercising management control over, tribal gaming enterprises in these restructurings. In spite of the thorny legal backdrop, with several significant restructurings in the industry recently completed, tribes and creditors alike have demonstrated that the attendant challenges can be successfully navigated.

Previously published in Global Gaming Business, March 2013.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions