United States: Preliminary Answers From EPA On The Viability Of The PM 2.5 Significant Impact Level

Last Updated: March 18 2013
Article by Todd E. Palmer and Anna J. Wildeman

On March 4, 2013, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a Question and Answer (QA) document addressing how the agency intends to deal with the January 22, 2013 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit which vacated portions of the PM2.5 implementation rule concerning the use of significant impact levels (SIL) and significant monitoring concentrations (SMC). See Sierra Club v. EPA, No. 10-1413 (D.C. Cir. 1/22/13). EPA also stated its intent to issue guidance on how to conduct air quality analyses to support Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permits and initiate a proposed rulemaking action to address the vacatur.

The January 22, 2013 vacatur created significant uncertainty in the regulated community, and the QA document represents EPA's first published guidance document on the topic addressed to permitting authorities. As the QA document notes, the vacatur does not become effective until seven days after the last day for filing a request for rehearing (approximately March 15, 2013) and although the QA document states the federal government has not yet decided whether to seek a rehearing, EPA urges permitting authorities to immediately comply with the court's decision.

The QA document provides answers to some very important questions, however it still leaves much uncertainty, especially for those permit applications currently pending review.

Background

Pursuant to its authority under the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and welfare. 42 U.S.C. § 7409(b). A source subject to the PSD permitting program must demonstrate that emissions from its construction or operation "will not cause, or contribute to" air pollution in excess of any established NAAQS or any promulgated maximum allowable increase in ambient pollutant concentrations above an existing baseline concentration – this is called an "increment." An increment is determined based on geography. Sources in areas designated as Class I, Class II and Class II areas will be subject to different increments. Pursuant to CAA §165 (42 U.S.C. § 7475), a proposed source must make this demonstration by collecting pre-construction ambient air monitoring data.

By the 2010 rule, EPA amended PM2.5 requirements under the PSD program to include a PM2.5 increment and two screening tools – the SIL and SMC – to help determine if a facility's construction or operation will exceed the PM2.5 NAAQS or increment. The SIL was promulgated to determine if emissions from a modification would be de minimis, such that a full facility impact analysis would not be required. The SMC was similarly promulgated to determine if a source's impact or the existing PM2.5 ambient concentrations are de minimis, such that pre-construction monitoring would not be required.

Although the 2010 rule promulgated these screening tools specifically for PM2.5, EPA has used these tools since 1980 to limit the number of sources required to conduct in-depth analyses and pre-construction monitoring for other pollutants. Regardless of EPA's long history utilizing these tools, the Court found the relevant statutory language was clear and that EPA exceeded its authority when it created these tools in the context of the 2010 PM2.5 rule.

The Court's Decision

As noted above, the Court vacated and remanded the portions of the PM2.5 rule which permit SILs and SMCs to determine if a source's emissions are de minimis and require no further investigation or analysis. The effect of a vacatur is that the vacated portions of the rule effectively disappear, as if they were never promulgated. However, and most importantly, the Court's decision was limited to the use of the PM2.5 SILs and SMCs that were created in the 2010 rule. The Court specifically declined to address Sierra Club's question of whether EPA generally has authority to promulgate SILs because,

"[t]o do so would require that we answer a question not prudentially ripe for determination. On remand, the EPA may promulgate regulations that do not include SILs or that do include SILs that do not allow the construction or modification of a source to evade the requirements of the [CAA] as do the SILs in the current rule. In such an event, we would not need to address the universal allowance of all de minimis authority."

Sierra Club v. EPA, at 11.

The QA Document

EPA's March 4, 2013 QA document appears to pick up on the Court's holding and provides states with interim directives for implementing the PM2.5 PSD program. In brief summary, the QA document clarifies that states have the ability to continue using PM2.5 SILs in PSD permitting, but must do so with caution and a full explanation of the justifications for doing so. On this point, the most critical portions of the QA document provide as follows:

May the PM2.5 SILs be used to complete the required PM2.5 air quality analysis in light of the court's decision?

  • The EPA does not interpret the Court's decision to preclude the use of SILs for PM2.5 entirely but additional care should be taken by permitting authorities in how they apply those SILs so that the permitting record supports a conclusion that the source will not cause or contribute to a violation of the PM2.5 NAAQS
  • PSD permitting authorities have the discretion to select PM2.5 SIL values if the permitting record provides sufficient justification for the SIL values that are used and the manner in which they are used to support a permitting decision.
  • The PM2.5 SIL values in the EPA's regulations may continue to be used in some circumstances if permitting authorities take care to consider background concentrations prior to using these SIL values in particular ways.
  • As part of a cumulative analysis, the applicant may continue to show that the proposed source does not contribute to an existing violation of the PM2.5 NAAQS by demonstrating that the proposed source's PM2.5 impact does not significantly contribute to an existing violation of the PM2.5 NAAQS. However, permitting authorities should consult with the EPA before using any of the SIL values in the EPA's regulations for this purpose (including the PM2.5 SIL value in section 51.165(b)(2), which was not vacated by the Court).

How does the Court's decision on PM2.5 SILs and SMC affect permits already issued?

  • The EPA believes that sources with final PSD permits are not likely to be affected by the Court's decision, since they were issued in accordance with the rules in effect at that time.

Impact on Wisconsin

It is currently unclear what impact this decision will have on sources in Wisconsin, especially those sources that are midway through a PSD permitting process and have relied on SILs for PM2.5.

There are a number of factors that will go into the Wisconsin-specific implementation of the Sierra Club v. EPA decision. For example, there may be a legal argument that the Sierra Club v. EPA decision cannot be applied to Wisconsin's air program because of our state-specific regulatory language. Moreover, recall that WDNR issued a detailed guidance document in April 2011 which outlines when a source must conduct detailed modeling and when such modeling is not required. Based on this WDNR guidance (before this decision was issued), a Wisconsin source would be required to model only a proposed new piece of equipment and, if it's emissions modeled below the SIL, no additional modeling would be required; however now, there may be questions raised as to whether the WDNR's guidance is still applicable.

Sources who are considering submitting an air permit application or who are midway through the permitting process should carefully consider the optional paths for moving forward to ensure that new investment dollars are not sacrificed because of this regulatory development.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
BakerHostetler
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
BakerHostetler
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions