United States: When "Loan To Own" Becomes "Own A Loan" – How A Recent Fifth Circuit Decision Rejecting The Artificial Impairment Doctrine Increases Risks For Distressed Real Estate Investors

Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code provides debtors with a number of tools to restructure comprehensively their debts and other liabilities as well as immediate protection from secured and unsecured creditors. In single asset real estate ("SARE") cases, secured lenders (i.e., mortgage holders) typically have greater protections against aggressive equity owners seeking to use chapter 11 to deprive lenders of their contractual and state law remedies, including foreclosure. However, the Fifth Circuit's recent decision in Western Real Estate Equities, L.L.C. v. Village at Camp Bowie I, L.P. (Matter of Village at Camp Bowie I, L.P.), No. 12-10271 (5th Cir. Feb. 26, 2013) may have turned the tables on these dynamics in favor of distressed property owners, and secured lenders may now have to consider alternative strategies to counter this changed dynamic. Otherwise, distressed investors could end up being forced by bankruptcy courts to continue lending substantial sums of money to SARE debtors on a long-term basis and on below-market terms.

Background

The debtor in Camp Bowie owned a mixed-use development in Fort Worth, Texas and filed for chapter 11 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas the night before the foreclosure sale initiated by the debtor's secured mortgage lender, Western Real Estate Equities, L.L.C. ("Western"), who had acquired the loan from Wells Fargo at a significant discount. As of the filing, the debtor owed approximately $32 million to Western on the mortgage as well as a total of $60,000 to 38 different general unsecured creditors. Early in the case, Western sought relief from the automatic stay to foreclose on the property. The bankruptcy court denied Western's motion, finding that Western was oversecured (i.e., the value of the property exceeded the outstanding mortgage debt).

The debtor proposed a non-consensual "cramdown" chapter 11 plan that sought to force Western to accept a new five-year note with a 5.83% interest rate and a balloon payment to be made upon the new note's maturity. Under the plan, the debtor's general unsecured creditors would be paid in full, but over a three month period, without interest, and the existing equity owners would retain the property. Western objected to confirmation on a number of grounds, arguing, among other things, that the plan's de minimis impairment of general unsecured creditors constituted "artificial impairment" and, therefore, precluded the debtor from satisfying the requirement in Bankruptcy Code section 1129(a)(10) that at least one impaired class of creditors vote to accept a "cramdown" plan. Western also argued that the debtor's contrived scheme to manufacture a minimally impaired class of creditors with comparatively little economic exposure to the debtor demonstrated that the plan was not proposed "in good faith" as required by Bankruptcy Code section 1129(a)(3).

The Bankruptcy Court and Fifth Circuit's Decisions

The Bankruptcy Court rejected Western's arguments and confirmed the plan. Specifically, the bankruptcy court rejected the doctrine of "artificial impairment," holding that the Bankruptcy Code's definition of impairment in Bankruptcy Code section 1124 is both clear and intentionally broad and makes no distinction between various degrees of impairment. In other words, impairment is impairment, whether or not material or driven by economic need. The bankruptcy court acknowledged, however, that it would be appropriate to consider whether the debtor's "artificial" impairment of unsecured creditors' claims under the plan means that the plan was not proposed in good faith. Ultimately, the bankruptcy court found that the plan was proposed in good faith because the debtor's equity owners were merely acting to reorganize the debtor's balance sheet in a manner that would also preserve their in-the-money equity interests in the property against an attempt by Western to appropriate that value for itself. Western appealed the bankruptcy court's decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed the bankruptcy court's decision and order confirming the debtor's plan. In so doing, the Fifth Circuit followed the Ninth Circuit's decision in In re L&J Anaheim Associates, which held that any impairment of a class of claims, no matter how economically insignificant, can be used by the debtor to meet the confirmation requirement of an impaired accepting class (subject to passing muster under the Code's good faith requirement). In its decision, the Fifth Circuit also rejected the Eighth Circuit's decision in In re Windsor on the River Associates, which, to date, is the only Circuit Court of Appeals to have held that the impaired accepting class requirement cannot be satisfied by nominally impairing a class of claims under a plan for the central purpose of satisfying that very requirement.

What Camp Bowie Means For Distressed Real Estate Investors Pursuing "Loan-to-Own" Strategies

In the wake of Camp Bowie, it is still possible for secured lenders facing the prospect of an unfavorable cramdown plan to defeat confirmation by asserting that the plan was not proposed in "good faith." After all, the Fifth Circuit did not independently decide that the debtor's plan in Camp Bowie was proposed in good faith, but rather held that the bankruptcy court did not clearly err in making its fact-specific finding of good faith. Nonetheless, the contours of the "good faith" requirement may vary from case to case and are insufficiently defined to provide distressed investors with the degree of clarity and predictability needed to make fully informed investment decisions. What is more, the limited guidance provided by the Fifth Circuit in Camp Bowie on the good faith issue suggests that artificial impairment, without more, could rarely, if ever, suffice to show that a plan was proposed in bad faith.

Previously, opportunistic real estate investors could purchase a SARE debtor's distressed mortgage debt at a deep discount and have a reasonable expectation that they would either end up owning the property through a bankruptcy (or through a state law foreclosure) or receive consideration for their debt that would substantially exceed the amount paid to acquire the debt. The Camp Bowie decision represents a significant shift in negotiating leverage that favors existing fee owners of distressed real estate and disfavors holders of secured mortgage debt. Accordingly, in light of Camp Bowie, real estate investors seeking to purchase mortgage debt as part of a "loan-to-own" strategy will undoubtedly want to exercise more caution before making a particular investment, particularly in mortgage debt issued by borrowers located in states in the Fifth and Ninth Circuits (e.g., Texas and California).

For starters, investors will want to be even more vigilant in their pre-investment diligence and valuation analysis to ensure that the mortgage debt is comfortably "underwater," and continue analyzing the value of the collateral throughout the case. In cases where the market value of property is less than the amount of outstanding mortgage debt—secured lenders will often have a sizeable unsecured "deficiency" claim that will control the voting outcome of the unsecured class, thereby avoiding a situation where a SARE debtor can propose a plan that nominally (or even substantially) impairs an economically insignificant class of trade creditors to force the secured lenders to essentially refinance a debtor's mortgage on non-market terms.

Second, investors will want to develop a strategy to neutralize the debtor's ability to confirm a "cramdown" plan by nominally impairing a class of creditors if the debtor succeeds in demonstrating that there is equity value in the property over and above the mortgage debt. One possible strategy might involve purchasing a sufficient number of unsecured "trade" claims to allow the investor to vote claims comprising more than one-third of the total claims pool (i.e., a blocking position) against the plan. For example, in Camp Bowie, if Western had acquired over $20,000 of the approximately $60,000 of unsecured trade claims against the debtor and voted those claims against the plan, it likely would have prevented the debtor from reaching the threshold needed to have an impaired accepting class. That amount would have been a very small price for Western to pay to avoid being forced to extend a $32 million loan for another five years on economic terms unavailable to most borrowers on the open market. Such a strategy is not foolproof, however. As an initial matter, there is no guarantee that a debtor's trade creditors will be willing to sell. In fact, these trade creditors may actively resist such overtures, preferring to have no recovery on account of their claims if it means preserving their business relationship with the SARE debtor (and perhaps other properties owned by the same entity as the debtor) post-bankruptcy. Even if a secured lender successfully purchases more than one-third of the unsecured claims pool, there is also a risk that the debtor may seek to "designate" (or have the bankruptcy court disregard) the secured lender's votes to reject the plan on account of the acquired claims pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 1126(e). Although, case law suggests that the debtor would be unlikely to succeed in its effort to designate those votes, it is still a risk to consider before investing in the mortgage debt of a distressed borrower that could be oversecured.

Investors will also want to consider in advance what types of litigation tactics they might employ in a bankruptcy case to gain leverage vis-à-vis aggressive property owners, such as moving to dismiss the chapter 11 on the ground that it was filed in bad faith.

www.ropesgray.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Stites & Harbison PLLC
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Stites & Harbison PLLC
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions