United States: Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest - March 1, 2013

Last Updated: March 10 2013

Edited by Robert Weiss and Gregory Xethalis


SEC/CORPORATE

Recent SEC Speeches Focus on Investor Protection and Disclosure

Members of the Securities and Exchange Commission have recently given several speeches in which they expressed their views (sometimes inconsistent) as to investor protection and disclosure to investors in SEC filings.

Investor Protection

In a February 22 speech at The SEC Speaks in 2013, SEC Chairman Elisse Walter discussed investor protection. She stressed that regulation minimizing risks both to the larger financial system and to investors is necessary, but also noted that all investment involves risk inherent to the business in which the investment is made. Ms. Walter remarked that the SEC should work to give investors access to information and protect them from unnecessary risks such as fraud, market manipulation, insider trading and market structure failures, but should not discourage all risk-taking, in order to allow for continued growth in public offerings.

Click here to read the full text of the speech.

Disclosure to Investors

In a February 22 speech at The SEC Speaks in 2013, SEC Commissioner Troy A. Paredes discussed the philosophy behind disclosure regulation. He focused on the importance of disclosure and transparency in SEC filings in order to allow investors to appropriately evaluate the performance of companies and incentivize directors and officers to run businesses in a way that is beneficial to investors. However, he expressed concern that the increasing quantity of complex disclosure in SEC filings may result in "information overload," which could cause investors to be unable to separate valuable information from information that is less useful. He suggested that shorter SEC filings with simpler presentation of information could be more useful to investors, and that it may be beneficial to allow some current disclosures to be more narrowly focused, scaled back or excluded and to limit the expansion of disclosure requirements so that companies are not required to include information that is not material to evaluating their businesses.

Click here to read the full text of the speech.

In a February 20 speech, SEC Commissioner Luis A. Aguilar encouraged companies to provide better and more comprehensive disclosure in their proxy statements. He focused primarily on disclosure provisions added or enhanced by the 2009 amendments to Regulation S-K. He suggested that companies include thoughtful and specific disclosure on items such as compensation policies and practices relating to risk management, the relationship between compensation and the company's long-term performance, the board's role in risk oversight and the effect of that on board leadership, and board nominating policies relating to diversity. He also expressed support for enhanced disclosure relating to political spending by companies, which some companies already provide voluntarily, and noted that a rulemaking petition was filed with the SEC seeking rules requiring such disclosure.

Click here to read the full text of the speech.

BROKER DEALER

SEC 2013 Examination Priorities

The Securities and Exchange Commission's National Examination Program (NEP) published its examination priorities for 2013. The examination priorities address market-wide issues as well as issues with respect to the following program areas: (i) investment advisers and investment companies, (ii) broker-dealers, (iii) market oversight and (iv) clearing and transfer agents.

The NEP identified the following as the most significant market-wide examination priorities:

  • Identifying market participants engaged in fraudulent or unethical behavior;
  • Understanding firms' approaches to enterprise risk management and how they govern and manage financial, legal, compliance, operational and reputational risks;
  • Looking at overall risk governance frameworks regarding the management of conflicts of interest and the sufficiency of disclosures made to investors regarding conflicts of interest; and
  • Conducting examinations on supervision of information technology systems with respect to operational capability, market access, information security, risks of system outages and data integrity compromises.

Click here for an outline of the focus of the Investment Adviser-Investment Company Exam Program, the Broker-Dealer Exam Program, the Market Oversight Exam Program and the Clearance and Settlement Exam Program.

Click here for the 2013 Examination Priorities

CFTC

CFTC Revises Clearing Compliance Schedule for iTraxx CDS Indices

The Division of Clearing and Risk of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has deferred for approximately six weeks the deadline for mandatory clearing of iTraxx Credit Default Swap (iTraxx CDS) indices. Swap dealers, security-based swap dealers, major swap participants, major security-based swap participants and active funds (Category 1 Entities) must comply with the clearing requirements for such iTraxx swaps by April 26, 2013. Commodity pools, private funds (other than active funds) and certain other persons primarily engaged in banking or financial activities (Category 2 Entities) must comply by July 25, 2013. All other entities (Category 3 Entities) must comply by October 23, 2013. The previously established schedule for all other swaps subject to the clearing requirement (CDX CDS indices and all four classes of interest rate swaps) remains unchanged: Category 1 Entities-March 11, 2013; Category 2 Entities-June 10, 2013; and Category 3 Entities-September 9, 2013.

More information is available here.

INVESTMENT COMPANIES AND INVESTMENT ADVISERS

SEC Division of Trading and Markets Discusses Issues with Exchange-Traded Products

In a February 22 speech at The SEC Speaks in 2013, Associate Director of the Division of Trading and Markets of the Securities and Exchange Commission Heather Seidel discussed the evolution of exchange-traded products (ETPs) as seen from the perspective of her office's review of stock exchange applications for ETP listing rules under Rule 19b-4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Ms. Seidel has seen an increase in ETP listing rule applications over the last year with significant growth in rules sought for actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs), including such ETFs utilizing fixed income securities. She also noted an increased level of complexity of ETPs that seek inverse and leveraged performance of various asset classes as well as of exchange-traded notes (ETNs).

In ETP listing rule applications, Ms. Seidel stated that the Division staff were seeking clarity as to what the ETP is, its structure, investment objective and compliance with listing standards. For ETPs that are not investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, Ms. Seidel noted that the staff is particularly concerned with the transparency of what the ETP is tracking, the transparency of its investment objective and how the arbitrage mechanism, which reduces premiums or discounts of ETP share trading prices against the ETP's net asset value, will work for the ETP.

LITIGATION

Supreme Court Ruling Lowers Class Action Hurdle for Securities Fraud Cases

On February 27, the Supreme Court upheld a lower court's determination that proof of materiality is not required before certifying a securities fraud class action.

Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds sought class certification against Amgen Inc. alleging that Amgen made material misrepresentations about two of its flagship drugs, subsequently affecting Amgen's stock price. Amgen asserted that materiality must be proven before certifying the class under Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires common questions of law or fact to predominate in class actions.

By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court held that challenges to materiality were not appropriate at the class certification stage. Justice Ginsberg, writing the opinion for the Court, noted: "Rule 23 grants courts no license to engage in free-ranging merits inquiries at the certification stage." Rather, the initial stages of a class action are designed to select the best method to litigate fairly and efficiently and Amgen's position would "put the cart before the horse." According to the Court, the "pivotal inquiry is whether proof of materiality is needed to ensure that the questions of law or fact common to the class will "predominate over any questions affecting only individual members' as the litigation progresses." The Court reasoned that because materiality is judged according to an objective standard, it can be proven through evidence common to the class. In dissent, Justice Thomas criticized the majority for "all but eliminating materiality as one of the predicates of the fraud-on-the market theory...."

Amgen, Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, No. 11-1085 (2012).

Split Emerges on Customs Law after Eleventh Circuit Vacates Smuggling Convictions

On February 22, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that an indictment charging the unlawful importation of goods into the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 545 and 371, failed to state an offense because the unlawful act was based on a Federal Drug Administration (FDA) regulation as opposed to a congressional statute. The court therefore vacated all convictions and sentences. In doing so, the court set up a circuit split regarding the interpretation of what law must be violated for importation to be "contrary to law" under 18 U.S.C. § 545.

Appellants, the founders and officers of Naver Trading, Corp., were convicted of one count of conspiring to unlawfully import foods and six counts of smuggling goods into the United States relating to their importation of food into the United States in violation of FDA regulations. On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit sua sponte raised the question of whether the unlawful importation charge in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 525 sufficiently alleged a crime.

The court found that the US government prosecuted appellants for FDA violations that gave rise to civil remedies but did not reference any criminal statute or specify any criminal punishment. Applying the rule of lenity, the court held that "there is, at a minimum, great doubt as to whether violation of this regulation per se gives rise to criminal liability." In so doing, it expressly disagreed with the conclusion of the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in finding the regulation not "grievously ambiguous."

The Eleventh Circuit also noted that the indictment did not adequately put the appellants on notice as to which statute they were alleged to have violated. As the court observed, "the passing mention of unlawful acts in [the indictment] is obscured by the vast majority of the indictment, which focuses on acts that are not criminal in nature." Accordingly, the court concluded, the "entire indictment did not adequately set forth a violation of criminal law."

U.S. v. Izurieta, No. 11-13585 (11th Cir. Feb. 22, 2013).

BANKING

FinCEN Issues Advisory to Financial Institutions: Update on Tax Refund Fraud and Related Identity Theft

On February 28, and in connection with the start of tax season, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued an advisory to remind financial institutions about tax refund fraud and the required reporting of such activity through the filing of a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR). According to FinCen, "identity theft can be a precursor to tax refund fraud because individual income tax returns filed in the United States are tracked and processed by Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs) and the individual taxpayer names associated with these numbers. Criminals can obtain TINs through various methods of identity theft, including phishing schemes and the establishment of fraudulent tax preparation businesses."

Financial institutions "are critical in identifying tax refund fraud because the methods for tax refund distribution - issuance of paper checks, and direct deposit into demand deposit or prepaid access card accounts - often involve various financial services providers. The number of tax refunds being distributed via direct deposit has increased significantly over the past several years and continues to increase annually."

To see the red flags listed by FinCEN to assist financial institutions to identify potential tax fraud, click here.

If a financial institution "knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect that a transaction conducted or attempted by, at, or through the financial institution involves funds derived from illegal activity or an attempt to disguise funds derived from illegal activity, is designed to evade regulations promulgated under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), or lacks a business or apparent lawful purpose," the financial institution may well be required to file a SAR.

Read more.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND ERISA

New Fees Coming for Health Plan Sponsors

To help offset the costs associated with the implementation of the health care reform legislation, also known as the Patient Protection and Accordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA), the law imposes certain fees on health insurers and sponsors of self-insured health plans.

PCORI FEE

One PPACA fee is intended to fund the Patient Centered Outcome Research Institute (PCORI), a research institute created under PPACA to advance research related to evidence-based medicine. The PCORI fee is effective for each plan year ending after October 1, 2012 and before October 1, 2019. The PCORI fee is $1.00 per covered life for the first plan year for which it is due, $2.00 per covered life for the second plan year for which it is due, and for years three through seven, the PCORI fee is adjusted by each year's health care inflation rate as determined by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The final rules issued on December 6, 2012, contain several methods for determining the number of covered lives under a health plan.

A sponsor of a self-insured health plan is responsible for payment of the PCORI fee. For insured plans, the insurance company is responsible for paying the PCORI (although it is expected that insurers will pass the PCORI fee and the TRP fee (discussed below) on to the employer purchasing the policy). The PCORI fee is due no later than July 31 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the plan year ends. For calendar year plans, the first PCORI fee for the 2012 plan year is due by July 31, 2013. PCORI fees should be submitted to the IRS together with a properly completed IRS Form 720

TRP FEE

A more substantial fee arising under PPACA is expected to be in effect for calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016. The Transitional Reinsurance Program (TRP) was created under PPACA to help stabilize health insurance premiums once the requirements of PPACA become more fully effective in 2014. In addition, PPACA requires that the fee associated with TRP be increased so that the US Treasury receives a total of $5 billion over the three-year period that the TRP fee is expected to be in effect.

The TRP fee is calculated based on the revenue necessary to be collected. Specifically, PPACA provides that the aggregate amount of TRP fees to be collected for 2014 is approximately $12 billion. Accordingly (and based on recently issued proposed rules), the TRP fee per covered life for 2014 is expected to be approximately $5.25 per month (or $63.00 per year). However, the specific amount of the TRP fee for 2014 is not yet finalized.

In any case, the TRP fee is expected to be reduced for 2015 and 2016 because the aggregate fees due to be collected in those years are $8 billion and $5 billion, respectively. However, guidance indicates that the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is considering a leveling mechanism that may reduce the 2014 TRP fee to some degree by raising the TRP fee that would be due in 2015 and 2016. Final guidance from HHS will determine the TRP fee for each year.

The actual TRP fee owed by an insurance company or sponsor of a self-insured health plan is determined based on the number of lives covered by the policy or plan. In each year (2014, 2015 and 2016), insurance companies and sponsors are to report to HHS the number of covered lives by November 15 (the guidance contains several methods for determining this number). HHS is then expected to notify the sponsor or insurer of its TRP fee within 30 days. The fee will then be due 30 days thereafter (i.e., the fee for 2014 will be payable in late December 2014 or early January 2015).

While the guidance related to the TRP fee is not yet final, it is recommended that sponsors and insurers keep both the TRP fee and the PCORI fee in mind when budgeting for health care costs.

The final regulations regarding the PCORI fee can be found here.

The proposed regulations regarding the TRP fee can be found here

UK DEVELOPMENTS

One-Day Prohibition Imposed on Short Selling of Four Italian Shares

On February 27, the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) announced that it had prohibited short selling of the shares of four named Italian financial institutions for the duration of the February 27 trading day. The prohibition applied to all UK trading venues on which the shares are traded. The FSA stated that it had imposed the prohibition to assist the Commissione Nazionale per le Societa e la Borsa (CONSOB), the Italian regulator, following the imposition by CONSOB of a similar one-day short selling ban.

The FSA and CONSOB prohibitions were imposed under emergency powers contained in Article 23 of the EU Short Selling Regulation (EU/236/2012) under which national regulators can impose temporary short selling prohibitions after a significant fall in the price of a financial instrument to prevent a further "disorderly decline" in that instrument's price.

Read more

EU DEVELOPMENTS

EMIR Technical Standards Published in the Official Journal of the European Union

Technical Standards which clarify certain aspects of Regulation 648/2012 on over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, central counterparties (CCPs) and trade repositories (generally known as the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation or EMIR) will enter into force on March 15, 2013, following their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union on February 23.

As reported in Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest of December 21, 2012, the technical standards relate to:

  • Indirect clearing arrangements;
  • The clearing obligation procedure;
  • The public register;
  • Access to a trading venue;
  • Non-financial counterparties;
  • Risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives contracts not cleared by a central counterparty (CCP);
  • The specification of the provisions in legislation that relate to the requirements for CCPs;
  • The capital, retained earnings and reserves of a CCP;
  • The format of the records to be maintained by a CCP;
  • The specification of the provisions in legislation that related to the minimum details of the data to be reported to trade repositories;
  • The details of the application for registration as a trade repository;
  • Data to be published and made available by trade repositories;
  • Operational standards for aggregating, comparing and accessing the data published by trade repositories;
  • The specification of the format and frequency of trade reports to trade repositories; and
  • The format of applications for registration of trade repositories.

Read more.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Video
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.