United States: Bankruptcy Court For The District Of Delaware Approves The Use Of Post-Petition Lock-Up Agreements And Permits Release Of Non-Debtor Parties By Non-Voting Creditors

Last Updated: February 28 2013
Article by Mark E. Felger and Keith L. Kleinman

The Delaware Bankruptcy Court recently issued an opinion in the Indianapolis Downs1 Chapter 11 case that is worth reading in its entirety for its impact on numerous plan confirmation issues. This article will address the court's endorsement of post-petition lock-up agreements and, secondarily, the court's approval of a plan's third-party release provision that provides for the deemed consent of non-voting creditors.

Lock-up agreements are contracts generally negotiated between a debtor (or a prospective debtor) and a creditor in which a creditor promises to vote in favor of a plan of reorganization so long as certain agreed upon terms are included in the plan. Usually, lock-ups are entered into prepetition as part of a prepackaged Chapter 11 reorganization. However, in certain cases, lock-ups are negotiated after a debtor files for bankruptcy but prior to the distribution of an approved disclosure statement or an actual plan.

Plan objectors have argued that these post-petition lock-ups constitute improper "solicitations" for the acceptance of a plan, claiming such agreements are entered into without providing the parties to the agreement with an approved disclosure statement as required by Section 1125(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.2 In 2002, two unreported Delaware Bankruptcy Court rulings issued in the Stations Holding and NII Holdings' bankruptcies agreed and determined that the lock-up agreements in those cases constituted improper solicitations in violation of Section 1125(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.3 Accordingly, in Stations Holding and NII Holdings, the Bankruptcy Court "designated" the locked-up votes under Section 1126(e) of the Bankruptcy Code4 and, thus, did not count them in determining whether to confirm the proposed plan.5

However, in In re Indianapolis Downs, LLC, the Bankruptcy Court declined to follow the rulings issued in Stations Holding and NII Holdings and refused to designate the votes cast in favor of the debtors' plan by parties who had entered into a post-petition agreement requiring them to vote in favor of a conforming plan.6 In so holding, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court has disagreed with the Stations Holding decision, which presented somewhat similar facts, and offered a thoughtful view of the setting in which post-petition plan support agreements would be approved.


Prior to filing for bankruptcy, Indianapolis Downs, LLC (Indianapolis Downs) and Indiana Downs Capital Corp., (Indiana Downs) attempted to negotiate a restructuring agreement with their creditors to resolve the companies' looming financial crises. Unfortunately, these negotiations failed and both Indianapolis Downs and Indiana Downs filed Chapter 11 petitions on April 7, 2011.

After filing for bankruptcy, the debtors7 and the majority of their creditors continued to negotiate over the debtors' restructuring. Following months of negotiations and litigation, the parties reached an agreement and entered into a Restructuring Support Agreement (RSA) that outlined the process by which the debtors would reorganize. The RSA included a "requirement (enforceable by an order of specific performance) that parties to the RSA vote 'yes' for a plan that complies with the RSA."8

On April 25, 2012, the RSA was filed with the Bankruptcy Court along with a plan of reorganization and an accompanying proposed disclosure statement that detailed the RSA. Subsequently, after finding a purchaser for substantially all the debtors' assets (as contemplated by the RSA), the debtors simultaneously requested confirmation of their plan and approval for the sale. However, certain of the debtors' senior management and holders of equity and debt instruments objected to confirmation of the plan. Among other things, the objectors asked the Bankruptcy Court to designate the votes cast in favor of the plan by those who were bound by the RSA, claiming that the RSA "constituted a wrongful post-petition solicitation of votes on a plan prior to Court approval of a disclosure statement."9


At the outset, Judge Shannon declined to follow the orders entered in the Stations Holding and NII Holdings bankruptcy cases, concluding that those cases were distinguishable and "are of only the most limited (if any) precedential value" due to their containing no legal analysis.10 Instead, Judge Shannon decided to follow the reasoning of In re Heritage Org., L.L.C., an opinion that declined to designate the votes of creditors who were subject to a post-petition lock-up agreement because designation of such votes "would not further any bankruptcy policy."11 As Judge Shannon explained, "the right of creditors to vote on a plan is a critical feature of Chapter 11 . . .."12 In the absence of bad faith or wrongful conduct, it would be inconsistent with the purposes of the Bankruptcy Code to "discount or ignore the votes of the overwhelming majority of the creditors and stakeholders, and thereby deny confirmation of a Plan that has been laboriously (and expensively) developed and has won broad support."13 Additionally, "and perhaps more to the point," the disclosure requirements of Section 1125(b) of the Bankruptcy Code were not meant to protect sophisticated financial players such as the parties to the RSA.14 "It would grossly elevate form over substance to contend that § 1125(b) requires designation of their votes because they should have been afforded the chance to review a court-approved disclosure statement prior to making or supporting a deal with the Debtor."15

With these principals in mind, Judge Shannon turned to the facts of the case to determine whether, in the exercise of his discretion, designation of the RSA parties' votes would be appropriate. Judge Shannon found it significant that the parties to the RSA "were acting at all times to maximize their own recoveries . . .."16 When parties are acting in their own self-interest, "Courts have been extremely reluctant to penalize such parties through designation."17 Furthermore, the fact that the RSA contained a remedy of specific performance if the RSA parties did not vote in favor of a conforming plan did not require designation. "In the event the Debtors' proposed Plan differed materially from what was contemplated by the [RSA parties], obviously they would not be obligated to vote for it."18 Therefore, consistent with the 3rd Circuit's goal of "construing [] disclosure and solicitation provisions in a way that [does not] chill[] or hamstring[] the negotiation process that is at the heart of Chapter 11," Judge Shannon denied the plan objectors' motion to have the votes of the parties to the RSA designated.19


Having dispensed with the plan objectors' designation request, Judge Shannon turned to, among other things, an objection to the plan's third party release provision. Under the debtors' plan, unimpaired creditors who were deemed to have accepted the plan, creditors who voted for the plan but did not check a box on the ballot indicating their desire to opt out of the third-party release, and creditors who abstained from voting and did not otherwise indicate their desire to opt out of the third party release provision were all deemed to have consented to the release provision. The U.S. Trustee objected to the provision, arguing that "the Third Party Release is unenforceable without affirmative consent."20 Disagreeing, Judge Shannon stated that there is "no such hard and fast rule."21 In this case, the deemed acceptance by the unimpaired creditors was permissible because "these creditors are being paid in full and have therefore received consideration for the releases. As for those impaired creditors who abstained from voting on the Plan, or who voted to reject the Plan and did not otherwise opt out of the releases, the record reflects these parties were provided detailed instructions on how to opt out, and had the opportunity to do so by marking their ballots. Under these circumstances, the Third Party Releases may be properly characterized as consensual and will be approved."22


Indianapolis Downs is a notable decision for its discussion of many plan confirmation issues. With regards to the effectiveness of post-petition lock-up agreements, the case law remains limited and conflicting. However, Indianapolis Downs should be viewed as strong support for the use of post-petition lock-up agreements as a way to negotiate for support of a confirmable Chapter 11 plan in Delaware bankruptcy cases among sophisticated and well represented parties. To minimize the chance of votes being designated, debtors, creditors and other stakeholders who are contemplating entering into a post-petition lock-up agreement should be mindful that the parties to the agreement are sophisticated, well represented, acting in good faith, and in furtherance of their own self-interest to maximize their respective recoveries. Moreover, parties to a post-petition lock-up should make sure to promptly disclose the agreement to the court.

Indianapolis Downs also offers an expansive interpretation of the propriety of a third-party release provision, especially where an impaired creditor has abstained from voting and taken no affirmative action consenting to the release. Indianapolis Downs should serve as a warning to creditors of the pitfalls of failing to review proposed plans and their accompanying ballots. All interested parties should make sure to carefully review any proposed plan and its release provisions to ensure awareness of the effect inaction may have on claims they may hold against non-debtor parties.


1 Case No. 11-11046 (BLS).

2 11 U.S.C. § 1125(b) ("An acceptance or rejection of a plan may not be solicited after the commencement of the case . . . unless, at the time of or before such solicitation, there is transmitted . . . a written disclosure statement approved, after notice and a hearing, by the court as containing adequate information").

3 See In re Stations Holding Co., 2004 WL 1857116, at *1 (Bankr. D. Del. Aug. 18, 2004) (stating that the court had previously granted plan objector's motion to designate votes "finding the lock-up agreements were improper solicitations prohibited by Section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code"); see also In re NII Holdings, Inc., Case No. 02-11505 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002) (Order dated October 25, 2002); see also Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of New World Pasta Co. v. New World Pasta Co., 322 B.R. 560, 568 (M.D. Pa. 2005) (restating the Stations Holding and NII Holdings rulings).

4 11 U.S.C. § 1126(e) ("the court may designate any entity whose acceptance or rejection of such plan was not in good faith, or was not solicited or procured in good faith or in accordance with the provisions of this title") (emphasis added).

5 See Stations Holding, 2004 WL 1857116, at *1; see also In re NII Holdings, Case No. 02-11505 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002) (Order dated October 25, 2002).

6 In re Indianapolis Downs, LLC, --- B.R. ----, 2013 WL 395137, at *3-*7 (Bankr. D. Del. Jan. 31, 2013).

7 The Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases of Indianapolis Downs and Indiana Downs are being jointly administered.

8 Id. at *2.

9 Id. at *3.

10 Id. at *5.

11 376 B.R. 783, 794 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2007).

12 Indianapolis Downs, 2004 WL 1857116, at *6.

13 Id. at *5.

14 Id.

15 Id.

16 Id. at *6.

17 Id.

18 Id.

19 Id. at *7.

20 Id. at *16.

21 Id.

22 Id. at *17 (emphasis added).


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions