United States: Inventive Features Repeatedly Emphasized In A Patent Cannot Be Overlooked In Claim Construction

In Parallel Networks, LLC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., No. 12-1227 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2013), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's claim constructions and SJ of noninfringement, and also affirmed the district court's denial of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion seeking leave to amend infringement contentions.

Parallel Networks, LLC ("Parallel") owns U.S. Patent No. 6,446,111 ("the '111 patent"), which is directed to the use of individualized applets in handheld devices to speed up data transfer. Parallel filed suit against numerous defendants, alleging that the defendants' websites provided applets in response to user requests in a manner that infringed the '111 patent.The district court construed certain claim terms that the defendants contended were case dispositive, including the terms "executable applet" and "dynamically generated by the server in response to the request."Regarding the "dynamically generated" term, the district court adopted the defendants' construction that an applet that is "dynamically generated by the server in response to the request" is an applet constructed at the server by combining the requisite functional code with the necessary data at the time of and in response to the client request. In each of the accused instrumentalities, at least one of the functional code or necessary data was required for accessing a link, which necessitated a subsequent transmission between the client and the server to combine the data and functionality required for the applet to operate.

Based on this finding and in view of the adopted constructions, the district court granted SJ of noninfringement for various defendants and later severed them from the case.Parallel also filed a Rule 59(e) motion seeking leave to amend its infringement contentions in order to allege infringement against certain defendants based on the district court's claim construction, which Parallel argued was an unexpected and intervening change in the law.The district court denied the motion. Parallel appealed the district court's claim constructions, noninfringement rulings, and denial of the Rule 59(e) motion to the Federal Circuit with respect to the severed defendants.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit first addressed the district court's claim constructions. Agreeing with the district court that the data manipulation service (or functionality) and the particularized data are both necessary components of the applet as it is initially generated and before it is transferred to the client, the Court noted that asserted claim 1 teaches that the applet is "generated" in response to a user request, is "executable" and "operable," is "associated with" the two "constituent" systems of particularized data and functionality, and is thereafter "to be transferred."The Court found that, taken together, these terms described a natural progression in the asserted claims: upon receipt of a user request, the server generated an applet with two constituent parts (the functionality and the particularized data).Furthermore, that applet is executable (i.e., capable of being executed and carried out fully and completely) and is then transferred to the client device for execution.

"What purportedly made the [asserted] patent unique and inventive was combining and transmitting the particularized data and functionality 'as a group' in order to transfer an 'executable applet' and reduce the number of transmissions over the communications link.[The plaintiff] cannot now claim that a limitation that featured so critically in the patent was not, in fact, a part of the invention."Slip op. at 23.

The Court found that Figure 3 of the '111 patent depicts this chronology and that the specification substantiates this construction. In particular, the specification noted that "combining the data and functionality at the outset and transmitting them 'as a group' facilitates the invention's key goal of 'greatly reduc[ing]' the number of communications over low-speed networks."Slip op. at 17-18 (alteration in original) (citation omitted).Based on this construction, the Court held that a finding of noninfringement directly followed since each of the accused instrumentalities was missing at least one portion of the functional code or data when the applet, which included only a link for the missing portion, was transferred to the client.

Next, the Court addressed Parallel's challenge to the district court's construction of the "dynamically generated" term. Parallel contended that the district court erred in construing "generated by the server" to mean "constructed at the server, by combining," because "generate" is broader than "combine," and that the asserted claims require only that the data and the functionality be "associated with" the applet, not combined into a single file with the applet.Id. at 18-19.Rejecting Parallel's position, the Court explained that the meaning that Parallel urged for the term "associated with" was overly expansive and would effectively rewrite the '111 patent, as the '111 patent clearly teaches an applet containing both the data and the functionality when the applet is generated.

The Court then addressed Parallel's remaining arguments concerning the district court's constructions. Parallel argued that the term "generated by the server" was incorrectly construed as "generated at the server."Id. at 20.Recognizing that "by" does not necessarily mean "at," the Court nonetheless found that Parallel provided no indication as to why the difference between "by" and "at" mattered in this context, as the critical point for the case was that the applet cannot be finalized at the client. The Court also rejected Parallel's arguments regarding the district court's construction of "dynamically . . . in response to the request" to mean "at the time of and in response to the request."Id. at 21.The Court reasoned that although an applet could be generated "in response to" a request even if it were generated at some later point rather than at the exact time of the request, that did not affect the critical requirement that the applet be generated and executable before it is transferred to the client.

The Court also rejected Parallel's argument against the district court's construction of "dynamically generated" to require that the data and functionality be transferred to the client in a single transmission. In support of these arguments, Parallel cited to numerous examples in the specification that describe more than one transmission over a communications link. In rejecting these arguments, the Court noted that Parallel conflated two different concepts:(1) the generation of the applet at the server and its transmission to the client; and (2) the operation of the applet after it has been fully transferred to the client. While the '111 patent claims deal with the former concept, the portions of the specification that Parallel cited to deal only with the latter concept, and the Court therefore found these arguments unpersuasive.

Based on its critique of the district court's claim construction, Parallel argued that the district court's infringement analysis was necessarily erroneous. Parallel argued that it does not matter whether the client device needs to make a separate request to receive the associated data or functionality because, in both instances, the constituent system is sufficiently "associated with" the applet. Rejecting Parallel's position, the Court noted that Parallel admitted that the executable applet must consist of both data and functionality, and that the '111 patent repeatedly emphasizes that feature. The Court further stated that "[w]hat purportedly made the '111 patent unique and inventive was combining and transmitting the particularized data and functionality 'as a group,'" and "Parallel cannot now claim that a limitation that featured so critically in the patent was not, in fact, a part of the invention."Id. at 23.

Finally, the Court addressed Parallel's challenge to the district court's denial of the Rule 59(e) motion. Parallel contended that the district court did not address one of three factors that the Fifth Circuit considers under Rule 59(e)—the need to prevent a "manifest injustice"—and failed to consider four "good cause" factors for allowing amendments to infringement contentions under Local Patent Rule 3-6(b) for the district court. In rejecting Parallel's arguments, the Court agreed with the district court that Parallel was seeking to amend its infringement contentions to make arguments that could have been made before the entry of SJ, and that the district court's claim construction was not an intervening change in the law. The Court noted that Parallel chose to pursue a theory that allowed it to accuse a larger number of defendants, and, having lost, "may not now initiate what would amount to a completely new infringement proceeding."Id. at 24.The Court also found that the need to prevent a "manifest injustice" is a catch-all factor that was already implicit in the district court's consideration and rejection of Parallel's motion as a whole. Furthermore, the Court agreed with the district court that Local Patent Rule 3-6(b) was inapplicable, because the adopted claim construction could have been anticipated, and because Parallel had provided no good explanation for its failure to bring its new infringement contentions earlier and thus brought any perceived prejudice on itself.

Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's claim constructions, SJ of noninfringement, and denial of Parallel's Rule 59(e) motion.

Judges:Prost, Bryson (author), Wallach

[Appealed from E.D. Tex., Chief Judge Davis]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, February 2013

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Nov 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Finnegan partner Anthony Tridico will present “U.S. Patent Case Law Update” at the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys’ annual Patent Case Law Review.

28 Nov 2017, Seminar, Milan, Italy

Finnegan partner John Paul will present “Internet of Things: Patent Liability, Enforcement and Licensing” and will join the Mock WIPO Mediation at International Technology Transfer—Licensing and ADR, co-hosted by Licensing Executives Society and World Intellectual Property Organization.

29 Nov 2017, Seminar, Tel Aviv, Israel

Finnegan is a platinum sponsor IVC Research Center’s start-up forum, “The Most Promising Start Ups for 2017 – A Synergy of Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Vision and IoT.”

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.