The US IPO market produced seven IPOs in January 2013—the busiest start to the year since 2006. Buoyed by the $2.2 billion IPO of Pfizer’s animal health unit Zoetis, gross proceeds in January were $3.3 billion—the highest January figure since 2000. The month included IPOs by well-established companies with proven revenue and profitability as well as a trio of biotech offerings.
The average first-day gain for January’s IPOs was 18% compared to 16% for all IPOs in 2012. Norwegian Cruise Line, Bright Horizons and Zoetis enjoyed first-day gains of 30%, 29% and 19%, respectively—these gains were all the more striking because each offering was priced above the range. There were no “broken” IPOs (IPOs whose stock closes below the offering price on their opening day) in the month.
With offerings by KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, LipoScience and Stemline Therapeutics during the last week of January, the biotech IPO market began the year with a solid start. LipoScience and Stemline rose 16% and 18%, respectively, in first-day trading while KaloBios was flat. Each of these IPOs priced at the bottom of the range.
The remaining January IPO was by Starwood-backed homebuilder TRI Pointe Homes, which saw a 12% first-day gain after pricing above the range.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In recent months Bitcoin has become a hot topic in the financial, regulatory and legal community and has received widespread attention from newspapers such as The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP has been actively working on Bitcoin-related matters for the past year and has become a legal thought-leader in the area.
On November 14, the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission created confusion and consternation in the derivatives world by issuing an advisory indicating that certain requirements will apply to swaps entered into between a registered non-U.S. swap dealer and a non-U.S. person if the swap is handled by personnel or agents of the non-U.S. swap dealer located in the United States.
Introduced in 2003 by amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970 (FCRA), the identity theft red flags rule (Red Flags Rule) required the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to issue rules that require certain regulated entities to implement programs designed to detect against, prevent and mitigate identity theft.