United States: U.S. District Court Issues False Claims Act Judgment For Defendants In Case Challenging Competitive Bidding For DME Contract

After a fourteen-day bench trial, a Mississippi federal court in United States ex rel. Jamison v. McKesson Corp., et al., Civ. A. No. 2:08-cv-214-SA-JMV (N.D. Miss. Sept. 28, 2012), rendered a complete verdict for the defense, holding that in this federal False Claims Act case based on the Anti-Kickback Statute ("AKS") , the United States had failed to carry its burden to prove that illegal remuneration had been offered or accepted, or that any defendant had acted with the scienter required by the AKS. While much of the Court's verdict in this intervened case turned on facts and circumstances particular to the case, the Court's assessment of what is required to prove remuneration and scienter has important implications for companies that may face similar allegations.

What is – and what is not – "remuneration" under the AKS?

The focus of the trial was on two DME supply contracts between subsidiaries of McKesson Corporation and entities representing Beverly Enterprises, an operator of skilled nursing facilities. For each contract, the government's theory was that the prospect of another contract or other business with Beverly was successfully "dangled" in front of the McKesson subsidiaries in order to induce below fair market value, below cost, or discounted bids from the McKesson defendants. While the theory that a business opportunity can constitute "remuneration" under the AKS is not new, see, e.g., United States v. Bay State Ambulance and Hosp. Rental Serv., 874 F.2d 20, 29 (1st Cir. 1989), pursuing the theory in this case was aggressive, and the Court rejected it for good reason.

Prospect of Additional Business. At the outset of the bidding process for the 2003 contract, there was evidence that the prospect of another valuable contract was on the table; the government's theory was that this opportunity was "dangled" in front of the bidding defendants to induce lower bids. However, before final bids were submitted on the contract at issue, the other business opportunity was awarded to someone else, and the evidence presented at trial was that the McKesson defendants knew this. The court held that under these circumstances it was "illogical" to conclude either that the bidding defendants' final bid was improperly induced (the opportunity was known to be gone before the bid was submitted) or that the offering defendants intended to use the opportunity to induce lower bids (if the opportunity was intended to induce lower bids, the offering defendants wouldn't have taken the opportunity off the table before the final bids were submitted). While logic drove the court's decision here, it is noteworthy that DOJ pressed – through trial – a theory that defies common sense, and that the Court required trial to resolve this issue in favor of defendants.1

Fair Market Value. The government also argued at trial that the McKesson defendants had offered "remuneration" to secure the contracts through below fair market value or below cost bids. At trial, defendants' bids were not out of line with competing bids, and internal accounting analyses consistently projected that the contracts would be profitable at the bid amounts. Relying on a mix of common sense, court decisions and expert testimony, the Court concluded that competitive bidding can establish fair market value. Because the Court had already rejected the government's contention that the bid process was tainted by the dangling/carving out of contracts, the theory that the defendants' bids were below FMV was rejected as well. With respect to the below cost bid theory, the Court focused on the government's burden, and the government's inability to carry it. The government certainly had an uphill battle – there was testimony that the accounting method that defendants had employed was a well-accepted method of analyzing profitability, and that defendants had in fact performed several analyses of the pricing and potential profitability of the contracts. Given this record, the surprise is not that the Court concluded that the Government failed to prove that the bids (and contracts) were below cost, but rather that the United States pursued this theory through trial.

What is – and what is not – "knowing and willful" misconduct under the AKS?

At trial, the government showed that in preparing cost projections for the contracts at issue, employees of the McKesson defendants on "several occasions" used arbitrary (but thought to be conservative) numbers in their cost analyses, "misplaced" numbers from one type of analysis to another, and extrapolated costs and other data based on subsets that may not have been representative. The government argued that this sufficiently proved intentional or deliberate mishandling of the numbers, and thus satisfied the scienter required for an AKS-based FCA claim. Highlighting the "number and differing backgrounds" of the persons putting together the projections, the Court concluded instead that the evidence was more likely that the employees were negligent or careless, and – critically – that "such carelessness did not evidence a willful wrong intentionally committed against the Government" as the AKS requires. This analysis by the Court should provide some relief to companies in the industry because mere carelessness or administrative errors were not viewed by the Court as sufficient to sustain liability.


There are at least two principal takeaways from the Jamison trial. First, DOJ continues to be interested in pursuing potential AKS violations and has shown a willingness to push an aggressive view of the statute that may not distinguish imperfect choices, flawed decisions, or run-of-the-mill carelessness from knowing and willful fraud. While these aggressive theories may survive summary judgment, when put to the test of trial, here at least they came up short. This point leads to the second takeaway: courts can be reluctant to reject theories of liability – especially complex ones – without the kind of full record that a trial provides. Yet, the court here ultimately took a strong position in favor of the defendants, suggesting that corporate defendants should be prepared to vindicate their rights at trial and have some confidence that a court will provide recourse.


1 In the summary judgment opinion, the Court explained that further fact development was necessary before a decision could be rendered. The Court, however, appears to have been aware that the McKesson defendants were informed about the other business opportunity being awarded to someone else in January 2003 before the execution of the first contract in February 2003. The opinion does not explain why this fact would not support summary judgment, but the Court may have believed it needed additional facts to determine if the fact that the notification came late in the bidding process was significant. U.S. ex rel. Jamison v. McKesson Corp., et al., Civ. A. No. 2:08-cv-214-SA-JMV, 2012 WL 487998, *2, 5 (Feb. 14, 2012).


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions