The Social Security Administration has announced an increase in
the Social Security taxable wage base in 2013 from $110,100 to
$113,700. The $3,600 increase is slightly more than the $3,300
increase from 2011 to 2012. The cap was just $106,800 from 2009 to
2011, as inflation ground to a halt during the economic
The wage cap is the maximum amount of compensation subject to
tax under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) for old
age, survivors and disability insurance (OASDI) — typically
called Social Security tax. FICA imposes both Medicare tax and
Social Security tax on compensation received for services at
matching employer and employee rates (with self-employed taxpayers
effectively paying both shares on self-employment income). Although
the Social Security tax is capped, the Medicare portion of FICA tax
applies to total earnings, with no limit on the amount.
The Social Security tax rate is generally 6.2% for both
employers and employees, but under a special temporary provision it
is only 4.2% for individuals in 2012. The rate is scheduled to
revert to 6.2% in 2013 without legislative action. The maximum
total individual share of Social Security tax is capped at
$4,624.20 in 2012 but is scheduled to jump to $7,049.40 in 2013,
with a return to the 6.2% rate and the higher wage cap.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
A recent decision of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California should remind employers to regularly verify the actions of payroll service providers regardless of the provider's reputation and the longevity of the relationship.
The IRS announced in interim guidance that it would amend Section 20.1.7 of the Internal Revenue Manual to provide a methodology for the calculation of intentional disregard penalties under Section 6721...
3M returns to its argument that Treas. Reg. § 1.482-1(h)(2) is "procedurally invalid" because Treasury and the IRS failed to satisfy the requirements of section 553 of the APA when they promulgated the regulations.
Following a one day bench trial, Cook County Circuit Judge Thomas Mulroy ruled in favor of Treasury Wine Estates in Illinois False Claims Act litigation filed by the law firm of Stephen B. Diamond, PC.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).