We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
This decision is largely viewed as an expansion of agency
activities subject to ESA section 7 consultation. While only
directly applicable in the Ninth Circuit, the decision has several
potential significant implications:
Thousands of agency decisions not previously considered to be
"agency action" for purposes of section 7 consultation
must now be considered "agency action," and thus subject
to formal section 7 ESA consultation. Formal consultation is a
time-intensive process involving agency review and preparation of a
biological opinion, a process that takes, at a minimum, 135 days.
These decisions largely fall into areas involving mining, water
rights, and forestry, and will likely significantly delay agency
decision-making.
This delay will be compounded in light of the Services'
ongoing budgetary restrictions and administrative burden imposed by
the Fall 2011 settlement between USFWS and environmental
organizations that requires USFWS to make listing decisions for
hundreds of species on a court-imposed timeline.
Due to the potential for significant impacts within and beyond
the Ninth Circuit, and apparent conflict with established precedent
in the Ninth and other circuits, this case is a prime candidate for
U.S. Supreme Court review.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has published a proposed rule entitled Response to Petition for Rulemaking; Findings of Substantial Inadequacy; and SIP Calls to Amend Provisions Applying to Excess Emissions During Periods of Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction.
Last week, the European Parliament rejected a proposal to reduce the quantity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions allowances in order to fix a supply-demand imbalance in the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS).
It may be time for our federal courts to rethink their reluctance to accept major environmental claims that the courts of other countries are simply not yet able to handle.
After being taken to task by states and its own Inspector General for lack of final guidance on Vapor Intrusion, EPA has just released draft guidance documents for hazardous substances and petroleum products for comment.
California's cap-and-trade program mandates that certain covered entities acquire allowances for each metric ton of greenhouse gas (GHG) they emit during specified compliance periods.
Last Friday, EPA announced release of its draft proposal to revise the effluent guidelines and standards for the steam electric power generating industry, last revised in 1982.
On April 19, 2013, EPA released the proposed "Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category" (Steam Electric ELG). The proposed Steam Electric ELG would revise the existing technology-based effluent limitations guidelines [40 CFR 423] for most steam electric power plants and their discharges to U.S. waters or POTWs.
In a decision that should not have come as a surprise to anyone, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Thursday, in "Conservation Northwest v. Sherman", that the Bureau of Land Management and other agencies implementing the Northwest Forest Plan could not amend the NFP.
