The Federal Rules of Evidence do
not explicitly allow or forbid jurors from submitting questions to
the court. Rule 611(a) Federal courts have interpreted
this rule to leave to the discretion of the trial judge whether to
allow questions from jurors. See, e.g.DeBenedetto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 754 F.2d
512, 515 (4th Cir. 1985). Why does the practice remain so
rare?
The advantages of allowing jurors
to submit questions are apparent. It helps jurors get a
fuller comprehension of the facts, gives them the opportunity to
clarify testimony, and engages them in a process to which they are
a critical and vital part. Frankly, it can resolve problems
with lawyers asking bad questions! Certainly, the practice
should keep more jurors attentive and awake during trial.
Although, that has not worked in the Clemens trial as the jurors
continue to snooze and yawn during testimony. At the end of
the day, say proponents, juror questions during trial leads to more
fully reasoned and just verdicts.
On the other hand, allowing jurors
to ask witnesses questions, promotes jurors to act as advocates not
fact finders. Jurors may place too much weight on their own
questions, ignore the evidence and simply confirm their
preconceived notions. Jurors may also become understandably
agitated when, as Judge Walton has done, they are told they are not
entitled to an answer. In these ways, allowing juror
questions may actually compromise the adversarial process.
In any event, allowing jurors to
submit questions mid-trial gives prosecutors and defendants alike
unique insight into how the jury perceives their witnesses and
understands the evidence. Counsel can use these insights to
shift tactics to address juror concern. Also, this window
into the jurors' thinking may promote resolution.
In the Clemens trial, the questions
submitted showed that several jurors question the credibility of
Clemens' former personal trainer, Brian McNamee. After
three days of McNamee's testimony, maybe the jurors are merely
stating the obvious to the Court and the lawyers. One thing
is clear, juror questions during trial and deliberations will
always have lawyers playing guessing games.
There is no doubt that the
prosecution and defense will answer the question and explain
why McNamee should or should not be believed.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.
A discussion on some practical tools lawyers can use, or consider using, in order to decrease defense costs and to increase the chance of concluding a case sooner rather than later.
Carlton Fields recently published a survey (pdf) of 368 general counsel and other in-house counsel at major companies across more than 25 industries regarding the class actions they faced in 2012 and their expectations for 2013.
A financial services organization is a party to a litigation in which plaintiffs are seeking information concerning business practices that impacts a number of the organization's customers.
Twitter
Facebook
Digg 
