prior rant, I raised the concern that EPA would oppose the use
of new cleanup technologies based on nanotechnologies on the basis
of the precautionary principle. I may not have been exactly on the
mark, but I was pretty close. On Thursday, the NRDC announced that it has filed suit
challenging EPA's decision to issue a conditional registration of a nanosilver-based
antimicrobial agent. The NRDC asserts that EPA's use of the
conditional registration process is "illegal," apparently
because EPA does not have sufficient information to justify a
conclusion that use of the nanosilver products do not cause
"unreasonable adverse effects to human health and the
environment." According to the NRDC, EPA's decision is
just the most recent example in a
long line of decisions that treats [sic] humans and our
environmental as guinea pigs for these untested pesticides.
As noted in my prior post, there is a difference between
regulating in spite of uncertainty
– which can frequently be justified – and
regulating because of uncertainty,
which is deeply troubling. Nanomaterials hold great promise in a
wide number of fields, including many uses – such as
antimicrobials – focused on
protecting public health and the
What is the basis for keeping these materials off the market
just because we haven't proved that they don't pose a
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals issued a significant decision in Maryland Department of the Environment, et al. v. Anacostia Riverkeeper, et al., holding that the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Permit issued by the Maryland Department of the Environment to Montgomery County, Md., violated the Federal Clean Water Act and state of Maryland law.
Peggy Strand, Amy J. McMaster, Kathryn Kusske Floyd, Jay C. Johnson, Margaret K. Fawal and Laura E. Boorman published "The Significance Of The Nexus For Wetlands Jurisdiction" in Law360 on April 1, 2015.
Those who have tried to keep up with the development of environmental law into the second decade of the 21st century will not be surprised, as others may be, by the attention now focused on reuse of soil.
Last week the Southern District of Ohio held that air emissions from DuPont’s Teflon production operations at its Washington Works Facility in West Virginia constituted disposal of solid waste under RCRA.