The report analyzed board committee charters at S&P 100
firms and found that only 65 companies in the S&P 100 have
board committees with some level of responsibility for oversight of
corporate responsibility concerns. One of the most notable
statistics from the study was the finding that less than 50% of
those 65 boards monitor and provide recommendations on CSR trends
Ultimately, this lack of focus on trends is troubling. Looking
at developments in the CSR field over the previous decades, it is
not hard to see that stakeholder expectations in the areas of
environmental and social standards have often lead to the
developments of new regulations, legislation, and lending
guidelines. As I noted in the article,
Understanding key trends is an
integral component of effective long-term strategy development and
can help ensure that companies have the capacity to respond to
concerns when they arise. Companies regularly seek to identify
trends in consumer preferences and in regulatory environments.
Companies should exercise the same diligence in identifying future
stakeholder expectations with regard to social and environmental
performance. Stakeholder expectations in the area of CSR frequently
ask companies to go "beyond compliance" with existing
legal and regulatory standards. At the same time, these
expectations are often predictive of the future content of legal
and regulatory requirements.
A full copy of the article is available here (.pdf).
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In an attempt to address or prevent any money launderer's access to the U.S. financial system through accounts serviced by registered investment advisers, the Department of Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on September 1, 2015.
A headline-grabbing SEC enforcement action last week against BDO USA and several of its national partners may lead audit firms to insist on more audit committee-led investigations when questionable transactions are identified.
In In re Dole Food Co., Inc. Stockholder Litigation, the Delaware Court of Chancery held two directors of Dole Food Company, one of whom was Dole's controlling stockholder, jointly and severally liable for $148 million in damages in connection with a going-private transaction by the controlling stockholder.