Munir Patel, an administrative clerk at London's Redbridge
Magistrates' Court whose October guilty plea made him the first
person to be convicted under the new UK Bribery Act, was sentenced
this morning in the Southwark Crown Court to six years in prison.
Patel's sentence includes a three-year prison term for
violations of Section 2 of the Bribery Act and a six-year sentence
for misconduct in public office. The sentences will run
concurrently, for a total six-year prison sentence.
In handing down the sentence, Judge Alistair McCreath noted that
Patel's conduct spanned more than a year and involved at least
53 cases in which traffic violators made payments to avoid
penalties. Describing Patel's offense as "serious,"
Judge McCreath highlighted that Patel's sole motivation was
greed and that his acts resulted in a personal gain of at least
Representing perhaps the most significant and wide-ranging
anti-corruption legislation in history, the UK Bribery Act and its
inevitable enforcement have been greatly anticipated by UK
companies, UK citizens and residents, and those conducting business
in the UK. While the Patel case was initially viewed with some
skepticism by those who had anticipated that the first UK Bribery
Act prosecution would involve more far-reaching conduct and
significant corporate wrong doing, the resulting sentence makes
clear that the UK government, Serious Fraud Office, and prosecutors
alike intend to make good on promises to utilize the new Act as a
significant tool in the fight against corruption.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In its first public Policy Statement regarding the treatment of cooperation in investigations, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board provided guidance on how it will consider a firm’s or associated person’s "extraordinary cooperation".
After a two-week trial before United States District Court Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California, David Nosal was convicted of three counts of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in United States v. Walsh ruled that the defendant could not use the proceeds from the sale of his house to fund his criminal defense because he used tainted funds to obtain the home.
In Commonwealth v. Nies, No. 5793-2012 (Pa. Ct. Com. Pl, Apr. 18, 2013), the Honorable John A. Boccabella of the Berks County Court of Common Pleas applied a somewhat rare exception to the requirement that those who do not submit to a blood test in connection with a DUI investigation are subject to enhanced sentencing requirements.