ARTICLE
16 December 2010

Sweeping Changes to Michigan's Part 201 "Brownfield" Cleanup Law Enacted

In the final "lame duck" moments of the 2010 Legislative Session, the Michigan Legislature approved a five-bill package of amendments to Part 201 of Michigan Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (NREPA).
United States Environment

In the final "lame duck" moments of the 2010 Legislative Session, the Michigan Legislature approved a five-bill package of amendments to Part 201 of Michigan Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (NREPA). This move comes about four months after the State Senate passed these reforms on Aug. 17, 2010, on which we previously reported. This legislation is the result of years of dialogue among various stakeholders and is an attempt to fix problem areas in the Part 201 clean-up program that were not working to the satisfaction of the MDNRE or the regulated community. The legislation was signed into law by Governor Granholm on Dec. 14, 2010, as she prepares to exit office, and the legislation is to take immediate effect.

The MDNRE is reportedly working on a transition plan, but the expected changes to reorganize MDNRE and appointment of a new Director by Governor-elect Snyder will no doubt delay some of these implementation steps and any rule-making.

The significant aspects of the Part 201 legislation are set out below:

Baseline Environmental Assessment (BEA) will be preserved but substantially replaced by the Federal "All Appropriate Inquiry" and bona fide prospective purchaser provisions. However, some basis (either doing sampling or using available data) will be necessary to characterize the property as a "Facility." There will be no process for BEA approval by MDNRE, no categories based on future hazardous substance usage (None/Different/Same), and no requirement that a "baseline" be established to distinguish new releases from old contamination (although this may still be good practice). The new BEA process will continue to provide liability protection for persons assuming control of property with historic releases.

No Further Action (NFA) process will provide for clean-up completion or closure following either self-implemented remedial action or a MDNRE-approved Response Activity Plan. The MDNRE has 150 days to review NFA requests or Response Activity Plans (180 days if the plan is subject to public review and comment), or they will be deemed approved automatically. Self-implemented cleanup efforts are allowed and encouraged and new liability protection (under Section 26) is established for a party holding a NFA report or letter. Land use changes are allowed at the new developer's expense.

Clean-Up Criteria will be simplified to "Residential" and "Non-Residential" (f/k/a Industrial) instead of the current multitude of clean-up criteria, and site-specific clean-up criteria may be allowed. Specific changes will clarify groundwater-surface water interface (GSI) criteria under Rule 716/Part 31 (water quality standards) and the remediating party can propose a "site specific approach" with alternative compliance points and use of monitoring wells. Ordinances will be permitted in lieu of institutional controls and clean-up criteria will be updated annually by rulemaking. If a cleanup criterion is lower than either the method detection limit or background concentration for that hazardous substance, then the higher value will control as the criterion.

Response Activity Review Panel will be established to address technical issues (not liability determinations) arising from Response Activity Plan or NFA denials. Members of this panel will be appointed by the MDNRE Director, and the Review Panel's decisions will be subject to final action by the Director and potential judicial appeal. Petition fees to the Panel will be $3,500 per petition.

Due Care obligations under Section 7a will be expanded to align with federal "Continuing Obligations" (access, cleanup cooperation, deed restrictions). Due care exemptions will no longer exist for municipalities if they invite the public to use the contaminated property they own.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More