ARTICLE
10 January 2019

New York Judge Finds $600M Opioid Surcharge Unconstitutional

RG
Ropes & Gray LLP

Contributor

Ropes & Gray is a preeminent global law firm with approximately 1,400 lawyers and legal professionals serving clients in major centers of business, finance, technology and government. The firm has offices in New York, Washington, D.C., Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, London, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Tokyo and Seoul.
In December 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that New York's $600 million fee on the sale of opioids into the state unconstitutionally prohibits pharmaceutical companies from passing the cost onto consumers.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

In December 2018,  the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that New York’s $600 million fee on the sale of opioids into the state unconstitutionally prohibits pharmaceutical companies from passing the cost onto consumers. Furthermore, the Court ruled that the Opioid Stewardship Act (OSA) violated U.S. Constitution's dormant commerce clause and, therefore, was unconstitutional. The OSA would have forced manufacturers and distributors of opioid medications to pay pro rata shares of a $100 million annual penalty (using a volumetric calculation based on opioid strength, rather than price) while forbidding manufacturers and distributors from passing any portion of that annual cost to New York purchasers.

Please see this Law360 article to read more about the case.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More