On September 21, 2007, respondents George W. Davis and Catherine V. Davis filed their brief in Davis v. Kentucky Department of Revenue of the Finance and Administration Cabinet, urging that the U.S. Supreme Court affirm a Kentucky appellate court's early 2006 ruling holding unconstitutional a statute that exempts from Kentucky's income tax interest on municipal bonds issued by Kentucky issuers while taxing interest on municipal bonds issued in other states. The brief on behalf of the Kentucky taxpayers, who paid Kentucky income tax on their out-of-state municipal mutual fund holdings, lists nine different law firms as co-counsel, including Bingham McCutchen as counsel of record and various plaintiffs' class action firms....
Error Your web browser is not set to accept Cookies You must have cookies enabled to access our articles on Mondaq.Com. Your Login Details have been provided correctly but can not be passed to our content module. If you are happy to proceed and have enabled cookies, Below is some information about what cookies are and why they are used. What does a cookie do? Why do I have to have them enabled? Can cookies read other information stored on my computer? |
Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.
| Do you have a question for the author? |

