United States: Mississippi Supreme Court Holds Combined Group Could Use Affiliates’ Tax Credits To Offset Income

The Mississippi Supreme Court recently has held that a combined group could offset its corporate income tax liability with gaming license fee tax credits earned by some of its affiliates.1 Under the tax credit statute, each affiliate that earned the credit could use it to offset its income tax liability. Because each affiliate was jointly and severally liable for the tax liability of the entire group, each affiliate's tax liability was the same as the group's tax liability. Therefore, the credits earned by the affiliates could be used by the combined group. The Court also held that the taxpayer satisfied the statutory surety bond requirements.

Background

The taxpayer, which owned and operated a group of Mississippi casinos, elected to compute its Mississippi corporate income tax on a combined basis with its affiliated entities.2 Four entities in the affiliated group held Mississippi gaming licenses and paid license fees based on their monthly gross revenue from gaming operations. The taxpayer used the license fees as a credit to offset its combined corporate income tax liability for the 2007 tax year. Applying the credits in the same manner, the taxpayer filed amended returns for the 2004 through 2006 tax years. After auditing the taxpayer's returns for the 2004 through 2007 tax years, the Mississippi Department of Revenue assessed over $4 million in taxes, penalties and interest. The assessment was based on the Department's determination that only the tax liability of the four entities that actually held the licenses was eligible for offset. According to the Department, the credit belonged exclusively to the entities that paid the license fee and could not be used to benefit the combined group as a whole.

The Mississippi Board of Review and Mississippi Board of Tax Appeals both affirmed the Department's assessment with minor changes. The taxpayer appealed to a county chancery court and filed a surety bond for half the assessment as required by statute. The chancery court granted summary judgment for the taxpayer and overturned the Department's assessment. The Department appealed the chancery court's decision.

Combined Group Could Use Credits

The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed the chancery court and held that the taxpayer could use its affiliates' credits to offset the income tax liability of the entire combined group. In reaching its decision, the Court rejected the Department's argument that the tax liability of the group must be determined individually when applying the gaming license fee tax credit. The Department argued that each entity's credit could be used only to offset the tax the entity would be required to pay if it were filing its own return. Under this approach, a credit could not be used to the extent it exceeded the entity's tax liability.

The taxpayer relied on a case, General Motors Corp. v. Mississippi State Tax Commission,3 concerning the issue of using credits earned by one entity to offset the combined tax liability of an affiliated group of entities. In General Motors, the taxpayer and its affiliated group filed on a combined basis.4 The affiliated group applied a privilege tax credit earned by one of the affiliated entities to its total tax liability. The Mississippi Supreme Court held in General Motors that the credit could be used to offset the entire affiliated group's tax liability. Because the affiliate that earned the credit was jointly and severally liable with respect to the affiliated group's tax, the Court reasoned in General Motors that the credit was being used to offset the affiliate's tax due.

The Court disagreed with the Department's arguments that General Motors did not apply to the instant case. The Department argued that the statute that governed combined returns for the tax years at issue (and is the current statute) is different than when General Motors was decided in 1987. The more recent statute instructs taxpayers to combine the income or loss of the individual entities to determine the affiliated group's net income. Any credits are applied after the combined group's tax liability is computed. The Court determined that this approach is consistent with the reasoning in General Motors that the credit does not become part of the tax calculation until after the tax becomes due and joint and several liability has attached to each member of the reporting group. The application of the statutory instructions on how to compute the combined taxable income supported the taxpayer's interpretation of the statute in the instant case.

The Department also argued that the difference in the statutory language of the credit in General Motors compared to the statutory language of the credit in the instant case mandated that the credit could not be used by the entire combined group. In General Motors, the credit was limited to the "total amount of income tax due by the taxpayer."5 In the instant case, the gaming license fee credit was allowed "against the income tax liability of the licensee."6 The Department argued that the legislature's use of "income tax liability" and "licensee" as opposed to "tax due" and "taxpayer" supported its interpretation that the credit is limited to the individual entity that earned it. The Court disagreed, determining that the use of the terms "taxpayer" and "licensee" was similar in nature to General Motors, not a difference. According to the Court, the key phrase in the present case was "income tax liability." This phrase is identical to "tax due" used in the statute at issue in General Motors because both phrases refer to the amount of money that the Department is entitled to collect from the taxpayer. Applying General Motors, each entity's tax liability is the same as the group's tax liability because each entity is jointly and severally liable for that amount.7 If the limit on a credit is tax liability, the limit is a reference to the tax liability of the group.

Finally, the Department argued that it has historically interpreted the gaming license tax credit to apply only to the income generated by the use of the license.8 The Court explained that the Department's interpretation of tax is afforded deference, but this deference must be applied in light of General Motors. Because the Court held that the Department incorrectly interpreted the statute in General Motors, it followed that the Department's same interpretation of nearly identical statutory language in the instant case also was incorrect.

Surety Bond Requirements Satisfied

The Court held that the surety bond filed by the taxpayer with the chancery court in the amount of over $2 million, half the amount in controversy, satisfied the statutory surety bond requirements. As a result, the chancery court did not commit error by exercising jurisdiction over the case. The Department argued that the surety bond did not meet the statutory requirements because it was not "conditioned to pay the judgment of the court."9 In rejecting the Department's argument, the Court explained that even though the bond did not use the exact language provided by the statute, it clearly bound the surety to pay the Department. Therefore, the Court held that the surety bond satisfied the statutory requirement that it be conditioned on the judgment of the court.

Commentary

This decision allows credits earned by affiliates of a Mississippi nexus combined group to offset the tax liability of the entire group, rather than solely the tax liability of the affiliates generating the credits. This increases the ability of a combined group to utilize the credits, either on a current or prospective basis. The Court reinforced the General Motors decision from 1987 and held that its reasoning is still applicable, and in some respects stronger, after the intervening statutory amendments. Also, the General Motors holding was applied to the gaming license fee credit. Even though the Department has interpreted this credit to be limited to income generated from the use of the gaming license, the Court held that General Motors was entitled to greater deference than the Department's interpretation. Thus, the gaming license fee credit can be used beyond the income derived from the gaming license, presumably including income from non-gaming activities. While this case concerned the gaming license fee credit, the Court's reading of General Motors may be applied to other tax credits. The decision may inspire other taxpayers with multiple entities that have a Mississippi presence to elect to file in the state on a combined basis in certain situations.

Footnotes

1 Department of Revenue v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., Mississippi Supreme Court, No. 2012-CA-01419-SCT, Feb. 13, 2014.

2 MISS. CODE ANN. § 27-7-37. An affiliated group of corporations with nexus in Mississippi may elect to file, or the Commissioner of the Department may require the filing of what is termed a combined income tax return, in lieu of separate returns. The Mississippi combined return is similar to the consolidated return concept in several states, and consists of a post-apportioned combination of corporations that have Mississippi nexus with no intercompany eliminations.

3 510 So. 2d 498 (Miss. 1987).

4 The statute in effect for General Motors referred to the return as a "consolidated return." As discussed previously, MISS. CODE ANN. § 27-7-37 refers to the return as a "combined return."

5 MISS. CODE ANN. § 27-21-9.

6 MISS. CODE ANN. § 75-76-179.

7 Also, a repealed regulation provided: "Each member of the affiliated group is severally liable for the tax on a consolidated or combined return and for any subsequently determined deficiency thereon. No intercompany agreement can change this rule." CODE MISS. R. 35.III.8.07 at 102(5) (repealed Nov. 17, 2011).

8 Jones County School District v. Department of Revenue, 111 So. 3d 588 (Miss. 2013); Buffington v. Mississippi State Tax Commission, 43 So. 3d 450 (Miss. 2010).

9 See MISS. CODE ANN. § 27-77-7(3).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions