United States: Massachusetts’ Highest Court Upholds Post-Term Non-Compete Clauses

Last Updated: October 28 2004
Article by Lee J. Plave

On October 1, 2004, the highest court in Massachusetts, the Supreme Judicial Court, handed down a ruling in an important case for franchisors, Boulanger v. Dunkin’ Donuts Incorporated, 815 N.E. 2d 572 (Mass. 2004).

The case involved a former Dunkin’ Donuts franchisee who had entered into three franchise agreements for the operation of Dunkin’ Donuts franchises in upstate New York. Among other things, each of these agreements gave the franchisee access to, and the right to use, the Dunkin’ Donuts operating system, trade secrets, and business methods. As part of the consideration for these rights, the franchisee agreed to a post-term non-compete clause, under which he agreed that for two years after the termination of his franchise agreements he would not work for a business selling substantially similar products within five miles of any Dunkin’ Donuts location.

Despite the terms of the franchise agreement, the franchisee sought a declaratory judgment affirming that he was not bound by a post-termination non-competition clause. The franchisee, who had sold his franchise for a profit, wished to buy a franchise from one of Dunkin’ Donuts’ competitors.

By arguing that the non-compete clause was unenforceable, the franchisee challenged a fundamental tenet underpinning franchise systems. Among other arguments, the franchisee contended that the post-term non-compete clause deprived him of the right to earn a living, that it was unreasonable to enforce the clause at "remote locations" (that is, sites other than the location at which the franchisee’s former franchised location was operated), and that the clause sought to protect information that was not actually confidential. On this last point, the franchisee contended that the system information was not a protectable interest because some of that information was conveyed to franchisees at meetings also attended by the franchisor’s employees, who were not subject to a confidentiality agreement.

At trial, the Superior Court rejected the franchisee’s arguments. Boulanger v. Dunkin’ Donuts Incorporated, 2003 Mass. Super. LEXIS 248 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2003). The franchisee appealed and the Supreme Judicial Court took the case under a direct appeal. The case was argued before the court on May 4, 2004. At the Supreme Judicial Court’s invitation, and on behalf of the International Franchise Association, we submitted an amicus curiae brief advising the court that post-termination non-competition clauses should be enforced for the benefit of the franchisor and the franchisees in a franchise system. The court’s ruling agreed with that position.

Standard to Apply to Non-Compete Clauses in Franchise Cases

The Boulanger decision concluded that a non-compete clause, considered in the context of a franchised business, should be evaluated under the same standard courts would apply to a non-compete clause in the context of the sale of a business. This standard – adopted by most states reviewing franchise non-compete clauses – is different and less restrictive than the standard applied to evaluating non-compete clauses in the context of employment agreements. Courts applying the "sale-of-business standard" typically permit greater flexibility to parties and enforce a non-compete clause especially where it was bargained for and where the party that is bound receives a benefit from the decision to include the clause in the parties’ contract.

Reasonableness of the Restrictions

Once it applied the sale-of-business standard, the court struck down the franchisee’s challenge to the reasonableness of the non-compete clause. Even though the franchisee did not challenge the time limit of the clause, the court in dictum noted that the two-year limitation was reasonable. As to the geographic scope – five miles from the original franchised location and five miles from any other franchisee’s location – the court agreed that the scope of the clause was reasonable and intended to protect the franchise system:

"The issue is whether confidential information could be used by the plaintiff to harm other franchisees in other locations. The system is reasonable because it binds all other franchisees and is part of what the [franchisor] sells. The system is part of what the plaintiff, as a franchisee, purchased and what protected him while he was a franchise owner. This conclusion is consonant with the principle that ‘a seller of a business interest may not derogate from the value of the business as sold by competing with it … [because ] the buyer is entitled to the full value of the ‘benefit and advantages’ of his purchase.’"

No Legitimate Business Interest?

The franchisee’s argument on this point suggested that there was no legitimate business interest that could be protected by a non-compete clause because some of the confidential information was passed along in the presence of employees not subject to a confidentiality agreement or a non-compete agreement. The court rejected this argument. In particular, the court wrote that:

All employees were bound by [the franchisor’s corporate] code. Moreover, the fact that the [franchisor] does not require all employees to sign a covenant not to compete is not relevant, because the [franchisor] may reasonably decide which persons pose the greatest risk of using its confidential information competitively, and can reasonably concludethat all franchisees pose such a risk.

The franchisor’s concern was hardly abstract: Seeking to buy a competitive franchise, the franchisee had already contacted another franchisor shortly after selling his franchise. This important point did not go unnoticed by the court. Additionally, the court observed that "[a]lthough the [franchisor] may not have done all it possibly could have to guard the secrecy of the information, the information was nevertheless confidential."

Depriving the Franchisee of the Right to Make a Living

Finally, the court disagreed with the argument that the effect of the non-compete clause was to deprive the plaintiff of the right to earn a living. The ruling observed that the franchisee was not prevented from working at another Dunkin’ Donuts’ location, although in a different capacity than when he was a franchisee, for the duration of the non-compete period.

Massachusetts Courts Will Regard Non-Competes Pragmatically

The Boulanger decision affirms that Massachusetts courts will consider non-competition clauses in the same commercially pragmatic manner as do the majority of other states. The development is beneficial to franchisors and the franchisees who comprise the system and who are all the beneficiaries of these restrictions when reasonably applied.

This article is intended to provide information on recent legal developments. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on specific facts. Pursuant to applicable Rules of Professional Conduct, it may constitute advertising.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions